Moral Diplomacy: Aiming For A Peaceful World Order

Woodrow Wilson's concept of moral diplomacy centred on the idea that US foreign relations should be based on morality and democratic values rather than economic interests. Wilson believed that the US had a moral responsibility to spread democracy and intervene in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America, to curb the growth of imperialism. This approach, which contrasted with the dollar diplomacy of his predecessor, William Howard Taft, aimed to use America's economic power to promote democracy and self-determination in other nations. Wilson's policies, driven by his ethical and religious beliefs, laid the groundwork for the US to become a global actor in international affairs and contributed to its belief in American exceptionalism and its role in spreading liberty and democracy worldwide.

Explore related products

Woodrow Wilson

$14.43 $26

The Moralist: Woodrow Wilson and the World He Made

$18.38 $21

The Wisdom of Woodrow Wilson: Being Selections from His Thoughts and Comments on Political, Social a

$28.99

The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson (American Presidency Series)

$54.52 $99.99

In Face of the Facts: Moral Inquiry in American Scholarship (Woodrow Wilson Center Press)

$71.2 $120

The Collected Works of Woodrow Wilson: A Comprehensive Journey Through Politics, War, and American Ideals

$1.99 $28.1

Woodrow Wilson's 'moral diplomacy'

Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on the belief that the United States had a duty to spread democracy and liberty worldwide. In his 1914 address on "The Meaning of Liberty", Wilson alluded to America's potential to be a "light unto the nations", guiding the world towards justice, liberty, and peace. He intended to put these ideals into action through moral diplomacy, which he saw as a departure from the dollar diplomacy of his predecessor, William Howard Taft, which prioritised economic support as a means to improve bilateral ties. Wilson's approach, on the other hand, was based on economic power and the belief in American exceptionalism.

Wilson frequently intervened in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America, to promote democracy. For instance, he refused to recognise Victoriano Huerta, who had seized power in Mexico in 1913 through a counter-revolution, despite pressure from Americans with economic interests in the country and support from foreign powers due to Huerta's open policies toward foreign investment. Wilson referred to Huerta's regime as a "government of butchers" and instead supported Venustiano Carranza, whose forces controlled northern Mexico. When American sailors were arrested by Mexican officials in Tampico in 1914, Wilson used the incident to justify ordering the US Navy to occupy the port city of Veracruz, ultimately leading to Huerta's downfall.

Wilson also intervened in other Latin American countries, including Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, and Panama. In Haiti, for example, he sent in American marines in 1915 to restore order following a chronic revolution. However, the military occupations in Haiti and the Dominican Republic failed to create the democratic states that were their stated objective. Wilson's insistence on democracy in Latin America undermined the promise of self-determination for these nations, as they had hoped to be free to conduct their own affairs without American interference.

In addition to his interventions in Latin America, Wilson also sought to revolutionise international relations more broadly. In his "Fourteen Points" speech to Congress in 1918, he outlined a vision for a "new diplomacy" that rejected secret treaties and called for the evacuation of all territories occupied during the war. He proposed the dismantling of imperial powers by promoting self-rule in colonial holdings and immediate independence for European sections of the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires. Wilson also advocated for general disarmament, with Germans and Austrians disarming first, and declared that fair treatment of revolutionary Russia would be the "acid test" of the peace.

Opposition to imperialism

Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was a direct opposition to the imperialism of his predecessors and European powers. Wilson believed that the underlying cause of the First World War was the militant nationalism of the major European powers and the ethnic hatreds in Central and Eastern Europe. The conflict saw the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria) on one side, and the Allied Powers (initially Britain, France, Russia, and Serbia, later Italy, Japan, Portugal, certain Latin American nations, China, and Greece) on the other. The war was triggered by a complex web of secret treaties and alliances, which were a result of the imperial holdings of Germany, France, and Britain.

Wilson's moral diplomacy aimed to curb the growth of imperialism and spread democracy. He wanted to replace the dollar diplomacy of William Howard Taft, which was based on economic support to improve bilateral ties, with a diplomacy based on moral values. Wilson's diplomacy was to be hinged upon the values of democracy and national self-determination, with the belief that the United States had a duty to spread democracy and liberty across the world.

In his 1914 address on "The Meaning of Liberty", Wilson alluded to America's potential to be a guiding light for future generations, leading the world towards justice, liberty, and peace. He put these ideas into action through moral diplomacy, frequently intervening in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America. Wilson's interventions included Mexico in 1914, Haiti from 1915 to 1934, the Dominican Republic in 1916, Cuba in 1917, and Panama in 1918.

Wilson's moral diplomacy took the form of intervention in elections and political affairs, with the stated objective of supporting the development of democratic systems and values. However, this often led to military occupation and economic control over the territories, their governments, and their markets. For example, in Haiti, American troops under the command of the federal government forced the Haitian legislature to choose Wilson's selected candidate as Haitian President. Similarly, in Nicaragua, American troops were used to select the president.

Wilson's stance on imperialism posed a problem for diplomacy with Mexico, which had been under the rule of counterrevolutionary General Victoriano Huerta since 1913. Most European nations welcomed the friendly climate for foreign investment that Huerta offered, but Wilson refused to recognize his government, citing that it did not reflect the wishes of the Mexican people and was a "government of butchers". This stance encouraged anti-Huerta forces in northern Mexico led by Venustiano Carranza. In 1914, Wilson used the arrest of American sailors in Tampico as a justification for ordering the US Navy to occupy the port city of Veracruz, which weakened Huerta's control and led to his abandonment of power.

In his Fourteen Points speech delivered to Congress on January 8, 1918, Wilson outlined his vision for a "new diplomacy" consisting of "open covenants openly arrived at". He called for the dismantling of the imperial order, proposing that colonial holdings be opened up to eventual self-rule and that European sections of the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires be granted immediate independence. Wilson also proposed a general disarmament after the war, with the Germans and Austrians giving up their armed forces first.

Support for smaller nations

Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy, known as moral diplomacy, involved supporting smaller nations that agreed to uphold "American" values of political democracy and self-determination. Wilson frequently interfered in the affairs of other countries, especially in Latin America, to spread democracy and curb the growth of imperialism. He believed that the US had a moral responsibility to deny diplomatic recognition to any non-democratic government in Latin America, as per the Monroe Doctrine.

Wilson's moral diplomacy replaced the dollar diplomacy of William Howard Taft, which focused on economic support to improve bilateral ties. In contrast, Wilson's diplomacy was based on economic power and the belief that democracy was gaining strength worldwide. He worked with Secretary of State Bryan to sign 22 bilateral treaties that promoted alternatives to war, such as cooling-off periods and outside fact-finding commissions.

Wilson's support for smaller nations is evident in his actions towards Mexico, which posed a problem for his diplomacy due to its long-standing revolution and counterrevolutionary rule under General Victoriano Huerta. Wilson refused to recognise Huerta's legitimacy, citing his undemocratic rise to power through force. He used the arrest of American sailors in Tampico as a justification for ordering the US Navy to occupy the port city of Veracruz, weakening Huerta's control. Wilson also supported anti-Huerta forces in northern Mexico led by Venustiano Carranza, whom he recognised as Mexico's de facto president after Huerta abandoned power.

In addition to Mexico, Wilson intervened in other Latin American countries, including Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, and Panama. He maintained troops in Nicaragua and used them to select the country's president. Wilson's actions in Haiti, where American troops forced the Haitian legislature to choose his selected candidate as Haitian President, were particularly controversial.

Wilson's vision for international affairs was outlined in his Fourteen Points speech delivered to Congress in 1918. He called for a "new diplomacy" that rejected secret treaties and promoted open covenants, territorial evacuations, imperial dismantlement, and general disarmament. Wilson's ideas about moral diplomacy were influenced by American exceptionalism, which holds that the United States has a unique world mission to spread liberty and democracy.

Explore related products

Woodrow Wilson and Harry Truman: Mission and Power in American Foreign Policy

$59.99 $95

Woodrow Wilson (1858 –1924). Evolution statt Revolution: Religiöse Moral, Liberalismus, idealistischer Internationalismus, Sachzwänge und Realpolitik (German Edition)

$17.35 $44.5

The New Freedom: A Call For the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People

$4.95 $9.99

Princeton for the Nation'S Service: an Address Delivered on the Occasion of His Inauguration as President of Princeton University on October Twenty-Fifth, Mcmii, by Woodrow (1903) [Leather Bound]

$11.45

Inside a U.S. Embassy: Diplomacy at Work, All-New Third Edition of the Essential Guide to the Foreign Service

$7.48 $22.95

America in the World: A History of U.S. Diplomacy and Foreign Policy

$16.96 $35

Spreading democracy

Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was driven by the belief that the United States had a moral responsibility to spread democracy and freedom worldwide. This belief stemmed from American exceptionalism, the idea that the US had a unique mission and ideology based on liberty, egalitarianism, and individualism. Wilson's administration frequently intervened in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America, to promote democracy and counter imperialism.

Wilson's predecessor, William Howard Taft, had pursued a policy of dollar diplomacy, which prioritised economic support to improve bilateral ties. In contrast, Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on economic power and the belief that democracy was the most Christian form of government, suitable for all peoples. He saw the League of Nations as an instrument to promote democracy internationally after World War I.

Wilson's moral diplomacy was evident in his dealings with Mexico. When General Victoriano Huerta gained power through a coup in 1913, Wilson refused to recognise his legitimacy due to his undemocratic rise to power. Wilson also used incidents, such as the arrest of American sailors in Tampico, to justify military interventions like the occupation of Veracruz, which ultimately led to Huerta's downfall.

In his Fourteen Points speech to Congress in 1918, Wilson outlined a vision for a new diplomacy based on open covenants and self-rule for colonial holdings. He called for the dismantling of the imperial order and the independence of European sections of the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires. Wilson's policies set the foundation for the US to become a global actor in international affairs, with a focus on spreading democracy and "American" values.

Wilson's administration actively supported smaller nations that embraced political democracy and self-determination. At the same time, they applied economic and military pressure on nations that rejected these values. This approach extended beyond Latin America, as seen in the US's involvement in the Philippines and Puerto Rico, where residents gained territorial status and US citizenship, respectively. Wilson's belief in spreading democracy led to a shift from isolationism to internationalism in US foreign policy.

Mexico and Latin America

Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was an anti-imperialist ideology that aimed to spread democracy and promote American economic growth. Wilson believed that the United States had a moral duty to spread democracy and peace throughout the world, particularly in Latin America.

In Latin America, Wilson's moral diplomacy was put to the test in Mexico, which was experiencing a series of revolutions at the time. Wilson refused to recognize Victoriano Huerta, who had illegally seized power in 1913, despite pressure from Americans with mining and other interests in Mexico who wanted immediate US intervention to protect their property. Instead, Wilson supported the revolution, attempting to influence the rebel leaders diplomatically. In 1914, he used the arrest of several American sailors in Tampico as a pretext to occupy the port city of Veracruz, which ultimately led to Huerta's downfall. Wilson immediately recognized Carranza, who took power after Huerta, as the de facto president of Mexico. However, Wilson's intervention in Mexico has been criticized as a blunder resulting from his "interventionist impulses."

Wilson also faced challenges in other Latin American countries, including Haiti and the Dominican Republic, where he sent American troops to restore order and promote democracy. These military occupations failed to create the democratic states they aimed for and created permanent hostility between the United States and Latin America. Despite Wilson's intentions, his actions in the region have been characterized as imperialism.

In summary, Wilson's moral diplomacy in Mexico and Latin America was driven by his belief in spreading democracy and promoting American economic interests. While he faced challenges and criticism, he remained committed to his ideals of justice and moderation, aiming to support revolutionary movements and establish democratic governments throughout the region.

Frequently asked questions