
The Federalists were a group of supporters of the ratification of the US Constitution. They were opposed by the Anti-Federalists, who did not support ratification. The Federalists were better organised and had strong support in the press, ultimately prevailing in state ratification debates. The Federalists included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They favoured weaker state governments, a strong centralised government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Ratification of the Constitution | In favour |
| National government | In favour of a strong national government |
| State governments | In favour of weaker state governments |
| Centralised government | In favour |
| Election of government officials | In favour of indirect election |
| Term limits for officeholders | In favour of longer term limits |
| Democracy | In favour of representative democracy |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

The Federalists were better organised than the Anti-Federalists
The Federalists published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers in which they advocated ratification of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton was an influential Federalist who wrote many of the essays in The Federalist, published in 1788. These articles advocated the ratification of the Constitution. Later, those who supported Hamilton’s aggressive fiscal policies formed the Federalist Party, which grew to support a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, wrote many essays of their own, but they were not as well-organised as the Federalists. They argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. They fought against the creation of a stronger national government and sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution.
Dangers of Ratifying the Constitution: Patrick Henry's Perspective
You may want to see also

The Federalists had strong support in the press
The Federalists included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They supported a strong union and the adoption of the Constitution, and were in favour of weaker state governments, a strong centralised government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy. They also supported an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy.
Connecticut Compromise: Constitution Ratification Enabler
You may want to see also

The Federalists wanted a strong national government
The Federalists were faced with forceful Anti-Federalist opposition to a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. They fought against the creation of a stronger national government and sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution.
The Federalists published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers in which they advocated ratification of the Constitution. They were better organised than the Anti-Federalists, had strong support in the press of the day, and ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates. Alexander Hamilton was an influential Federalist who wrote many of the essays in The Federalist, published in 1788. These articles advocated the ratification of the Constitution. Later, those who supported Hamilton’s aggressive fiscal policies formed the Federalist Party, which grew to support a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy.
James Madison's Role in Ratifying the Constitution
You may want to see also
Explore related products

The Federalists wanted weaker state governments
Alexander Hamilton was an influential Federalist who wrote many of the essays in *The Federalist*, published in 1788. These articles advocated the ratification of the Constitution. Later, those who supported Hamilton’s aggressive fiscal policies formed the Federalist Party, which grew to support a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy.
The Federalists were opposed by the Anti-Federalists, who did not want the Constitution to be ratified. They argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. The Federalists ultimately prevailed, and the US Constitution was ratified in 1788, and went into effect in 1789.
Amending the Constitution: Two Key Ratification Methods Explained
You may want to see also

The Federalists wanted a more mercantile economy
The Federalists were in favour of ratifying the Constitution. They published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers advocating for its adoption. They were better organised than the Anti-Federalists and had strong support in the press of the day. Ultimately, they prevailed in state ratification debates.
The Federalists included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They wanted a strong union and a strong centralised government. They also favoured weaker state governments, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy.
Alexander Hamilton was an influential Federalist who wrote many of the essays in The Federalist, published in 1788. These articles advocated the ratification of the Constitution. Later, those who supported Hamilton’s aggressive fiscal policies formed the Federalist Party, which grew to support a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy.
Colonies' Consensus: Ratifying the Constitution
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The Federalists were in favour of ratifying the Constitution. They supported a strong union and a strong national government. They also advocated for weaker state governments, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy.
The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution because they believed it would create a stronger union and a more centralised government. They also supported Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies and a more mercantile economy.
The Federalists included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals.
The Anti-Federalists did not want to ratify the Constitution. They argued that it gave too much power to the federal government and took too much power away from state and local governments. They sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation, which were the predecessor of the Constitution.
The Federalists ultimately prevailed and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, going into effect in 1789.

























