Cotton Diplomacy: Civil War's Pivotal Cotton Trade Strategy

During the American Civil War, cotton was the most valuable crop in the South, comprising 59% of the United States' exports. Cotton diplomacy, also known as King Cotton diplomacy, was a strategy employed by the Confederate government to coerce Great Britain and other European countries into an alliance by cutting off their supply of cotton. The Confederate government believed that cotton was a global necessity and that its dominance of the global cotton supply would force Britain and France to support their war effort.

Explore related products

King Cotton Diplomacy: Foreign Relations of the Confederate States of America

$49.95

Colossal Ambitions: Confederate Planning for a Post–Civil War World (A Nation Divided: Studies in the Civil War Era)

$27.5 $52

Agriculture and the Confederacy: Policy, Productivity, and Power in the Civil War South (Civil War America)

$9.99 $19.99

American Civil War: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection [6 volumes]

$562.5

King Cotton Diplomacy: Foreign Relations of the Confederate States of America: 3rd (Third) edition

$119.9

Our Man in Charleston: Britain's Secret Agent in the Civil War South

$12.99 $18

Cotton diplomacy was a Confederate strategy to gain diplomatic recognition and support from Britain and France

Cotton diplomacy was a strategy employed by the Confederate government during the Civil War to gain diplomatic recognition and support from Britain and France. It was based on the belief that the global dominance of "King Cotton" would force these nations to support the Confederate war effort to secure their own access to cotton.

Cotton was the most valuable crop of the South, comprising 59% of exports from the United States. It was also essential to the economies of Europe, which relied heavily on Southern cotton for their textile industries. Before the Civil War, cotton produced in the American South accounted for 77% of the cotton used in Great Britain. Recognising this, Confederate leaders believed that creating a cotton shortage through an informal embargo would lead to diplomatic intervention and possibly aid from European consumers, particularly Britain.

In the summer of 1861, the Confederacy placed an embargo on cotton exports, hoping to coerce Great Britain into an alliance. They also tasked delegates James Mason and John Slidell to travel to England and France, respectively, to demand international recognition of the Confederacy. However, this strategy backfired as the South had previously exported bumper crops, resulting in a cotton surplus in Britain. Additionally, Britain and France were determined to maintain neutrality in the American Civil War.

While Britain did not officially intervene, the Confederacy's cotton embargo did have significant economic impacts. The price of cotton soared, and there was commercial disruption and unemployment in international cotton mills. The embargo also stimulated cotton production in other regions, such as India, Egypt, and Brazil, which increased their production to meet British demands. Despite these challenges, Britain's textile manufacturing flourished as they found alternative sources of cotton.

Cotton diplomacy, as outlined in Frank L. Owsley's book "King Cotton Diplomacy: Foreign Relations of the Confederate States of America", provides valuable insights into Confederate foreign policy and the global economy's dependence on cotton during the Civil War.

The Confederacy believed that cotton was king and that the world depended on their cotton supply

Cotton was the most valuable crop of the South during the Civil War, comprising 59% of the exports from the United States. The cotton industry was one of the world's largest, and most of the world's cotton supply came from the American South. This industry was fuelled by enslaved people on plantations, who were themselves the economic cornerstone of the Confederacy.

The Confederate Congress believed that cotton diplomacy, or a cotton embargo, was the best way to coerce European intervention. Confederate leaders believed that cotton shortages would secure full diplomatic recognition and possibly aid from European consumers of their produce. Chief among these consumers was Great Britain, which consumed most of the output of cotton fibre in the textile mills of the Industrial Revolution. In 1858, Senator James Hammond of South Carolina declared:

> Without cotton, old England would topple headlong and carry the whole civilized world with her... No, you dare not make war on cotton. No power on earth dares to make war upon it. Cotton is king.

In the summer of 1861, the Confederacy placed an embargo on cotton exports, destroying all commerce lines with foreign entities. This embargo started the diplomatic strategy of cotton diplomacy. The Confederate government tasked James Mason of Virginia and John Slidell of Louisiana with travelling to England and France respectively to demand international recognition of the Confederacy. However, the Confederacy had made a miscalculation. Southern states had exported bumper crops throughout the late 1850s and in 1860, and as a result, Great Britain had a surplus of cotton. The cotton surplus delayed the "cotton famine" and the British textile industry was not crippled until late 1862. But when the famine did come, it transformed the global economy. The price of cotton soared from 10 cents a pound in 1860 to $1.89 a pound in 1863-1864.

Cotton diplomacy did not have the desired effect. Britain and France maintained their neutrality in the American Civil War. In response to the cotton shortage, Britain and continental Europe found other cotton supplies, importing cotton from Egypt and the East Indies. Cotton manufacturing and industry did not stop without Southern goods; indeed, textile manufacturing flourished after other cotton suppliers were found.

The Union blockade of Confederate ports restricted access to cotton and weakened the Confederate economy

Cotton was the most valuable crop of the South and comprised 59% of the exports from the United States before the Civil War. The Confederate economy relied heavily on cotton exports, which served as the primary economic driver of the Confederate economy.

Recognizing the importance of cotton to the Confederate economy, President Abraham Lincoln ordered a blockade of Confederate ports in April 1861 to weaken the Confederacy's economy. The blockade restricted naval and merchant access to Confederate ports, preventing the export of cotton and the import of war materiel into the Confederacy. By July 1861, the Union Navy had established blockades of all the major southern ports.

The blockade proved highly effective in decreasing cotton exports to Europe, which dropped from 3.8 million bales in 1860 to almost nothing in 1862. This disrupted the Confederate economy, as cotton exports were a vital source of revenue. The blockade also prevented the Confederacy from accessing weapons and other supplies necessary for the war effort.

In response to the blockade, the Confederacy attempted to use cotton diplomacy to coerce Britain and France into supporting their war effort. They believed that restricting the supply of cotton to these countries, which were heavily dependent on Southern cotton for their textile industries, would lead to diplomatic recognition and intervention. However, this strategy ultimately backfired as European nations sought alternative sources of cotton from Egypt, India, and Brazil.

Explore related products

Henri Mercier and the American Civil War (Princeton Legacy Library)

$75

States at War, Volume 6: The Confederate States Chronology and a Reference Guide for South Carolina in the Civil War

$59.99 $100

Hired Guns: Views About Armed Contractors in Operation Iraqi Freedom

$23.75 $25

Congress of States: Proceedings of the Provisional Congress of the Confederate States of America

$107.18 $115

Bullets, Ballots, and Rhetoric: Confederate States Policy for the United States Presidential Contest

$31.3 $32.95

Civil War - BLURAY, Digital, 4K ULTRA HD [Blu-ray]

$15.94 $17.95

The cotton embargo caused a cotton famine in Lancashire and a sharp drop in cotton supply from 1861 to 1862

Cotton was the most valuable crop of the South and comprised 59% of the exports from the United States at the time of the Civil War. It was also America's leading export, and raw cotton was essential to the European economy. In 1858, Senator James Hammond of South Carolina boldly stated that without cotton, "old England would topple headlong and carry the whole civilized world with her." This statement reflected the South's confidence in American cotton as a global necessity.

When the Civil War broke out, Confederate President Jefferson Davis and his cabinet realized that they could not compete economically with the Union as cotton exports were the primary economic driver of the Confederate economy. As a result, they resorted to cotton diplomacy or a cotton embargo to coerce European intervention. This strategy aimed to withhold all exports of raw cotton to force Europe, particularly Britain, to intervene and provide valuable allies or generate enough profit to sustain the war effort.

The cotton embargo contributed to a cotton famine in Lancashire, England, and a sharp drop in cotton supply from 1861 to 1862. Lancashire was heavily dependent on cotton imports from America, and the interruption of these imports caused a depression in the textile industry. Mill closures, mass unemployment, and poverty struck northern Britain, and soup kitchens were opened in early 1862. The cotton famine also caused cotton prices to soar, further exacerbating the economic hardship.

While the cotton embargo caused significant disruption in Lancashire, it ultimately failed to coerce European intervention. Britain and France remained determined to maintain neutrality in the American Civil War. Additionally, Britain and continental Europe began importing cotton from alternative sources, such as Egypt and the East Indies, to alleviate the cotton shortage.

The embargo backfired as Britain and continental Europe found alternative cotton supplies from Egypt and East India

During the American Civil War, cotton was the most valuable crop of the South, comprising 59% of the exports from the United States. The Confederate Congress believed that cutting off cotton exports to Britain and Europe would force them to intervene and support the Confederacy during the Civil War. This strategy was known as "Cotton Diplomacy" or "King Cotton Diplomacy".

Cotton was essential to Britain's dominant textile industry, and the Confederate leaders believed that an embargo would lead to diplomatic recognition and support from European consumers. However, this strategy backfired as Britain and continental Europe found alternative sources of cotton from Egypt and East India (or the East Indies).

Before the Civil War, Britain had accumulated a surplus of cotton due to the high volume of exports from the American South. This delayed the impact of the embargo, and it was not until late 1862 that a cotton famine hit Lancashire, causing commercial disruption and unemployment in international cotton mills. However, Britain and continental Europe began to look for alternative sources of cotton to alleviate the shortage.

In 1862, Britain started importing cotton from Egypt and East India, and by 1865, consumption of East Indian cotton had increased by 400,000 bales. While this did not fully make up for the loss of American cotton, it demonstrated that alternative sources were available and that Britain and Europe were willing to use them.

The failure of the cotton embargo had significant implications for the Confederacy, as it showed that their economic power was not as strong as they had believed. It also highlighted the global impact of the cotton industry, which can be compared to the influence of the oil industry in the early 21st century.

Frequently asked questions