Compromises In The Constitution: A Foundation Of Balances

The US Constitution, drafted in 1787, is sometimes called a bundle of compromises due to the many concessions made by delegates to create a government charter acceptable to each of the 13 states. One of the most significant compromises was the Great Compromise, which addressed the issue of congressional representation. The Three-Fifths Compromise was another morally dubious agreement that mirrored the established slavery system, counting enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes. The Commerce Compromise gave Congress authority over trade, excluding the slave trade for 20 years. The Electoral College Compromise was another key agreement, establishing a system for electing the president. These compromises were essential in bridging the gaps between different interests and views, allowing the Constitution to be ratified and forming the foundation of the US federal government.

Explore related products

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

The Taming of Free Speech: America’s Civil Liberties Compromise

$53 $53

Justice Robert H. Jackson's Unpublished Opinion in Brown v. Board: Conflict, Compromise, and Constitutional Interpretation

$49.99 $54.99

The Union As It Is: Constitutional Unionism and Sectional Compromise, 1787-1861

$63.31 $50

Constitutional Convention of 1787, The: A Reference Guide (Guides to Historic Events in America)

$15.23 $29.95

Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution

$17.61 $20

The Great Compromise

The compromise was approved on July 16, 1787, by a narrow margin of one vote. Many historians have noted that without this vote, there might not have been a U.S. Constitution today. The Great Compromise was a pivotal moment in the drafting of the Constitution, addressing one of the most controversial aspects of its creation.

Three-Fifths Compromise

The Three-Fifths Compromise, also known as the Constitutional Compromise of 1787, was an agreement reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. This agreement was regarding the inclusion of slaves in counting a state's total population. This total population count would then determine the number of seats in the House of Representatives, the number of electoral votes each state would be allocated, and how much money the states would pay in taxes.

The Southern states wanted each slave to be counted as a full person, whereas the Northern states did not want slaves to be counted at all. The Southern states, where the economy relied heavily on the enslavement of African people, wanted slaves to be counted in terms of representation. On the other hand, the Northern states, which had an industrialized economy, did not want slaves to count towards representation as they felt that counting them would provide the South with a greater number of representatives.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a resolution to this issue, stating that the number of representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers. These numbers were to be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding untaxed Native Americans, three-fifths of all other persons. This compromise reduced the representation of the slave states relative to the original proposals, but improved it over the Northern position. It also tied taxation to the same ratio, reducing the tax burden on the slave states.

The Three-Fifths Compromise is part of Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. This clause was superseded and explicitly repealed in 1868 by Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Commerce Compromise

The Commerce Compromise, also known as the Commerce Clause, was one of the key compromises reached during the drafting of the US Constitution. It addressed the question of how the new federal government should regulate business and commerce.

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the US Constitution, which grants Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among the several states, and with the Indian tribes". This clause gave Congress broad authority over interstate commerce and restricted states from impairing it. The power to regulate commerce included the ability to regulate the trade, transportation, or movement of people and goods between states, foreign nations, and Indian tribes. However, it did not originally include the power to regulate economic activities such as manufacturing or agriculture that produced the goods being traded.

The Commerce Compromise was a significant agreement as it determined the balance of power between the federal government and the states in terms of regulating commerce. While Congress gained the authority to control domestic and international trade, it did not have the power to regulate the slave trade for at least 20 years. This compromise was reached as some states feared that a central government with the authority to regulate commerce might favour certain states over others. On the other hand, other states recognised the need for a central authority to control commerce to avoid trade conflicts and ensure a well-functioning national economy.

The interpretation and application of the Commerce Clause have been the subject of ongoing debate and legal cases. Over time, the Supreme Court has broadened and narrowed its interpretation, with cases such as NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp in 1937, and US v. Lopez in 1995, shaping the understanding of congressional power over commerce. The Commerce Clause has been used to justify congressional authority in various areas, including the abolition of the slave trade with other nations, which took effect on January 1, 1808, the earliest date allowed by the Constitution.

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention Of 1787: The Drafting Of The U.S. Constitution

$9.99

Noble Undertaking: Volume 1: The Continental Congress and the American Revolution, 1774–78

$14.21 $39.95

Great Cases in Constitutional Law

$44 $47

Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History (Princeton Studies in American Politics)

$29.95 $29.95

The Great Compromise which Created the Government of the United States of America: Volume Two: The Populist - Anti-Federalist Papers

$32.12

The Great Compromise which Created the Government of the United States of America: The Federalist - Anti-Populist Papers

$24.37

Electoral College Compromise

The drafting of the US Constitution was a complex process that involved a series of compromises among the delegates representing different states and interests. One of the critical compromises reached during the Constitutional Convention was the Electoral College Compromise, which determined how the president would be selected.

The Electoral College Compromise was a resolution between two opposing positions: some delegates supported direct popular election, while others favoured election by Congress. The compromise resulted in the creation of the Electoral College, a body of electors who would elect the president. This system provided several advantages and addressed concerns regarding factionalism and state representation.

Firstly, the Electoral College allowed for the election of the president by individuals who were not necessarily affiliated with any political party or faction. This was intended to mitigate the influence of factions and ensure that the president was chosen based on ability rather than political ties. It aimed to guarantee that the president would be selected on merit rather than solely on partisan considerations.

Secondly, the compromise gave each state at least three electors, regardless of its population. This provision granted smaller states a stronger voice in the presidential election and addressed the concerns of less populous states, ensuring that they were not overshadowed by larger states during the electoral process.

Additionally, the Electoral College Compromise struck a balance between the interests of the states and the federal government. By allowing both entities to participate in the presidential election, the compromise accommodated federalist and anti-federalist sentiments. It reflected the wariness of centralised power among the delegates, who were loyal to their respective states, and it helped establish a strong central government that could effectively address the nation's challenges.

The Electoral College Compromise was a pivotal agreement in the drafting of the US Constitution, addressing concerns about representation, factionalism, and the balance of power between the states and the federal government. It has had a lasting impact on the election of the president in the United States, shaping the way in which the nation's leader is chosen to this day.

Tariff Compromise

The Tariff Compromise, also known as the Compromise Tariff, was a key aspect of the US Constitution, which has been described as a "bundle of compromises". The Tariff Compromise addressed the issue of tariffs, which were taxes imposed on imported goods. The compromise was designed to gradually reduce tariff rates over time, lowering all tariff rates above 20% by one-tenth every two years, with the final reduction back to 20% in 1842. This compromise was reached to address the concerns of both the Northern and Southern states.

The Northern states, which had an industrialised economy, wanted to impose tariffs on imported finished goods from Britain to protect their domestic industries from foreign competition. They also wanted to encourage the Southern states to purchase goods produced in the North. On the other hand, the Southern states, with an agricultural economy, relied on importing finished goods from Britain and were concerned about the impact of tariffs on their economy.

The Tariff Compromise mandated that tariffs would only be allowed on imports into the United States and not on exports. This compromise also gave the federal government the power to regulate interstate commerce and required that all commerce legislation be passed by a two-thirds majority in the Senate, giving more power to the Southern states with their smaller populations.

The issue of tariffs was a significant point of contention and was intertwined with the question of slavery. The Tariff Compromise helped to defer a constitutional and sectional crisis, known as the Nullification Crisis, which had its roots in the tariff acts of 1828 and 1832. The crisis was triggered by South Carolina's refusal to accept federal tariffs and the subsequent passage of the Force Bill by Congress, granting President Jackson powers to enforce the tariffs. The Compromise Tariff helped to resolve this crisis by reducing tariff rates and leading South Carolina to repeal the Ordinance of Nullification.

While the Tariff Compromise was an important aspect of the US Constitution, it is important to note that the issue of tariffs and the balance of power between the states and the federal government continued to evolve over time. The US Constitution grants Congress the power to levy tariffs, but in recent years, the president and the executive branch have gained more control over tariff policies. This has led to debates about the delegation of authority and the role of the president in enacting tariff policies.

Frequently asked questions