
The ratification of the new US Constitution was a highly contested issue, with smaller states like Delaware in favour, and larger states like New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia against. The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay under the pseudonym Publius, were a key tool for the Federalists, articulating arguments in favour of ratification and addressing Anti-Federalist concerns.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Smaller states | Delaware |
| Equal representation in the Senate | Would give smaller states equality with larger states |
| Strong national government with an army | Would be better able to defend smaller states than their state militias |
| Larger states | New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia |
| Federal government | Not needed by larger states |
| Tax money | Larger states disliked the prospect of having to provide tax money to support the new government |
| Supporters of the Constitution | Hamilton, Madison, Jay |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- Smaller states, like Delaware, were in favour of the Constitution
- The Federalist Papers were a key tool for the Federalists
- Supporters of the Constitution feared New York would refuse to ratify it
- Supporters of the Constitution feared Massachusetts would refuse to ratify it
- Supporters of the Constitution feared Pennsylvania would refuse to ratify it

Smaller states, like Delaware, were in favour of the Constitution
Smaller, less populous states, like Delaware, were in favour of ratifying the new Constitution. Delaware ratified the document within a few months of it being sent for approval in 1787. This was because smaller states favoured the protection of a strong federal government.
The process of ratification was not smooth, with significant opposition in several states. Patrick Henry, George Mason and Samuel Adams were among those who argued against ratification of the Constitution in its current form. They criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights, arguing that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties.
However, Hamilton, Madison and Jay (under the pseudonym "Publius") wrote a series of 85 essays known as "The Federalist Papers", which were a key tool for the Federalists. These essays articulated arguments in favour of ratification and addressed Anti-Federalist concerns.
In the end, 38 out of 41 delegates signed the new Constitution. Under Article VII, it was agreed that the document would not be binding until its ratification by nine of the 13 existing states.
Persuasion for the Constitution: Ratification's Written Legacy
You may want to see also

The Federalist Papers were a key tool for the Federalists
The Federalist Papers were a crucial part of the debate over the ratification of the Constitution, which played out in newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings across the country. Each state held a special convention to debate and vote on ratification, and the process was far from smooth, with significant opposition in several states.
Smaller states, like Delaware, generally favoured the Constitution. This was because equal representation in the Senate would give them a degree of equality with the larger states, and a strong national government with an army at its command would be better able to defend them than their state militias could.
However, larger states had significant power to lose. They did not believe they needed the federal government to defend them and disliked the prospect of having to provide tax money to support the new government. As a result, supporters of the Constitution feared that New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia would refuse to ratify it.
The Evolution of Pennsylvania's Constitution: Section 9's Ratification
You may want to see also

Supporters of the Constitution feared New York would refuse to ratify it
Supporters of the Constitution feared that New York would refuse to ratify it. Smaller states, like Delaware, were in favour of the Constitution. Equal representation in the Senate would give them a degree of equality with the larger states, and a strong national government with an army at its command would be better able to defend them than their state militias could. However, larger states, such as New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Virginia, had significant power to lose. They did not believe they needed the federal government to defend them and disliked the prospect of having to provide tax money to support the new government.
The debate played out in newspapers, pamphlets and public meetings across the country. The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays written by Hamilton, Madison and Jay under the pseudonym "Publius", were a key tool for the Federalists, articulating arguments in favour of ratification and addressing Anti-Federalist concerns. Each state held a special convention to debate and vote on ratification. The process was far from smooth, with significant opposition in several states.
Hamilton and James Madison led the lobbying efforts for votes in favour of ratifying the Constitution. With assistance from John Jay, they produced the 85 essays known as "The Federalist Papers" that explained and defended how the proposed new government would function. The initial purpose of the Convention was for the delegates to amend the Articles of Confederation; however, the ultimate outcome was the proposal and creation of a completely new form of government.
The supporters of the Constitution feared that New York would refuse to ratify it, as it was a large state with significant power to lose. They did not believe that they needed the federal government to defend them and disliked the prospect of having to provide tax money to support the new government. The Federalist Papers were a key tool in the debate, with supporters of the Constitution using them to articulate their arguments and address the concerns of those opposed to ratification.
The Constitution's Ratification: 1789's Defining Moment
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Supporters of the Constitution feared Massachusetts would refuse to ratify it
Supporters of the Constitution feared that Massachusetts would refuse to ratify it. Smaller, less populous states were in favour of the Constitution and the protection of a strong federal government. Delaware and New Jersey ratified the document within a few months of it being sent to them for approval in 1787. Connecticut ratified it early in 1788. However, Massachusetts was a larger state and there was no guarantee that it would follow suit.
Indeed, there was significant opposition to the Constitution in several states. Patrick Henry, George Mason and Samuel Adams argued against ratification of the Constitution in its current form, criticising the absence of a Bill of Rights. The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay under the pseudonym "Publius", were a key tool for the Federalists, articulating arguments in favour of ratification and addressing Anti-Federalist concerns.
Massachusetts eventually became the sixth member of the newly formed federal union on 6 February 1788. This was less than a month after a Massachusetts Sentinel cartoon encouraged the state's voters to join Georgia and neighbouring Connecticut in ratifying the Constitution.
Federalists' Strategies to Secure Constitution Ratification Votes
You may want to see also

Supporters of the Constitution feared Pennsylvania would refuse to ratify it
Supporters of the Constitution feared that Pennsylvania would refuse to ratify it. Pennsylvania was one of the larger states, and it was thought that it might not vote in favour of the new government. Smaller, less populous states were more likely to favour the Constitution, as it offered the protection of a strong federal government.
The debate over ratification played out in newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings across the country. The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay under the pseudonym "Publius", were a key tool for the Federalists, articulating arguments in favour of ratification and addressing Anti-Federalist concerns. Each state held a special convention to debate and vote on ratification. The process was far from smooth, with significant opposition in several states.
Hamilton and James Madison led the lobbying efforts for votes in favour of ratifying the Constitution. With assistance from John Jay, they produced the 85 essays known as "The Federalist Papers" that explained and defended how the proposed new government would function. The essays encouraged states to join Georgia and Connecticut in ratifying the Constitution. Less than a month later, on February 6, 1788, Massachusetts became the sixth member of the newly formed federal union.
Delaware and New Jersey ratified the document within a few months of receiving it for approval in 1787. Connecticut ratified it early in 1788. Some of the larger states, such as Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, also voted in favour of the new government.
Constitutional Ratification: Florida's Percent Rule Explained
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Smaller states, like Delaware, were in favour of ratifying the new constitution.
Equal representation in the Senate would give smaller states a degree of equality with the larger states. A strong national government with an army at its command would also be better able to defend them than their state militias could.
Supporters of the constitution feared that New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia would refuse to ratify it.
Larger states had significant power to lose. They did not believe they needed the federal government to defend them and disliked the prospect of having to provide tax money to support the new government.
Hamilton and James Madison led the lobbying efforts for votes in favour of ratifying the constitution.
























