The Constitution: A Flawed Foundation?

The main issue with the first American constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was its establishment of a very weak central government. The Articles gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, and couldn't print money. This led to disputes between the states over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, threatening to tear the young country apart. The delegates at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 debated the relative powers of the federal government and the states, ultimately compromising by allotting specific responsibilities to the federal government while delegating all other functions to the states.

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

1787: The Grand Convention

$15.65 $28.95

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison, a Member

$0.99 $99

Lack of enforcement powers

The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers. This meant that Congress lacked the authority to regulate commerce, print money, or conduct foreign policy without the voluntary agreement of the states.

The lack of enforcement powers led to several issues. Firstly, Congress was unable to raise funds or collect taxes to fund its operations, as it relied on the voluntary efforts of the states to send tax money. This resulted in a lack of funds for the central government, impacting its ability to maintain an effective military and back its own currency.

Secondly, the lack of enforcement powers allowed states to conduct their own foreign policies and compete economically against each other. States issued their own currencies and levied taxes on each other's goods, making trade between states and with other countries extremely difficult.

Additionally, the central government's lack of enforcement powers meant it struggled to address internal rebellions, such as Shays' rebellion in 1786 and 1787. The government had to rely on state militias, further highlighting its weakness and inability to enforce its authority.

The lack of enforcement powers also contributed to delays and inefficiencies in Congress. The weakness of Congress under the Articles of Confederation led many delegates to focus more on state politics and their personal affairs rather than the nation's legislative body. This resulted in frustrating delays and a lack of attendance, further hindering the effectiveness of the central government.

Inability to regulate commerce

The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states. However, it had no enforcement powers, and crucially, it couldn't regulate commerce. This inability to regulate trade and manage state economies was a significant weakness.

Under the Articles, individual states competed against each other economically. They issued their own currencies and levied taxes on each other's goods when they crossed state lines. This led to economic rivalry and hindered the country's overall economic growth. The central government couldn't collect taxes effectively to fund its operations and had to rely on voluntary contributions from the states. Without a common currency, trade between states and with foreign nations was challenging.

Recognizing this issue, Congress requested limited power over commerce in 1784, but many states did not comply. James Monroe, a delegate, stressed the need for increased congressional power over commerce, and a committee was formed to investigate. In 1785, the committee recommended amending the Articles to grant Congress power over commerce, but few states responded. The states' reluctance to cede power over commerce to Congress highlighted their desire to maintain economic autonomy, even at the expense of national economic cohesion.

The inability to regulate commerce was a critical issue that contributed to the Articles of Confederation's failure. It led to economic fragmentation, hindered the central government's ability to raise funds, and ultimately, threatened to tear the young nation apart. This issue was addressed in the new Constitution, which established a stronger central government with the power to regulate commerce and manage the economy, fostering greater economic unity and stability.

Lack of specific protection against tyranny

The United States Constitution is one of the longest-lived and most emulated constitutions in the world. However, one of its main criticisms during its creation was its lack of specific protection against tyranny. This concern was particularly prominent among the Anti-Federalists, who demanded a more concise and unequivocal Constitution. They believed that the document should clearly lay out the rights of the people and the limitations of the government's power.

One of the key figures among the Anti-Federalists was Patrick Henry, who criticised the proposed Constitution for its vagueness and lack of safeguards against tyranny. He questioned the effectiveness of its checks and balances in preventing the government from overreaching its authority. Richard Henry Lee, another prominent Anti-Federalist, lamented the absence of provisions to protect "those essential rights of mankind without which liberty cannot exist." He argued that transitioning to a new government without a bill of rights would be a futile attempt to trade one problem for another.

The concern for specific protection against tyranny was understandable, given the context of the young nation's recent history. Just a few years after the Revolutionary War, the country found itself on the brink of collapse due to the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which served as America's first constitution. Under the Articles, the central government lacked the power to effectively govern and was dependent on the voluntary cooperation of the states. It struggled to raise funds, regulate trade, conduct foreign policy, and maintain a unified monetary system.

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 recognised the need for a stronger central government while also addressing concerns about tyranny. They compromised by allocating specific responsibilities to the federal government while leaving all other functions to the states. This compromise aimed to balance the need for a more effective government with the desire to prevent the concentration of power that could potentially lead to tyranny.

In conclusion, the criticism of the Constitution's lack of specific protection against tyranny reflected the delicate balance between establishing a functional government and safeguarding against the abuse of power. The Anti-Federalists' concerns led to ongoing debates and amendments to the Constitution, ensuring that the document remained a dynamic framework for the nation's governance.

Explore related products

Madison’s Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention

$26 $26

Debates and Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Delaware

$33.75

The Constitutional Convention of 1787: Constructing the American Republic (Reacting to the Past™)

$19.99 $32.5

Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787

$18 $18

The Records Of The Federal Convention Of 1787, Issue 2

$32.95

Reclaiming America: through Single Issue Federal Conventions

$19.95

Weak central government

The United States Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, by 38 delegates, creating a powerful central government. However, the previous version, the Articles of Confederation, had established a very weak central government, which was one of its main limitations.

The Articles of Confederation gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. The central government couldn't collect taxes to fund its operations and had to rely on voluntary efforts from the states. This meant that the government lacked funds to maintain an effective military or back its own currency.

The Articles Congress had only one chamber, and each state had one vote, reinforcing the power of the states to operate independently from the central government. Congress needed nine out of thirteen states to pass any laws, making it very difficult to pass legislation that would affect all thirteen states.

The states also had their own money systems, which made trade between them and other countries extremely difficult. The central government couldn't regulate trade or conduct foreign policy without the voluntary agreement of the states.

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 compromised by allotting specific responsibilities to the federal government while delegating all other functions to the states.

Difficulty passing legislation

The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, faced several issues that made it difficult to pass legislation.

Firstly, the Articles established a very weak central government with limited powers. It lacked an executive official or a judicial branch, and the Confederation Congress had no enforcement powers, making it difficult to regulate commerce, conduct foreign policy, or raise funds. The central government couldn't collect taxes from the states to fund its operations and had to rely on voluntary contributions. This led to financial difficulties, impacting its ability to maintain a military or support its currency.

Secondly, the Articles gave significant power to the individual states, allowing them to operate independently. Each state had one vote in Congress, reinforcing their independence. Moreover, the requirement for a supermajority of nine out of thirteen states to pass laws made it challenging to enact legislation that would affect all states. The states often pursued their economic interests, issuing their own currencies and taxing each other's goods, which hindered interstate trade.

Thirdly, amending the Articles was incredibly challenging due to the requirement for unanimous consent from all thirteen states. This made it nearly impossible to adapt the Articles to the changing needs of the nation, especially after the war with Britain ended in 1783.

Additionally, there were rivalries and disputes between the states over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade. These disputes threatened to tear the young country apart and made it challenging to reach consensus on legislation.

Finally, the delegates at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, including George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton, debated the balance of power between the federal government and the states. While some believed the federal government should have the power to overrule state laws, others feared a strong federal government would oppress citizens. This disagreement made it challenging to pass legislation that balanced the interests of both parties.

Frequently asked questions