The Constitutional Question: Participants' Queries

The Constitutional Convention, held to outline the framework of the United States government, raised several constitutional questions. These included the method of selecting the president, the role of the federal government versus state governments, and the issue of slavery. The delegates debated and compromised on these topics, shaping the foundation of the country's political system. Queries regarding the signing process, the role of the Supreme Court, and the powers of Congress have also been addressed, with answers rooted in historical context and legal provisions.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$238.55 $359

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.32 $126.95

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Who appoints deputies to the Constitutional Convention?

The deputies to the Constitutional Convention were appointed by the legislatures of the different states. There were no restrictions on the number of deputies a state could send. However, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations did not send any deputies, and the other twelve states were not represented throughout the Constitutional Convention.

The Constitutional Convention was held to address issues with the Articles of Confederation, which many Americans agreed needed to be amended by 1786. The Convention debated various topics, including the role of the federal government, the selection of the president, slavery, and the free flow of commerce across state lines. The deputies themselves debated proposed plans and appointed committees to draft and revise the Constitution.

The original states, except Rhode Island, collectively appointed 70 individuals to the Constitutional Convention. However, several of these individuals did not accept or were unable to attend, resulting in 55 delegates attending the sessions. Of these 55 delegates, only 39 signed the Constitution. The delegates ranged in age from 26 to 81.

The Constitutional Convention played a crucial role in shaping the United States government and addressing the concerns of the time. The deputies, appointed by the state legislatures, worked through debates and compromises to create a governing document that would guide the young nation.

Restrictions on the number of deputies per state

The deputies to the Constitutional Convention were appointed by the legislatures of the different states. There were no restrictions on the number of deputies a state might send. However, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations did not send any deputies to the Convention. This meant that only twelve states were represented, and there was never a vote of more than eleven states.

The deputies themselves were referred to by different names, including "deputies" and "delegates." For example, Washington signed his name as "deputy from Virginia," while Benjamin Franklin, of Pennsylvania, was known as the "Sage of the Constitutional Convention." James Madison, of Virginia, was called the "Father of the Constitution."

The deputies debated various issues, including the method of selecting the president, the role of the federal government, and the issue of slavery. They agreed on the Electoral College as the method of selecting the president, aware that George Washington would be the first president. They also compromised by assigning specific responsibilities to the federal government while leaving other functions to the states.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was another important issue debated by the deputies. This compromise provided that three-fifths (60%) of enslaved people in each state would count toward congressional representation, increasing the number of congressional seats in several states, particularly in the South. Additionally, they discussed whether to allow the federal government to ban the importation of enslaved people, ultimately agreeing to give Congress the power to do so after 20 years.

Which states didn't send deputies?

The Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia, was attended by deputies from 12 states. Rhode Island and Providence Plantations were the only states that did not send deputies to the convention.

The deputies at the convention were appointed by the legislatures of the different states, and there were no restrictions on the number of deputies that could be sent. The deputies debated and voted on various issues, such as the method of selecting the president, the role of the federal government, and the issue of slavery. The term "deputies" was used interchangeably with "delegates" and "commissioners" to refer to the representatives of the states.

The Constitutional Convention was a significant event in the history of the United States, as it led to the creation of the Constitution, which established the framework for the country's government and political system. The deputies debated and compromised on various issues to ensure that the rights of both the small and large states were protected.

The Annapolis Convention, held in 1786, was another event that discussed the defects of the federal government. Twelve delegates from five U.S. states (New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Virginia) attended this convention. However, it is unclear if any states did not send deputies to this particular convention, as the sources only mention the states that were represented.

The Constitutional Convention and the Annapolis Convention were important gatherings that shaped the political landscape of the United States. While the Constitutional Convention resulted in the creation of the Constitution, the Annapolis Convention focused on addressing the issues within the federal government structure.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism

$59.81 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$95 $345

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$23.73 $74.95

Can members of the President's Cabinet sit in Congress?

The US Constitution does not allow members of the President's Cabinet to sit in Congress. According to Article 1, Section 6, Clause 2 of the Constitution, a national officeholder cannot simultaneously be a member of either House of Congress. The Cabinet's role, as established in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, is to advise the President on any subject relating to the duties of each member's respective office.

The Cabinet comprises 26 members: the vice president, 15 department heads, and 10 Cabinet-level officials. The vice president does not have any authority over the president's cabinet, and all cabinet officials report directly to the president, who can dismiss them from office at any time without Senate approval. The heads of executive departments and senior federal officers at the cabinet or sub-cabinet level receive their salaries under a fixed five-level pay plan, known as the Executive Schedule, which is codified in Title 5 of the United States Code.

While the Cabinet does not have any collective executive powers or functions, its members play a crucial role in advising the President and shaping policy. The President has the authority to appoint and dismiss Cabinet members, and these appointments are generally made from among the members of the President's own political party. The Cabinet includes the heads of the 15 executive departments, such as the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, and Secretary of Defense, who are responsible for leading and managing their respective departments.

The Cabinet also includes Cabinet-level officials, who are appointed by the President to advise on specific policy areas or issues. These officials may not head their departments but have significant expertise or experience that the President values. It is important to note that not all high-level presidential appointees are considered part of the Cabinet. Some positions, such as the White House Chief of Staff and the National Security Advisor, are crucial to the President's administration but do not carry Cabinet rank.

In conclusion, the US Constitution clearly prohibits members of the President's Cabinet from simultaneously holding a seat in Congress. This separation of roles ensures a clear division of powers and responsibilities between the executive and legislative branches of the US government. The Cabinet's role is to advise the President and shape policy, while Congress's role is to legislate and represent the people. This constitutional design maintains a system of checks and balances and prevents the concentration of power in a single branch or individual.

Do revenue bills originate in the House of Representatives?

The constitutional question, "Do revenue bills originate in the House of Representatives?" is addressed by the Origination Clause, also known as the Revenue Clause. This clause, which is Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, states that all bills for raising revenue must originate in the House of Representatives. This means that any legislation that imposes taxes must begin in the House. The Origination Clause is based on British parliamentary practice, which requires that all money bills have their first reading in the House of Commons.

The purpose of the Origination Clause is to ensure that the power of the purse is held by the legislative body most responsive to the people. The clause was part of the Great Compromise between small and large states during the drafting of the Constitution. Large states were unhappy with the disproportionate power of small states in the Senate, so the Origination Clause was intended to offset this by giving the House of Representatives, which is based on state population, the initial authority over tax decisions.

While the Origination Clause requires that revenue bills originate in the House, it does not prevent the Senate from proposing or concurring with amendments to these bills, as is the case with other types of legislation. However, there have been legal challenges to the Senate's ability to amend revenue bills substantially. In some cases, the Senate has been accused of using the amendment process to give a bill its revenue-raising character, thereby circumventing the Origination Clause.

The legal question surrounding these challenges is whether a particular bill that became law was indeed a "Bill for raising Revenue." This distinction is important because the House-origination requirement applies only to bills that levy taxes in the strict sense. If a bill with a revenue-raising provision originates in the House, the Senate can remove that provision and substitute another, as long as the amended bill still addresses revenue. However, the Supreme Court has never approved the "strike-and-replace" procedure, and both the Senate and the judiciary have sometimes guarded the House's role in originating revenue bills.

Frequently asked questions