The Right To Secede: Exploring The Us Constitution

The United States Constitution and its amendments provide for the succession of executive power, with the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, as amended, outlining the presidential line of succession. The Constitution mentions the line of succession in four places, including Article II, Section 1, Clause 6, which authorises Congress to declare who should act as president if the president and vice president are unable to serve. The Twenty-fifth Amendment also addresses succession, providing for filling vice-presidential vacancies. The line of succession includes congressional officers and cabinet members, with the secretary of state being fourth in line. The succession process aims to ensure an orderly transfer of power, with designated survivors in place during events where other successors are gathered.

Explore related products

The U.S. Constitution and Secession: A Documentary Anthology of Slavery and White Supremacy

$29.99 $37.99

Creating a More Perfect Slaveholders' Union: Slavery, the Constitution, and Secession in Antebellum America (Constitutional Thinking)

$32.71 $59.99

Nullification, Secession, Webster's Argument, and the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions: Enriched edition. Considered in Reference to the Constitution and Historically

$2.99 $8.45

Civil War Documents: A Collection of Primary Sources: Ordinances of Secession, Confederate Constitution, Gettysburg Address, Emancipation Proclamation, Diaries and More

$12.99

Framing the Solid South: The State Constitutional Conventions of Secession, Reconstruction, and Redemption, 1860-1902

$29.99 $37.99

Secession!: Founding Documents of the Confederecy

$12.99

The Constitution does not explicitly mention secession

The absence of a clear mention of secession in the Constitution has led to differing interpretations and debates throughout American history. Some argue that the power to secede is inherent in the nature of the Union, as it was formed by sovereign states that delegated certain powers to a central government. On the other hand, others contend that the Constitution created a perpetual union, implying that secession is not a viable option.

One of the key principles of the Constitution is federalism, which establishes a system of divided powers between the states and the federal government. While not directly addressing secession, the Tenth Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, further emphasizes this balance of powers by stating that powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states or to the people.

Despite the lack of explicit mention, the Civil War played a significant role in shaping the understanding of secession. When several southern states attempted to secede and form the Confederate States of America, it led to a devastating conflict. The outcome of the war and the subsequent Reconstruction Amendments solidified the idea of an indissoluble Union, suggesting that secession was not a constitutional right.

While the Constitution does not directly address secession, it provides mechanisms for addressing disputes and political differences. Amendments can be proposed and ratified to address specific issues, and the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution and resolves disputes between states or between the states and the federal government. These mechanisms allow for a dynamic and adaptable framework capable of addressing evolving challenges without resorting to secession.

The Union argued that secession was treason

Secession, in the context of the United States, refers to the voluntary withdrawal of one or more states from the Union. The idea of secession has been a feature of American politics since its birth, with some arguing for it as a constitutional right and others as a natural right of revolution.

Despite these arguments, there were still those who advocated for secession. Historian Maury Klein highlighted the debate: was the United States a unified nation with indivisible sovereignty, or was it a federation of sovereign states that retained the right to withdraw? This ambiguity led to secessionist movements, particularly in the South, where states sought to preserve the institution of slavery and resist Northern interference.

The Confederate constitution reflected this sentiment, emphasizing the sovereign and independent character of each state within the Confederacy. However, the Union maintained that the Union was "perpetual," and the Confederate States of America was not recognized by the United States government.

The Union's decision not to try Confederate President Jefferson Davis for treason reflected a concern that the case would raise questions about the constitutionality of secession. There was a risk of acquittal, which could have signaled that the Union's war effort was unjustified. Thus, the Union argued that secession was treason, but the complexity of the issue and the potential political consequences influenced their legal strategy.

Secessionists claimed the Union was dissoluble

Secessionists have claimed that the Union was dissoluble, and that states retained a right to unilaterally secede from the United States. However, the Constitution of the United States makes no provision for secession. It does not contemplate its own destruction or the dissolution of the Government.

The Federalists, including James Madison, strongly opposed the argument that secession was permitted by the Constitution. Madison, often referred to as the "Father of the Constitution", sought a clause that would prohibit secession from the proposed union once the states had ratified the Constitution. In debate over other points, he repeatedly warned that secession or "disunion" was a major concern. In a letter to Daniel Webster, Madison discussed "revolution" versus "secession", stating:

> "I return my thanks for the copy of your late very powerful Speech in the Senate of the United S. It crushes 'nullification' and must hasten the abandonment of 'Secession'. But this dodges the blow by confounding the claim to secede at will, with the right of seceding from intolerable oppression. The former answers itself, being a violation, without cause, of a faith solemnly pledged. The latter is another name only for revolution, about which there is no theoretic controversy."

Despite this, some states have argued that the Union is a compact that can be annulled if the states are not satisfied with what they receive from other states or the federal government. For example, Mississippi claimed:

> "We must either submit to degradation, and to the loss of property worth four billions of money, or we must secede from the Union framed by our fathers, to secure this as well as every other species of property."

Similarly, South Carolina asserted that the Union states had:

> "...assumed the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States."

The most famous secessionist movement was the movement that dominated the Southern states of the United States, with eleven states accepting secession. These states formed a new nation, the Confederate States of America (CSA).

Explore related products

Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (Constitutional Thinking)

$26.39 $37.99

The Constitution of the Confederate States of America

$17.99

Red State - Red County Secession

$7.03 $7.99

A Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States (Optimized for Kindle)

$0.99

3- Pocket U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence (Three Pack)

$13.11 $19.99

Cato Institute 6- Pocket U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence (Six Pack)

$18.95

The Civil War ended secessionist hopes

The American Civil War was fought between the North and the South, with the Southern states seeking to preserve the institution of slavery. The war was triggered by a secessionist movement, with Southern states declaring their secession from the Union. South Carolina was the first state to do so in December 1860, later joining with other Southern states to form the Confederacy. The legality of secession was hotly debated in the 19th century, with no direct mention of it in the Constitution. However, the Civil War ended any hopes of secession.

The Confederacy sought to win independence by outlasting Lincoln, but after Atlanta fell and Lincoln defeated McClellan in the election of 1864, the hope for a political victory for the South ended. Lincoln secured the support of the Republicans, War Democrats, border states, emancipated slaves, and the neutrality of Britain and France. The war devastated the South, destroying much of its wealth, including the value of enslaved people. The Confederacy's hopes of aid from Britain and France were dashed by the Emancipation Proclamation, which symbolized the Union's growing commitment to emancipation.

The Union's victory in the Civil War established the idea of an indestructible union, interpreted by the Supreme Court as something that could not be dissolved. This stance was solidified in the Post-Civil War period. Historian Maury Klein noted that one of the most important results of the Civil War was the destruction of the idea of secession. The war demonstrated that the Union was perpetual and could not be dissolved, as Lincoln had argued.

While the Civil War ended secessionist hopes, the idea of secession has not disappeared from American political discussion. Even in modern times, there have been movements and efforts for states to secede from the Union. However, none of these threats have been successful, and it is clear that constitutionally, there can be no such thing as secession. The Constitution provides for amendments and prescribes how they may be made, but it does not contemplate its own destruction or the dissolution of the Government.

Secession debates continue to this day

Secession debates in the United States date back to the 19th century. The Federalist Party explored the idea of New England secession during the War of 1812, and historian Richard Buell Jr. notes that there was a "secessionist movement" in 1804. Founding Father Gouverneur Morris, a primary author of the Constitution, claimed that "secession, under certain circumstances, was entirely constitutional". However, James Madison, often referred to as "The Father of the Constitution", strongly opposed this argument.

The legality of secession was a contentious issue during the American Civil War, with Southern states seeking to preserve the institution of slavery and states' rights. After the Civil War, the Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution as an indestructible union, and in Texas v. White (1869), it established that states cannot unilaterally secede.

Despite this, secession debates have continued into modern times. Following Barack Obama's re-election in 2012, petitions to secede from the United States gained traction, with all 50 states having petitions and Texas gaining the most signatures. These petitions prompted counter-petitions and responses from state governors and elected officials, most of whom rejected the notion of secession.

The idea of secession has also been interpreted in the context of migration movements, such as the American Redoubt, which proposes a safe haven for conservative Christians in certain states. Additionally, there have been attempts by cities and communities to secede from larger urban areas, such as Staten Island's effort to break away from New York City in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

While the Constitution does not directly mention secession, the debate surrounding it persists, with some arguing for the natural right of the people to separate themselves from oppressors, while others emphasize the perpetual union established by the Founders.

Frequently asked questions