Federalists' Push: Ratifying The Constitution

The ratification of the US Constitution was a highly contested issue, with two parties emerging: the Federalists, who supported the Constitution, and the Anti-Federalists, who opposed it. The Federalists, who were nationalists, wanted to bring the issue before the people, where ratification was more likely. They defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were resistant to ratifying a new, stronger, centralized government and wanted to retain the powers of state governments.

Explore related products

The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings (Leather-bound Classics)

$13.21 $24.99

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Mapping the Constitution: The Cartographic History of the Ratification of the Constitution

$25.07 $40

Original Intentions: On the Making and Ratification of the United States Constitution

$32.88

Federalists vs Anti-Federalists

The Federalists were supporters of the Constitution and wanted it ratified. They defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. To ensure ratification by all states, Federalists agreed to add a group of amendments that would serve as the Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the Constitution. Many state governments were also interested in retaining their powers and were resistant to ratifying a new, stronger, centralized government. The Anti-Federalists were mounting an effective opposition in essays and debates. Some demanded prior amendments to be sent to a second convention before they would accept the new government. During the debate in Massachusetts, opposition forced the Federalists to promise to consider amendments protecting the liberties of the people after the Constitution was ratified as written.

The Bill of Rights

The Federalists were the party that supported the ratification of the Constitution. They defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. The Federalists wanted to bring the issue before "the people", where ratification was more likely.

To ensure ratification by all states, supporters of the Constitution (Federalists) agreed to add a group of amendments that would serve as the Bill of Rights. Many against the Constitution (Anti-Federalists) refused to ratify unless such individual rights were protected.

When the First Federal Congress met in 1789, James Madison implemented the idea by introducing 17 amendments. By December 1791, 10 were ratified by the necessary three-fourths of the states, and these became part of the US Constitution, and thereinafter known as the Bill of Rights.

The establishment clause arose as an important issue to address during Madison's efforts to ratify the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was a compromise between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, with the Federalists promising to consider amendments protecting the liberties of the people after the Constitution was ratified.

State governments' powers

The Federalists were the party that supported the ratification of the Constitution. They defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. The Federalists wanted to bring the issue before "the people", where ratification was more likely.

State governments powers

The Federalists' support for a stronger national government meant that many state governments were resistant to ratifying the Constitution, as they were interested in retaining their powers. The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the Constitution, demanded prior amendments to be sent to a second convention before they would accept the new government. Some states, such as Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia, were large and powerful enough to pose a significant threat to the Federalists' efforts.

The Federalists knew that they needed to win over nine states to ratify the Constitution, and by mid-January 1788, they had already secured five: Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. To gain the support of the remaining states, the Federalists had to promise to consider amendments protecting the liberties of the people after the Constitution was ratified.

The First Federal Congress met in 1789, and James Madison introduced 17 amendments to the Constitution to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists. By December 1791, 10 of these amendments had been ratified by the necessary three-fourths of the states and became known as the Bill of Rights. This compromise ensured that the Constitution was ratified by all states, and the Federalists' vision of a stronger national government was realised.

Explore related products

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

$17.1 $19.99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$61.11 $85

The Framing and Ratification of the Constitution

$69.99

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$27.9 $42.5

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 1: Constitutional Documents and Records 1776-1787 (Volume 1)

$95

The First Federal Congress

The Federalists were the party that supported the ratification of the Constitution. They defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. By mid-January 1788, five states (Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) had ratified the Constitution. The Federalists were building momentum toward the nine states they needed to win, but they knew the main opposition would come from Anti-Federalists in large and powerful states, including Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia.

The Anti-Federalists were the party that opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They were resistant to ratifying a new, stronger, centralised government, and wanted to retain their powers. The Anti-Federalists were mounting an effective opposition in essays and debates, and some demanded prior amendments to be sent to a second convention before they would accept the new government.

To ensure ratification by all states, supporters of the Constitution (the Federalists) agreed to add a group of amendments that would serve as the Bill of Rights. Many against the Constitution (the Anti-Federalists) refused to ratify unless such individual rights were protected. When the First Federal Congress met in 1789, James Madison implemented the idea by introducing 17 amendments. By December 1791, 10 were ratified by the necessary three-fourths of the states, and these became part of the US Constitution, and thereinafter known as the Bill of Rights.

The establishment clause arose as an important issue to address during Madison's efforts to ratify the Constitution. The nationalists wanted to bring the issue before "the people," where ratification was more likely.

The establishment clause

The Federalists were the party that wanted the Constitution ratified. They defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary.

Another important issue that has arisen is the question of how the Establishment Clause applies to public schools. The Supreme Court has ruled that public schools cannot promote or inhibit any particular religion, but they can teach about religion in an objective and academic manner. This has led to some controversy, particularly around the teaching of evolution and the inclusion of religious holidays in the school calendar.

Overall, the Establishment Clause plays a crucial role in ensuring religious freedom and preventing the government from establishing an official religion in the United States. Its interpretation and application have evolved over time, reflecting the changing social and political landscape of the nation.

Frequently asked questions