The Missing Voices At The Constitutional Convention

The Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia in 1787, was a significant event in American history that addressed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The convention was marked by the absence of several key groups, including enslaved individuals, women, and free men of color. Their exclusion from discussions about their rights and status highlights significant inequalities in the formation of the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, prominent political figures such as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Patrick Henry were also absent, further emphasizing the limitations of representation at the convention.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.92 $8.95

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$12.29 $22

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

The Constitutional Convention of 1787: Constructing the American Republic (Reacting to the Past™)

$19.99 $32.5

Madison’s Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention

$26 $26

Enslaved individuals

The Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia in 1787, was a significant event in American history that addressed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The convention was marked by the absence of several groups, including enslaved individuals, who were not represented despite being a key topic of discussion.

The Three-Fifths Compromise, or the three-fifths clause, was a compromise agreed upon by the convention. It stated that three-fifths of enslaved people in each state would count towards congressional representation, which increased the number of congressional seats in the South. This gave Southern states extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. The delegates from North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia strongly argued for the slave trade to continue, threatening to disunite from the Union if it were prohibited.

The controversy over the Atlantic slave trade was settled by a compromise: in exchange for a 20-year ban on any restrictions on the trade, Southern delegates agreed to remove a clause restricting the national government's power to enact laws requiring goods to be shipped on American vessels. The convention also debated whether to allow the new federal government to ban the importation of enslaved people, ultimately agreeing to allow Congress to ban it after 20 years. This was one of the only clauses of the Constitution that could not be amended.

The rights and status of enslaved individuals were not directly considered in decision-making processes, and their exclusion from the convention highlights significant inequalities in the formation of the U.S. Constitution.

Women

The absence of women at the convention highlights significant inequalities in the formation of the U.S. Constitution. While the framers debated issues of governance, women were completely excluded from the discussions that would determine their rights and status. This exclusion demonstrates the restrictive nature of representation at the convention, as many groups impacted by the Constitution's outcomes had no voice in its creation.

Despite being excluded from the convention, women did influence the framing of the Constitution. The final document included language that, while not allowing women to actively participate, did not shut them out of citizenship and future discussions. For example, the delegates chose to use the word "persons" instead of "men," indicating that women were implicitly included in the Constitution. Additionally, women like Elizabeth Willing Powel were present in Philadelphia during the convention and interacted with key figures such as Benjamin Franklin.

It is important to note that the issue of gender was not a focus of the convention, and there is no record of any discussion about women's rights or duties. However, gender was inadvertently introduced into the conversation when the term "sex" was mentioned in the context of representing slave property. This inclusion of "sex" or "gender" in the discussion had important implications for government and political thought, even if they were not fully recognized at the time.

The exclusion of women from the Constitutional Convention reflects the societal norms and political theories of the time, which often viewed government as representing only independent men with sufficient property. However, some women during the Enlightenment put forward the idea that women had equal capacity and could successfully participate in constitutional government. It would take decades, however, for women to gain the right to vote and fully participate in the political process.

Free men of colour

The Constitutional Convention of 1787, held in Philadelphia, was a significant event in American history. The convention was aimed at addressing the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and drawing up a new scheme of government. However, the convention was marked by the absence of several groups, including free men of colour, enslaved individuals, and women.

While the framers of the Constitution debated issues of governance and the rights and status of enslaved individuals, free men of colour were completely excluded from these discussions. This exclusion is particularly notable given that the rights and freedoms of free men of colour were likely to be impacted by the decisions made at the convention. The lack of representation for free men of colour underscores the limitations placed on representation at the Constitutional Convention.

The absence of free men of colour at the Constitutional Convention can be seen in the context of broader racial inequalities and the exclusion of non-white individuals from political life in the 18th century. Historical records indicate that the majority of the prominent attendees at the convention were white, landowning men, further illustrating the significant gap in representation. This lack of diversity among the delegates had a significant impact on the content of the discussions and the resulting Constitution.

The exclusion of free men of colour from the Constitutional Convention had lasting consequences for the rights and freedoms of this group in the United States. Their absence from the convention contributed to the lack of representation and protection for free men of colour in the nation's laws and governance. This highlights the importance of ensuring inclusive and diverse representation in political processes, as the exclusion of certain groups can lead to inequalities and injustices in the resulting policies and laws.

Explore related products

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison, a Member

$0.99 $99

Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787

$18 $18

The Struggle for Land Under Israeli Law: An Architecture of Exclusion

$28 $55.99

1787: The Grand Convention

$15.65 $28.95

Secret Proceedings and Debates of the Constitutional Convention, 1787

$32.55

Children's Rights and the Law: An Introduction

$40.27 $52.99

Key political figures

The Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia in 1787, was a significant event in American history. It aimed to address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and establish a stronger central government. However, several key political figures were notably absent, including Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Patrick Henry. These individuals were absent due to diplomatic duties or, in the case of Henry, a conscious boycott due to his opposition to the convention's intentions and his distrust of centralised government.

George Washington played a pivotal role in the convention as its elected president. He provided a sense of focus and direction to the proceedings, helping to oversee the debates and shape the vision of a stronger union. Washington was concerned about the concentration of power in the federal government and the convention's reluctance to end the slave trade.

James Madison, often referred to as the "Father of the Constitution," made significant contributions to the convention. Madison's ideas and proposals formed the basis of the final document, blending his "national" constitution vision with the desired "federal" constitution sought by many delegates. He was instrumental in defining the powers of Congress and ensuring that the small states' interests were represented.

Benjamin Franklin, a renowned statesman and one of the nation's Founding Fathers, was also present at the convention. Franklin brought his wealth of experience and wisdom to the discussions. While his exact contributions are not extensively documented, his presence and influence undoubtedly carried weight in shaping the final Constitution.

Other key political figures at the convention included James Wilson, who advocated for a single executive with absolute veto power, and Roger Sherman, who proposed the "Connecticut Compromise" or the "Great Compromise." This compromise addressed representation concerns by establishing the House of Representatives based on proportional representation and the Senate, where each state had equal representation.

The absence of certain key political figures and the participation of others significantly shaped the outcome of the Constitutional Convention. The resulting Constitution, with its compromises and amendments, laid the foundation for the United States government and the nation's future.

Small states

The Constitutional Convention of 1787, held in Philadelphia, was a significant event in American history. The convention addressed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and drafted the United States Constitution. While the convention included notable delegates, several key groups and individuals were notably absent.

The small states' concerns and interests were not adequately addressed during the discussions that shaped the U.S. Constitution. The final committee appointed to revise and arrange the agreed-upon articles did not include any champions of the small states. This exclusion highlighted the limitations of representation at the convention and the inequalities in the founding of the United States government.

The delegates from small states wanted assurances that they would be adequately represented in the new government. Once they were assured of their representation, they strongly supported a strong national government. This compromise allowed for the creation of a federal government with a system of checks and balances, ensuring that no single branch would become too powerful.

In summary, while small states were present at the Constitutional Convention, they faced challenges in ensuring their representation and influence in the formation of the U.S. government. Their efforts contributed to the establishment of a balanced governmental structure that addressed their concerns about equal representation.

Frequently asked questions