
Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was a form of diplomacy proposed during his 1912 presidential election campaign. Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on economic power and the belief that the United States had a duty to spread democracy and peace throughout the world. Wilson's vision was to shift from isolationism to internationalism, with a focus on supporting countries with democratic governments and economically damaging those with non-democratic governments. He believed that nations must join together in a concert of power to spread democracy and freedom, and that the United States had to play a pioneering role in this mission. Wilson's ideas about moral diplomacy were influenced by American exceptionalism and his personal racist views. Despite his idealism, Wilson's attempts at mediation during World War I were largely unsuccessful, and he died in 1924. However, elements of Wilsonianism have survived, including the creation of the United Nations and the promotion of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Basis of Moral Diplomacy | Democracy, peace, and freedom |
| Moral Diplomacy in Action | Support for countries with democratic governments and economic injury to non-democratic countries |
| Self-Determination | People's moral right to choose their form of government and leaders through democratic elections |
| Neutrality | Tried to mediate peace between the two warring European alliances during World War I |
| Opposition to Imperialism | Opposition to imperialism in Latin America |
| Bilateral Treaties | Signed 22 bilateral treaties for cooling-off periods and outside fact-finding commissions as alternatives to war |
| Tariff Reform | Signed the Underwood-Simmons Act to bring down tariffs and implement a graduated income tax |
| International Organisations | Proposed the idea of nations joining together in a "concert of power" to spread democracy |
| Anti-Interventionism | Refused to recognize Victoriano Huerta's government in Mexico due to his authoritarian rule |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on economic power, not economic support
- He believed that governments must exist by the consent of the governed
- Wilson's ideas about moral diplomacy were influenced by American exceptionalism
- He wanted to spread democracy, peace, and freedom
- Wilson's intervention in Mexico was an example of his moral diplomacy in action

Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on economic power, not economic support
Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on economic power rather than economic support. Moral diplomacy, as coined by Wilson, is a system in which support is given only to countries whose beliefs are analogous to that of the United States. This was used to support countries with democratic governments and to economically injure non-democratic countries. Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on the principle of "self-determination", the moral right of people to choose their form of government and leaders through democratic elections.
Wilson's economic policies created programs to establish domestic federal oversight of the economy and implemented tariff reform to support his vision of open, free markets. The Underwood-Simmons Act, signed in 1913, reduced tariffs on manufactured products and raw materials, lowered costs for consumers, and implemented a graduated income tax. These policies set the foundation for the United States to gain more power on the world stage, while working with other nations to collectively advance their ideals and interests.
Wilson's moral diplomacy was also used to protect American economic and political hegemony in Latin America, despite his stated goal of ensuring peace and freedom for the region's inhabitants. His diplomacy exemplified American exceptionalism and was influenced by his personal racist views of the people his diplomatic actions affected. Wilson's engagement with the Mexican government is a notable example of his use of moral diplomacy. When counterrevolutionary General Victoriano Huerta gained control of Mexico in 1913, Wilson refused to recognize his regime due to its authoritarian nature and the fact that he had illegally seized power. This stance weakened Huerta and ultimately led to his replacement by Venustiano Carranza, whom Wilson recognized as the de facto president of Mexico.
Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on the belief that the United States had a duty to spread democracy and peace throughout the world. He opposed imperialism and sought to curb its growth by encouraging the creation of international organizations to promote democracy and mutual goals. Wilson's 14 points, outlined in his "Fourteen Points" speech in 1918, reflected his commitment to spreading democracy and creating a new diplomacy based on open covenants and the self-determination of nations.
In conclusion, Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on the use of economic power and pressure to promote American ideals and interests, rather than providing economic support to other nations. His policies and actions, particularly in Latin America and Mexico, illustrate his commitment to spreading democracy and establishing the United States as a progressive capitalist nation on the global stage.
US Diplomacy: Effective or Not?
You may want to see also

He believed that governments must exist by the consent of the governed
Woodrow Wilson, the 28th President of the United States, is known for his idealistic and moralistic approach to diplomacy, which became known as "Wilsonian moral diplomacy". Wilson believed that the United States had a duty to spread democracy and peace throughout the world. He felt that democracy was the most essential aspect of a stable and prosperous nation and that the United States had to play a pioneering role in promoting these values. This belief was rooted in the concept of American exceptionalism, the idea that the United States has a unique world mission to spread liberty and democracy.
Wilson's moral diplomacy was a sharp departure from the dollar diplomacy of his predecessor, William Howard Taft, which emphasised economic support to improve bilateral ties. In contrast, Wilson's approach was based on economic power and the belief that support should only be given to countries with democratic governments. He sought to use America's economic might to encourage the growth of democracy and to economically injure non-democratic countries, which he saw as possible threats to the United States.
One of the key principles of Wilson's moral diplomacy was self-determination, the moral right of people to choose their form of government and leaders through democratic elections. He believed that governments must exist by the "consent of the governed", a sentiment he expressed in his 1914 address on "The Meaning of Liberty". This principle guided his interventions in Latin America, where he frequently meddled in the affairs of countries such as Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic.
Wilson's belief in the consent of the governed also influenced his approach to international relations during World War I. When the United States entered the war in April 1917, Wilson sought to mediate a just peace and advance democracy. He proposed a concert of power, an international organisation that would unite nations large and small to ensure stability and an end to war. This vision eventually led to the creation of the League of Nations, a precursor to the United Nations.
Wilson's commitment to the consent of the governed extended beyond his foreign policy. Domestically, he worked to advance democracy and ensure that the government was more accountable to the people. For example, he signed the Jones Act, which granted Puerto Rican citizens US citizenship and gave the territory partial legal independence. He also promised the Philippines full independence once a democratic government was established there. These actions demonstrated his belief in the self-determination of nations and the importance of governments existing by the consent of the governed.
Diplomacy: Navigating Arguments for Global Solutions
You may want to see also

Wilson's ideas about moral diplomacy were influenced by American exceptionalism
Woodrow Wilson's ideas about moral diplomacy were influenced by American exceptionalism. Wilson's moral diplomacy was a form of diplomacy in which support was given only to countries whose beliefs were analogous to that of the nation. This promoted the growth of the nation's ideals and damaged nations with different ideologies. Wilson's moral diplomacy was primarily initiated to influence US relations in Latin America, but it had several effects on international relations as a whole.
Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on the principle of self-determination, the moral right of people to choose their form of government and leaders by democratic elections. He believed that the United States had to play a pioneering role in promoting democracy and peace throughout the world. Wilson's moral diplomacy, therefore, served to protect American economic and political hegemony in Latin America, despite his stated goal of ensuring peace and freedom for its inhabitants.
Wilson's moral diplomacy was influenced by his belief in American exceptionalism, the idea that the qualities of the US government and its underlying values are not only universally applicable but also superior to all potential alternatives. This belief was reflected in Wilson's actions, such as his intervention in Mexico, where he refused to recognize the counterrevolutionary government of General Victoriano Huerta, who had imposed a bloody authoritarian rule on the country. Wilson's stance encouraged anti-Huerta forces in northern Mexico led by Venustiano Carranza, whom Wilson recognized as the de facto president of Mexico after Huerta abandoned power.
Wilson's moral diplomacy also took the form of intervention in elections and political affairs to 'support' the development of democratic systems and values. For example, American troops in Haiti, under the command of the federal government, forced the Haitian legislature to choose the candidate Wilson selected as Haitian President. Wilson's actions were also influenced by his belief in the superiority of American ideology and institutions, as he felt that the US had a duty to spread democracy and its values throughout the world.
Wilson's ideas about moral diplomacy were also shaped by his desire to spread democracy, peace, and freedom. He believed that nations needed to forge international organizations to solidify their mutual goal of democracy and place pressure on non-democratic entities. Wilson's 14 points, outlined in his "Fourteen Points" speech delivered to Congress on January 8, 1918, called for a "new diplomacy" based on open covenants and the reduction of economic barriers to promote democracy and freedom.
Fleet's Role in Army Diplomacy: A Strategic Support?
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$44.37

He wanted to spread democracy, peace, and freedom
Woodrow Wilson's presidency was marked by his commitment to spreading democracy, peace, and freedom through his brand of "moral diplomacy". Wilson's concept of moral diplomacy was rooted in the belief that the United States had a duty to promote democracy and peace worldwide. He saw democracy as the cornerstone of a stable and prosperous nation and wanted to increase the number of democratic nations, especially in Latin America, which was grappling with the influence of imperialism at the time.
Wilson's moral diplomacy represented a shift from the previous administration's "dollar diplomacy", which emphasised economic support as a means to improve bilateral ties. In contrast, Wilson's approach was based on economic power and the belief in American Exceptionalism, which positioned the United States as uniquely responsible for spreading liberty and democracy. This belief in American Exceptionalism led to interventions in Latin American countries like Mexico, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, and Panama, where Wilson sought to promote democracy and curb imperialism.
One of the earliest examples of Wilson's moral diplomacy in action was his refusal to recognise Victoriano Huerta's government in Mexico. Huerta had seized power through a counterrevolution and imposed authoritarian rule. Despite pressure from Americans with economic interests in Mexico and support from foreign powers, Wilson refused to legitimise a government that did not reflect the wishes of the Mexican people. This stance ultimately contributed to Huerta's downfall and the rise of Venustiano Carranza, who Wilson recognised as Mexico's de facto president.
Wilson also sought to spread democracy in the Philippines and Puerto Rico. He signed the Jones Act, granting Puerto Ricans US citizenship and establishing a local government that mirrored the US system. The Act also promised the Philippines full independence once a democratic government was established, although this would not be achieved until the 1940s. Wilson's actions in these territories were motivated by his belief in self-determination, the moral right of people to choose their leaders and form of government through democratic elections.
On the global stage, Wilson's commitment to democracy and peace led him to propose fourteen points that he believed would shape a just and stable post-World War I order. These points included open covenants of peace, freedom of navigation upon the seas, the removal of economic barriers, and the reduction of national armaments. Wilson's idealism extended beyond the war, as he envisioned a worldwide peace organisation that would ensure stability and prevent future conflicts. This vision culminated in the creation of the League of Nations, a precursor to the United Nations.
Diplomacy's Role in Shaping Italy's History
You may want to see also

Wilson's intervention in Mexico was an example of his moral diplomacy in action
Woodrow Wilson's intervention in Mexico was an example of his moral diplomacy in action. Wilson's foreign policy was based on moral principles and a belief in the importance of democracy, peace, and freedom. He wanted to spread these ideals throughout the world and felt that the United States had a duty to play a pioneering role in this regard.
Mexico posed a challenge for Wilson's diplomacy due to its ongoing revolution since 1899. In 1913, Mexico came under the rule of counterrevolutionary General Victoriano Huerta, whose authoritarian regime was opposed by Wilson. Despite support for Huerta from Americans and foreign powers due to his open policies toward foreign investment, Wilson refused to recognize his government, stating that it did not reflect the wishes of the Mexican people. This stance encouraged anti-Huerta forces led by Venustiano Carranza.
In April 1914, a diplomatic incident occurred when Mexican officials in Tampico arrested several American sailors who entered a prohibited area. Wilson used this incident to justify ordering the US Navy to occupy the port city of Veracruz, weakening Huerta's control. Huerta eventually abandoned power, and Wilson recognized Carranza as the de facto president of Mexico.
Wilson's intervention in Mexico demonstrated his commitment to self-determination and democracy. He believed that governments should exist by the "consent of the governed" and that nations should join together in a "concert of power" to maintain peace. This belief in international cooperation and the spread of democracy formed the basis of his moral diplomacy.
However, Wilson's actions in Mexico were not without controversy. He initially supported Pancho Villa, a rival of Carranza, and sent US troops into Mexico in pursuit of Villa, which resulted in a confrontation between American and Carranza's forces. Wilson eventually withdrew the troops and reaffirmed his commitment to Mexican self-determination. Wilson's intervention in Mexico showcased his attempt to apply his moral principles in foreign policy, even in a complex and dynamic regional context.
Gift-Giving: Diplomacy and Peace Between Native Nations
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Woodrow Wilson, the 28th President of the United States, is known for his advocacy of moral diplomacy.
Wilson believed that the United States had a duty to spread democracy and peace throughout the world. He promoted the idea that democracy is essential for a nation's stability and prosperity. Wilson's moral diplomacy aimed to support democratic governments and economically disadvantage non-democratic countries.
Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on the principle of "self-determination", the right of people to choose their government and leaders through democratic elections. He also emphasised the importance of reducing military forces, ensuring freedom of the seas for trade, and creating international organisations to foster cooperation among nations.

























