Opposition To The Constitution: The Anti-Federalists' Fight

The Anti-Federalists were the major opposition to the ratification of the US Constitution in 1787. They believed that the new Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, threatening individual liberties. The Anti-Federalists were composed of small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers, and they generally agreed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments. They also believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that the federal government would become tyrannous without a Bill of Rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution to protect Americans' civil liberties.

Explore related products

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$13.66 $23

Chen Jiongming and the Federalist Movement: Regional Leadership and Nation Building in Early Republican China (Volume 86) (Michigan Monographs In Chinese Studies)

$60

Revolutionary Brotherhood: Freemasonry and the Transformation of the American Social Order, 1730-1840 (Published by the Omohundro Institute of Early American ... and the University of North Carolina Press)

$16.19 $29.99

Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia [2 volumes]

$201

Allegiance to Liberty: The Changing Face of Patriots, Militias, and Political Violence in America

$53 $58.5

For the People: American Populist Movements from the Revolution to the 1850s

$25.99 $39.95

Anti-Federalists believed the new government would threaten individual liberties

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The Constitution, drafted in the summer of 1787, needed to be ratified by at least nine of the 13 state legislatures. The Anti-Federalists believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of the states. They believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that this resemblance would produce courts of intrigue in the nation's capital.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. They were chiefly concerned with too much power invested in the national government at the expense of states. They believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one. They also believed that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous.

The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

During the period of debate over the ratification of the Constitution, numerous independent local speeches and articles were published across the country. Many of the articles in opposition were written under pseudonyms, such as "Brutus" (likely Melancton Smith), "Centinel" (likely Samuel Bryan), and "Federal Farmer". Eventually, famous revolutionary figures such as Patrick Henry came out publicly against the Constitution. They argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the president would become a king.

The unitary president resembled a monarch

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that this resemblance would eventually produce courts of intrigue in the nation's capital. They worried that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy.

The Anti-Federalists believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of the states. They thought that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one. They also believed that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous.

The opposition to the Constitution by the Anti-Federalists was strong in many states, with Delaware, Georgia, and New Jersey being the exceptions, ratifying quickly with little controversy. In Rhode Island, resistance against the Constitution was so strong that civil war almost broke out on July 4, 1788, when anti-federalist members of the Country Party led by Judge William West marched into Providence with over 1,000 armed protesters.

The Federalists, supporters of the Constitution, argued that the Anti-Federalists were offering solutions to the problems under the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists included men of property, creditors, and those who believed that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate. The Federalists enlisted the help of Madison, and in late 1787, they published the first of a series of essays now known as the Federalist Papers. The 85 essays, most of which were penned by Alexander Hamilton himself, probed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and the need for an energetic national government.

The original draft of the Constitution did not have a Bill of Rights

The original draft of the US Constitution, written in the summer of 1787, did not include a Bill of Rights. This was one of the primary reasons for the opposition to the Constitution, with the critics of the document becoming known as Anti-Federalists.

The Anti-Federalists believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, rather than a federal one. They argued that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of the states. They also believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that this resemblance would eventually produce courts of intrigue in the nation's capital.

The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties. They also believed that the central government under the Articles of Confederation was sufficient, and that while the national government under the Articles was too weak, the national government under the Constitution would be too strong.

The Federalists, supporters of the Constitution, argued that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate and that an energetic national government was needed. They also promised to add amendments to the Constitution specifically protecting individual liberties. James Madison, initially against having a Bill of Rights, introduced 12 amendments during the First Congress in 1789. The states ratified 10 of these, which took effect in 1791 and are known today collectively as the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

Nullification Objections: Dismantling the Opposition

$6.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History (Princeton Studies in American Politics)

$29.95 $29.95

Decius's Letters on the Opposition to the New Constitution in Virginia, 1789.

$20.75

Les Principes De La Foi Sur Le Gouvernement De L'Eglise, En Opposition Avec La Constitution Civile Du Clerge: Ou Refutation Du Developpement De L'Opinion De M. Camus (1791)

$25.95

The Federalists were building momentum but knew the main opposition would come from Anti-Federalists

The Federalists were building momentum toward the nine states they needed for the ratification of the Constitution, but they knew that the main opposition would come from Anti-Federalists in large and powerful states, including Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. The Anti-Federalists were mounting an effective opposition in essays and debates, with some demanding prior amendments to be sent to a second convention. They believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of states. They also believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that the federal government would become tyrannous without a Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties. They believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one.

The Federalists, on the other hand, supported the Constitution and argued against the necessity of a bill of rights. They included commercial interests, men of property, creditors, and those who believed that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate. They had support from influential figures such as George Washington.

The debate over the ratification of the Constitution led to a political split between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, with each side publishing essays and articles to support their positions. The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and Madison, defended the Constitution and argued for the need for a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, published essays under pseudonyms like Brutus, Cato, and the Federal Farmer, critiquing the Constitution and arguing for the protection of individual liberties.

The opposition from the Anti-Federalists was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights, with James Madison reluctantly agreeing to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach upon. The Bill of Rights, which includes the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to due process under the law, was eventually ratified by the states and took effect in 1791.

The opposition believed the central government under the Articles of Confederation was sufficient

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the central government under the Articles of Confederation was sufficient and that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, threatening the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, and individuals. They saw the proposed government as a new centralized and "monarchic" power that resembled the governance of Great Britain, which they had recently fought to cast off. They argued that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, not a federal one, and that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous.

The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties. They were concerned that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. They also objected to the federal court system created by the proposed constitution.

The opposition to the Constitution was strong in many states, with Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia being particularly influential in the debate. Anti-Federalists in these three states made ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights. In Massachusetts, arguments between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists erupted in a physical brawl between Elbridge Gerry and Francis Dana. Sensing that Anti-Federalist sentiment would sink ratification efforts, James Madison reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach.

The Federalist Papers, a collection of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and Madison, defended the US Constitution and probed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Thomas Jefferson later called them the "best commentary on the principles of government ever written." The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, published essays under pseudonyms like Brutus, Cato, and the Federal Farmer in New York newspapers critiquing the Constitution.

Frequently asked questions