Presidential Powers: Exploring Constitutional Roots And Limits

The US Constitution, specifically Article II, establishes the Executive Branch of the federal government, outlining the powers and duties of the President of the United States. This article grants the President executive power, making them Commander-in-Chief of the US military and giving them the authority to approve or veto legislation, grant pardons, make treaties, and appoint ambassadors and other officials. The President also has distinct authority over foreign affairs, including the power to recognise foreign governments and manage relations with other nations. While the Constitution envisages a strong Presidency, it also emphasises accountability, with checks and balances in place to prevent the office from becoming imperial.

Explore related products

Contested Ground: How to Understand the Limits of Presidential Power

$26.49 $26.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Guantanamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power (The US Constitution and Military Law)

$15.99 $21.99

Constitutional Ambiguity and the Interpretation of Presidential Power (American Jewish Society (Dis))

$35.95 $35.95

Presidential War Power

$28.63 $37.99

Executive Privilege: Presidential Power, Secrecy, and Accountability (Studies in Government and Public Policy)

$28.49 $29.99

Commander-in-Chief of the US military

The US Constitution, in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, states that the President "shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States". This clause, known as the Commander-in-Chief Clause, grants the President substantial authority over the US military.

The Commander-in-Chief Clause gives the President the exclusive power to command the military in operations approved by Congress. It also grants the President significant independent power to direct military operations, provided they do not infringe on the exclusive powers of Congress or other provisions of the Constitution. This includes the power to deploy American forces abroad and commit them to military operations when deemed necessary for national security. The President holds prime responsibility for the conduct of US foreign relations, and it is their duty to decide when an armed attack has occurred.

The Commander-in-Chief Clause has been interpreted to convey independent substantive power to the President to direct the military on matters not related to war initiation. For example, Presidents have claimed authority to attack pirates, rescue US citizens abroad, and make military deployments. However, this authority is limited by other provisions of the Constitution and, arguably, international law. The Court rejected the argument that the Clause allowed the President to seize US steel mills to support the Korean War or use military commissions to try civilians with functioning civilian courts.

The President's role as Commander-in-Chief is a civilian position, and they are not subject to military discipline. The Framers of the Constitution intended to place the command of the armed forces under civilian authority, ensuring the subordination of the military to democratically accountable civilian leadership. The President's duties as Commander-in-Chief are part of their broader duties as Chief Executive.

Power to grant reprieves and pardons

The US Constitution grants the President the power to "grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment". This power is derived from Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution.

A pardon is an expression of the president's forgiveness and is usually granted when the applicant accepts responsibility for their crime and demonstrates good conduct post-conviction or post-sentence. While a pardon does not signify innocence, it does restore certain civil rights, such as firearm rights and occupational licensing, that may have been revoked due to a past criminal conviction. In rare cases, a pardon can also halt criminal proceedings and prevent an indictment, as seen in the case of Richard Nixon.

Reprieves and pardons were first proposed by the Committee of Detail, with the exception that a pardon could not be used to avoid impeachment—a restriction that also applied to royal pardons in England. The pardon power was first used by George Washington in 1795 when he pardoned participants in the Whiskey Rebellion. Thomas Jefferson also granted amnesty to citizens convicted under the Alien and Sedition Acts.

The US Supreme Court has interpreted the pardon power to include not only full pardons but also conditional pardons, commutations of sentences, conditional commutations, remissions of fines and forfeitures, respites, and amnesties. A commutation reduces the severity of a sentence without cancelling the conviction. The Court has also ruled that a pardon is not a private act of grace but a determination by the ultimate authority that a lesser punishment will better serve the public welfare.

Despite the broad authority granted to the President under the Pardon Clause, there are two key limitations. Firstly, pardons and reprieves can only be granted for offences against the United States, excluding state criminal offences and federal or state civil claims. Secondly, the President cannot use their clemency power in cases of impeachment.

Authority to approve or veto legislation

The US Constitution grants the President the authority to approve or veto legislation. This authority is derived from Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, also known as the Presentment Clause, which states that every bill that has passed both houses of Congress must be presented to the President for approval or veto. The President has ten days, excluding Sundays, to approve or veto a bill. If the President approves a bill, they are required to sign it, and it becomes law.

The Presentment Clause also allows the President to veto legislation, which means they can prevent it from taking effect unless two-thirds of both the House and the Senate vote to override the veto. If the President does not approve of a bill, they must return it, along with their objections, to the house in which it originated within ten days. Congress is then required to consider the President's objections and reconsider the legislation. If, after such reconsideration, two-thirds of both houses still agree to pass the bill, it becomes law.

The Supreme Court has held that the President is not required to write the word "approved" or the date of approval on a bill they wish to approve. Additionally, the Court has clarified that the Constitution's veto provisions serve two functions: to give the President an opportunity to consider bills presented to them and to allow Congress to consider the President's objections and pass the bill over their veto if there are sufficient votes.

While the President has the authority to approve or veto legislation, the Supreme Court has stated that the Constitution refutes the idea that the President is intended to be a lawmaker. Instead, the President has the power to faithfully execute the laws, and officials appointed by the President may exercise quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial powers.

Explore related products

To Rescue the American Spirit: Teddy Roosevelt and the Birth of a Superpower (The Presidential Series)

$23.09 $32.99

Lincoln's Constitution

$14.08 $17

Emergency Presidential Power: From the Drafting of the Constitution to the War on Terror

$26.35 $26.95

The Enigma of Presidential Power: Parties, Policies and Strategic Uses of Unilateral Action

$29.99 $32

Presidential Power in America: The Constitution, the Defense of a Nation and the National Ethos.

$8.95

Presidential Command: Power, Leadership, and the Making of Foreign Policy from Richard Nixon to George W. Bush

$17.95 $22

Ability to make treaties with advice from the Senate

The US Constitution grants the President the power to make treaties with the advice and consent of the Senate. This is outlined in Article II, Section 2, which states that the President "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur". This clause, known as the Treaty Clause, gives the President the authority to negotiate and enter into treaties with other nations, with the approval of the Senate.

The Treaty Clause is an important aspect of the President's foreign affairs powers. It allows the President to make binding agreements with other countries, which become part of international law and federal legislation. Treaties can cover a range of issues, including peace agreements, trade relations, and alliances. The President is responsible for negotiating and signing treaties, but the Senate must approve them before they take effect. This process ensures that treaties have broad political support and protects the sovereignty of the states by giving each state an equal vote in the treaty-making process.

The role of the Senate in the treaty-making process is primarily to advise and consent. The Senate does not negotiate treaties, but it can approve or reject them. The Senate can also place conditions or reservations on its approval, which may require reopening negotiations. While the President has the authority to initiate and conclude treaties, the Senate's approval is necessary for a treaty to become binding.

In recent years, some presidents have entered into ""executive agreements"" with other nations without seeking the advice and consent of the Senate. While these agreements are binding under international law, they do not go through the same approval process as formal treaties. This practice has become more common due to the increasing complexity of international relations and the difficulty of obtaining Senate approval.

The President's treaty-making power, with the advice and consent of the Senate, is a key aspect of US foreign policy. It allows the nation to enter into binding agreements with other countries, shaping international relations and federal legislation. The process of making treaties involves negotiation, approval, and implementation, with the President and the Senate playing crucial roles in ensuring the nation's interests are served.

Power to nominate ambassadors and other officials

The US Constitution grants the President the power to nominate and, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint ambassadors, ministers, and consuls. This is outlined in the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, which states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States".

The Appointments Clause ensures a separation of powers between the President and the Senate, with the President having the sole power to nominate and the Senate having the power to reject or confirm a nominee through its advice and consent provision. The President is not bound to appoint their own nominee, even with the Senate's advice, and the Senate's role is advisory to the nomination. This ensures accountability and pre-empts tyranny.

The President also has the power to receive ambassadors and other public ministers, as outlined in Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution. This power was given to the President to ensure that the President was the sole conduit to communicate with foreign nations and their representatives. The Framers of the Constitution believed that permitting states to exchange ambassadors with foreign states would undermine the foreign relations of the United States as a whole.

While the President has the power to nominate and appoint ambassadors, the creation and operation of foreign diplomatic posts are influenced by Congress. Congress has, at times, asserted authority over the creation of diplomatic offices and can appropriate specific sums of money for salaries and impose requirements for the selection of foreign officers via statute. However, the President has often appointed ambassadors to foreign countries and has the final say in appointing individuals to these diplomatic posts.

Frequently asked questions