Compromises Shaping The Us Constitution

The United States Constitution was created through a series of compromises among the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The delegates, representing 12 of the 13 original states, met in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation, which had been the governing document of the United States since the American Revolution. However, the delegates soon realized that a more comprehensive overhaul was needed, and they set out to create a new constitution. The Constitution was ultimately ratified by the required number of states and has served as the foundation of the United States federal government for over two centuries. The attendees of the convention had a fundamental disagreement over how to determine congressional representation, which necessitated the Great Compromise. While smaller states believed that each state should have equal representation, larger states thought that representation should be based on population. The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate.

Explore related products

The Taming of Free Speech: America’s Civil Liberties Compromise

$53 $53

Constitutional Convention of 1787, The: A Reference Guide (Guides to Historic Events in America)

$15.23 $29.95

Justice Robert H. Jackson's Unpublished Opinion in Brown v. Board: Conflict, Compromise, and Constitutional Interpretation

$49.99 $54.99

Noble Undertaking: Volume 1: The Continental Congress and the American Revolution, 1774–78

$14.21 $39.95

The Union As It Is: Constitutional Unionism and Sectional Compromise, 1787-1861

$63.31 $50

Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History (Princeton Studies in American Politics)

$29.95 $29.95

The Great Compromise: two chambers in Congress, proportional representation in the House, equal representation in the Senate

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a key agreement that helped shape the US Constitution. It addressed the contentious issue of congressional representation, which threatened to derail the Union. The delegates from the larger states argued for representation based on each state's population, while those from smaller states pushed for equal representation for each state.

The Great Compromise combined these two opposing plans. It established a bicameral legislature, with two chambers in Congress: the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate would provide equal representation for each state, while the House would be based on population, with proportional representation. This compromise ensured that smaller states had a voice in the Senate, while the overall representation in the House reflected the larger states' greater contribution of resources to the nation.

The Great Compromise was a significant agreement that resolved one of the most controversial aspects of the drafting of the Constitution. It allowed for the creation of a powerful central government, balancing the interests of both larger and smaller states. This compromise, along with others, such as the Three-Fifths Compromise and the agreement to delay the abolition of the slave trade, helped bridge the gaps between diverse interests and viewpoints, leading to the ratification of the Constitution and the formation of a new national government.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was another critical agreement that addressed the issue of how enslaved people would be counted for representation. This compromise stated that every five enslaved people would be counted as three individuals for representation purposes. While morally dubious, it was a concession made to the Southern states, which relied heavily on slavery and wanted to ensure their representation reflected the number of enslaved people they held.

The delegates also compromised on the issue of the slave trade. The Northern states, opposed to slavery, agreed to delay the abolition of the slave trade until 1808 to maintain the Union. During this period, the importation of enslaved people exceeded 200,000, a stark illustration of the compromise's impact. This delay allowed for a gradual transition and the formation of a stronger national government, even as it perpetuated the inhumane practice of slavery for two more decades.

Three-Fifths Compromise: each enslaved person counted as three-fifths of a person for representation

The Three-Fifths Compromise was one of the key compromises that helped create the U.S. Constitution. It was agreed upon during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention, which sought to revise the Articles of Confederation—the governing document of the United States since the American Revolution. The Three-Fifths Compromise specifically addressed the issue of how slaves would be counted in determining congressional representation.

The Southern states, which relied heavily on slavery, wanted each slave to be counted as a full person, thereby increasing their number of representatives in Congress. On the other hand, the Northern states, where the economy was industrialised and did not depend on slavery, did not want slaves to be counted at all. This disagreement threatened to tear the Union apart, as it had already caused strong divisions between the North and the South.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was the resolution reached, where each enslaved person was counted as three-fifths of an individual for representation purposes. This compromise reduced the representation of the slave states compared to the original proposals but gave them more power relative to the North. It also tied into taxation, reducing the tax burden on the slave states.

The Three-Fifths Compromise is considered morally dubious, reflecting the entrenched slavery system in the United States at the time. It has sparked ongoing debates among historians, legal scholars, and political scientists about whether it implied that slaves were seen as three-fifths of a person or if the designation was purely statistical. The compromise was officially repealed in 1868 by Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, and slavery was outlawed in the United States in 1865 by the 13th Amendment.

Commerce Compromise: federal government controls domestic and international trade, not the slave trade for 20 years

The Commerce Compromise was an agreement that addressed how the new federal government should regulate business. The delegates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, representing 12 of the 13 original states, debated the issue of federal regulation of commerce. Some states were worried that a central government with the authority to regulate commerce might unjustly favour some states over others. On the other hand, other states recognised the necessity of a central authority to control commerce to avoid trade conflicts and guarantee the efficient operation of the national economy.

The Commerce Compromise was a concession to the Southern states, allowing the continuation of the slave trade for 20 years. The Southern states, where slavery was pivotal to the economy, wanted to keep the slave trade going indefinitely. The Northern states, where the economy did not rely heavily on the enslavement of African people, wanted to end the slave trade immediately. The delegates agreed that Congress would have the authority to control domestic and international trade, but not the slave trade for at least 20 years.

The Commerce Compromise was a controversial agreement that revealed how deeply ingrained slavery was in the United States at the time. The delegates of the Constitutional Convention had differing interests and viewpoints on the issue of slavery, and the Commerce Compromise was a necessary compromise to bridge these gaps and form a new Union. While the Southern states wanted to protect the existing property rights of slaveholders, the Northern states wanted to block the expansion of slavery and did not want to write explicit protections for slavery into the Constitution.

The Commerce Compromise was a temporary solution to the contentious issue of slavery, and it was ultimately unsustainable. The issue of enslavement threatened to tear the Union apart during the Constitutional Convention, and it would later be a major cause of the Civil War. The Commerce Compromise was a reflection of the deep tension between the practice of slavery and the notion in the Declaration of Independence that "all men are created equal".

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention Of 1787: The Drafting Of The U.S. Constitution

$9.99

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking

$18.89 $47.99

A Fire Bell in the Past: The Missouri Crisis at 200, Volume I, Western Slavery, National Impasse (Studies in Constitutional Democracy Book 1)

$42.75 $45

A Hell of a Storm: The Battle for Kansas, the End of Compromise, and the Coming of the Civil War

$17.65 $32

A Fire Bell in the Past: The Missouri Crisis at 200, Volume II: “The Missouri Question” and Its Answers (Volume 2) (Studies in Constitutional Democracy)

$45 $45

Tariff Compromise: tariffs only on imports, not exports, with interstate commerce regulated by federal government

The United States Constitution was created through a series of compromises among the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The delegates, representing 12 of the 13 original states, met in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation, which had been the governing document since the American Revolution. However, they soon realised that a more comprehensive overhaul was needed, and they set out to create a new constitution.

One of the key compromises made during the creation of the US Constitution was the Tariff Compromise, which focused on interstate commerce and tariffs. The Northern states, with their industrialised economies, wanted the federal government to impose import tariffs on finished products from Britain to protect against foreign competition and encourage the South to buy goods from the North. The South, with its agricultural economy, relied on importing these finished goods and opposed tariffs that would increase their costs.

As a compromise, it was agreed that tariffs would only be imposed on imports, not exports, and that interstate commerce would be regulated by the federal government. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of the North and the South, protecting the North's burgeoning manufacturing industry while ensuring the South could still access necessary goods.

The Tariff Compromise was part of a broader set of agreements known as the Commerce Compromise, which granted Congress the authority to control domestic and international trade while leaving the slave trade unregulated for at least 20 years. This compromise was controversial, as some states feared central government authority over commerce might favour certain states over others. However, it was deemed necessary to avoid trade conflicts and ensure the efficient operation of the national economy.

The Constitution's enduring legacy, including over two centuries as the foundation of the US federal government, highlights the importance of compromise and negotiation in the democratic process.

Electoral College: electors proportional to population, voting for the president

The Founding Fathers established the Electoral College as a compromise between two schools of thought regarding the election of the President: election by a vote in Congress versus election by a popular vote of qualified citizens. The term "electoral college" does not appear in the Constitution, but the concept is enshrined in the document's Article II and the 12th Amendment, which refer to "electors".

The delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention debated how to elect the president for months. Some argued for Congress to pick the president, while others insisted on a democratic popular vote. The Electoral College was proposed as a compromise between these two positions. This system involves the creation of a temporary group of electors every four years, equal to the total number of representatives in Congress. These electors, not the American people, vote for the president.

The Three-Fifths Compromise, also known as the Three-Fifths Clause, was another compromise made during the Constitutional Convention. This compromise counted three-fifths of the enslaved Black population towards allocating representatives and electors and calculating federal taxes. This ensured that Southern states with large slave populations, such as Virginia, would ratify the Constitution. The Three-Fifths Compromise also increased pro-slavery strength in Congress, the presidency, and the Supreme Court.

The Great Compromise, also known as the Sherman Compromise or the Connecticut Compromise, was proposed by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut. This compromise addressed the disagreement over representation between larger and smaller states. It established a bicameral Congress with two national legislatures. The House of Representatives would be allocated according to each state's population and elected by the people, while the Senate would have equal representation for each state, regardless of its size, and state legislatures would choose Senators. This compromise ensured that smaller states would have equal representation in the Senate, which carries over into the Electoral College, preserving the interests of rural and small-town America.

Frequently asked questions