Who Does The Us Constitution Protect?

There is a common misconception that the US Constitution only applies to US citizens. However, this is not entirely true. While some rights are reserved for citizens, such as the right to vote, the Constitution also affords certain protections to noncitizens. The Constitution uses the terms people or person in many parts, and these laws apply to everyone physically present in the US, regardless of citizenship. This includes rights such as freedom of speech and religion, due process, equal protection under the law, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Supreme Court has also ruled that non-citizen children are entitled to a K-12 education under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. However, the question of whether the First Amendment applies to non-citizens remains a subject of legal debate.

Explore related products

The Human Rights of Non-citizens

$194.87

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Know Your Bill of Rights Book: Don't Lose Your Constitutional Rights--Learn Them!

$8.75 $14.99

Human Security and Non-Citizens: Law, Policy and International Affairs

$151.5 $191

Beyond Borders: The Human Rights of Non-Citizens at Home and Abroad

$33.24 $34.99

Noncitizen Power: Agency and the Politics of Migration

$86.8 $29.95

Noncitizens' rights to due process and equal protection under the law

The US Constitution guarantees due process rights to all individuals, including noncitizens, regardless of immigration or legal status. The Fifth Amendment states that "no person...shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". This means that noncitizens facing deportation have a right to due process, which includes a hearing before a judge, the right to speak with a lawyer, and to have their attorney represent them in court. However, the right to legal counsel does not always apply, as most deportation proceedings are civil rather than criminal cases.

The US Constitution also guarantees noncitizens equal protection under the law. The Fourteenth Amendment states that the government cannot "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". This has been interpreted to mean that undocumented children cannot be prohibited from enrolling in public school. Additionally, in some places, noncitizens have been given the right to vote in local elections.

While the Constitution guarantees due process and equal protection rights to noncitizens, there are some caveats and complexities. For example, the "border search exception" allows searches at the border or ports of entry, which have long been upheld as reasonable by courts. Additionally, the Supreme Court has not definitively ruled on whether the First Amendment applies to noncitizens, particularly those with no legal status.

Furthermore, recent policies and executive actions, such as the Trump administration's "zero-tolerance" immigration policy, have made it more difficult for noncitizens to access their due process rights, such as limiting the authority of immigration judges and bypassing immigration courts.

Noncitizens' right to free speech

The US Constitution and its application to noncitizens in the country has been a subject of debate and legal interpretation. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention noncitizens, it uses the terms "people" and "person" in many parts, leaving room for interpretation. This ambiguity has led to discussions about the rights of noncitizens, including their right to free speech.

The First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees the freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. However, it does not specify whether these rights apply only to citizens or extend to noncitizens as well. The text refers to "the people," which could be interpreted to include all individuals within the country's jurisdiction, regardless of citizenship status. This interpretation is supported by Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who stated that "freedom of speech and of the press is accorded aliens residing in this country."

On the other hand, some argue that the First Amendment protections do not extend to noncitizens. Justice Antonin Scalia addressed claims of First Amendment violations by stating that "an alien unlawfully in this country has no constitutional right to assert selective enforcement as a defence against his deportation." This view suggests that noncitizens, especially those without legal status, may not have the same free speech rights as citizens.

The Supreme Court has not provided a definitive ruling on this matter, leaving the question open to interpretation. The legal status of noncitizens can also play a role in their First Amendment rights. For example, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 targeted certain speech and association activities by noncitizens, allowing for their deportation if they were associated with groups deemed terrorist organizations.

In practice, noncitizens in the US have exercised their right to free speech in various ways. Foreign students studying at US universities have the same free press rights as their American peers. Additionally, individuals on temporary visas or with legal residency status have criticized US foreign policy or advocated for political causes without facing punishment.

While there is no clear consensus, the interpretation of "the people" in the Constitution as including noncitizens provides a basis for recognizing their right to free speech. However, the legal status of the individual and the specific circumstances of each case may also come into play when determining the extent of their First Amendment rights.

Noncitizens' right to freedom of religion

The US Constitution and its amendments guarantee certain fundamental rights, including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the right to due process and equal protection under the law. The text of the Constitution refers to "the people" rather than "citizens", which has been interpreted to mean that these rights apply to everyone on US soil, regardless of citizenship. This interpretation has been supported by Rodriguez, who asserted that the laws apply to all those physically present in the US, and that many basic rights, such as freedom of religion, apply to citizens and noncitizens alike.

However, the question of whether the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of religion, applies to noncitizens is complex and remains unresolved. The Supreme Court has not issued a definitive ruling on this matter. While some legal scholars and federal judges argue that the First Amendment does not apply to unauthorized immigrants, others disagree, citing the Citizens United ruling, which opposed restrictions on political donations based on identity. The legal status of the individual in question may also play a role, as the Supreme Court has suggested that protections may only apply to immigrants who entered the country legally and have a "sufficient connection" to the US.

The right to freedom of religion for noncitizens has been challenged in specific cases. For example, in Reno v. American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, the federal government sought to deport members of a US-based Palestinian liberation group, who were legal residents but not citizens, on political grounds. While the government ultimately dropped the political grounds for deportation, the case highlighted the complexity of determining whether noncitizens have the same right to freedom of religion as citizens.

Additionally, the right to freedom of religion in the US has been interpreted to include the freedom to practice no religion at all. This interpretation ensures that the government cannot promote or encourage any particular religion and that individuals cannot be penalized for their religious beliefs or lack thereof.

In practice, the right to freedom of religion for noncitizens may vary depending on their legal status and the specific circumstances. While noncitizens may have the right to freedom of religion in theory, there may be practical limitations or exceptions, such as the border search exception, which allows searches at borders and ports of entry, that could potentially impact how this right is exercised and protected.

Explore related products

You Have The Right: A Constitutional Guide to Policing the Police

$9.99 $9.99

Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism

$25.96

Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal: Rights, Law, and Resistance against Territory’s Exclusions (Geographies of Justice and Social Transformation)

$9.24 $29.95

The Know Your Bill of Rights Workbook: Don't Lose Your Constitutional Rights--Learn Them!

$14.99

The Liberty of Non-citizens: Indefinite Detention in Commonwealth Countries (Hart Studies in Constitutional Law)

$108 $120

On the Record: Papers, Immigration, and Legal Advocacy

$34.85 $34.95

Noncitizens' right to a jury

The US Constitution and its amendments guarantee certain rights to "the people", "persons", or "everyone". However, there is legal ambiguity regarding the specific rights afforded to noncitizens, particularly those without legal status in the country.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial for criminal defendants. While this right is reserved for citizens, noncitizens are also entitled to jury trials for certain offences, including deportable offences, under the Sixth Amendment. In 2018, New York's highest court affirmed that immigrants are entitled to jury trials for offences that carry penalties of less than six months in jail. Prior to this ruling, immigrants facing charges such as prostitution were denied jury trials and, if convicted, were sometimes deported.

The right to a jury trial is a fundamental protection in the US justice system, allowing impartial peers to determine guilt or innocence for serious offences. Jury trials are an essential component of America's system of checks and balances, empowering citizens to participate in the judicial process and hold governments accountable.

While noncitizens are generally excluded from serving on juries, there are exceptions. In certain jurisdictions, such as San Francisco and Maryland, noncitizens are allowed to serve as jurors in limited capacities or for specific cases. These exceptions underscore the evolving nature of legal interpretations and local ordinances regarding noncitizens' rights.

The extent to which noncitizens can exercise their rights, including the right to a jury trial, is subject to ongoing legal debate and interpretation. The Supreme Court has not provided a definitive ruling on the matter, leaving room for varying interpretations at the state and local levels.

Noncitizens' right to vote

The right to vote is generally reserved for US citizens, and non-citizens, including permanent legal residents, cannot vote in federal, state, and most local elections. However, there are some exceptions, and at least 16 jurisdictions in the US permit non-citizens to vote in certain local elections, such as for school boards, city councils, or mayors.

The US Constitution does not explicitly prohibit anyone from voting. Instead, it outlines who cannot be denied the right to vote. The 14th Amendment grants voting rights to men who are US citizens and over the age of 21, unless they have committed a crime. The 15th Amendment prohibits denying the right to vote based on race, and the 19th Amendment prohibits denying it based on sex.

While the Constitution does not specify whether non-citizens are protected by the First Amendment, the term "people" or "person" is used in many parts of the Constitution, rather than "citizen". This has been interpreted to mean that certain rights, such as freedom of religion and speech, the right to due process, and equal protection under the law, apply to citizens and non-citizens alike.

In practice, however, the right to vote for non-citizens is complex and varies across different states and municipalities. While voter fraud by non-citizens is rare, there have been instances of non-citizens registering to vote, often by mistake. In 2022, a Georgia investigation found 1,634 incidents of non-citizens attempting to register to vote between 1997 and 2022, but these individuals were blocked until they could provide proof of citizenship.

Some states and municipalities have passed laws specifically permitting non-citizen voting in certain local elections. For example, in 2016, San Francisco passed Proposition N, which gave non-citizens the right to vote in the city's school board elections. This law was struck down by a San Francisco Superior Court Judge in 2022 as a violation of the state Constitution but was later overturned by a California Court of Appeal. Other municipalities that have allowed non-citizen voting in local elections include Chevy Chase Section 3, Riverdale Park, Somerset, Takoma Park, Edmonston, Chicago, and New York (until 2003).

In summary, while the US Constitution does not explicitly deny the right to vote to non-citizens, the practical application of this right varies across the country. Some jurisdictions have extended voting rights to non-citizens in local elections, while others maintain that voting is a right specifically reserved for citizens.

Frequently asked questions