The Constitution's Free Speech Clause: Censorship's Antidote

Censorship in the United States raises issues of freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The First Amendment, passed by Congress on September 25, 1789, and ratified on December 15, 1791, protects what are commonly known as The Five Freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. While the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, it does not grant Americans blanket immunity to say whatever they want without consequences. For instance, people convicted of distributing obscene pornography face long prison terms and asset forfeiture. Furthermore, while direct censorship of the internet is prohibited by the First Amendment, private companies like social media platforms are legally able to establish regulations and guidelines within their communities, including content censorship.

Explore related products

Murder the Truth: Fear, the First Amendment, and a Secret Campaign to Protect the Powerful

$18.82 $32.99

Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment

$10.99 $17.99

A Short & Happy Guide to the First Amendment (Short & Happy Guides)

$28 $28

The First Amendment: Essays on the Imperative of Intellectual Freedom

$23

Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment

$14.59 $20

First Amendment (Examples & Explanations)

$50.09 $76.95

The First Amendment

> "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment also protects "indecent" pornography from regulation, but not "obscene" pornography. In addition, the First Amendment does not protect speech that presents a clear and present danger of a substantive evil, such as attempting to overthrow the government, inciting riots, or destruction of life and property.

While the First Amendment prohibits direct censorship of the internet, it does not prevent private companies from engaging in self-censorship or establishing their own regulations and guidelines for content on their platforms. Social media platforms, for example, are private companies that can legally censor content or ban members.

Freedom of speech

The First Amendment's protection of free speech is not absolute, however. While it shields individuals from government censorship, it does not grant Americans the right to say whatever they want, wherever they want, without consequences. The Supreme Court has established guidelines, or tests, to define what constitutes protected and unprotected speech. For example, the "clear and present danger" test from Schenck v. United States (1919) and the "strict scrutiny" or "compelling state interest" test from Korematsu v. United States (1944). These tests help determine when speech crosses the line into areas like inciting violence or causing imminent lawless action, which are not protected by the First Amendment.

The interpretation of free speech has evolved over time, particularly with the advent of new technologies like the internet and social media. While the First Amendment prohibits direct censorship of the internet, certain types of content, such as obscenity and child pornography, are not protected. Social media platforms, as private companies, have the legal right to regulate content and enforce their community guidelines, including censorship and banning users.

The United States has a history of censorship, particularly during times of war and heightened political tensions. For example, during World War I, Congress passed the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, which restricted speech critical of the government. More recently, the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and the Child Online Protection Act of 1998 were passed to regulate online content, but they were later found to be unconstitutional.

Freedom of the press

The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press". This amendment was passed by Congress on September 25, 1789, and ratified on December 15, 1791, as part of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights outlines the fundamental freedoms and rights of American citizens, and any law that infringes upon these rights is considered unconstitutional.

The freedom of the press protects the ability of journalists and news organizations to gather, report, and publish news and information without governmental interference. This includes the right to criticize public officials and policies, as well as the right to access and disseminate information. This freedom is essential for a well-informed public and a functioning democracy.

However, it is important to note that freedom of the press is not absolute. While the government cannot censor the press, there are legal restrictions on what can be published, particularly regarding obscenity, defamation, and national security. For example, child pornography and certain types of obscene content are not protected by the First Amendment. Additionally, the Supreme Court has established guidelines, or tests, to define what constitutes protected and unprotected speech, such as the "clear and present danger" test from Schenck v. United States (1919).

Furthermore, while the First Amendment prohibits government censorship of the press, private companies, including social media platforms, have the legal right to regulate content on their platforms. This has led to debates about the role of these companies in shaping public discourse and the boundaries of free speech online.

Explore related products

Understanding the First Amendment (Understanding Series)

$51.73 $55

The First Amendment (Concepts and Insights)

$45 $60

The Case Against Free Speech: The First Amendment, Fascism, and the Future of Dissent

$28 $22.49

First Amendment For Beginners

$11.78 $15.95

First Amendment: [Connected eBook] (Aspen Casebook Series)

$240.9 $308

The First Amendment (Aspen Casebook)

$85.99 $206

Freedom of religion

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, passed by Congress on September 25, 1789, and ratified on December 15, 1791, includes explicit provisions regarding freedom of religion. This amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof".

The First Amendment's freedom of religion language can be broken down into two key parts: the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause. The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion without government interference. This means that individuals are free to exercise their religious beliefs as they see fit, as long as their practices do not conflict with "public morals" or a "compelling" government interest. For example, in the case of Prince v. Massachusetts (1944), the Supreme Court ruled that a state could mandate the inoculation of children, even if their parents objected on religious grounds, as the state had a compelling interest in protecting public health and safety.

The Establishment Clause, on the other hand, prohibits the government from establishing a national religion or favouring one religion over another. This clause ensures the "separation of church and state," a concept referred to by Thomas Jefferson and others, although this exact phrase is not part of the amendment. Under the "Lemon" test, established by the Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the government can only assist religion if three conditions are met: the primary purpose of the assistance is secular, it does not promote or inhibit religion, and there is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

The inclusion of freedom of religion in the First Amendment was of particular importance to many American colonists, especially those from religious groups such as the Quakers, Episcopalians, and Presbyterians, who had emigrated from England to escape religious persecution. The First Amendment thus guarantees that individuals in the United States have the right to practice their religion freely and without interference from the government, while also ensuring that the government remains neutral in matters of religion.

Freedom of assembly

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech and expression against all levels of government censorship. This includes the freedom of assembly, which is one of the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment. The freedom of assembly is the right of the people to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This means that people have the right to gather peacefully and to make requests or express grievances to the government.

The First Amendment was adopted in 1791 and ratified on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments of the Bill of Rights. It states that "Congress shall make no law [...] abridging [...] the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This amendment gives everyone residing in the United States the right to hear all sides of every issue and to make their own judgments.

The freedom of assembly has been an important right throughout American history, allowing people to gather and express their views on a variety of issues. For example, during the Civil Rights Movement, peaceful assemblies and protests played a crucial role in bringing attention to the issue of racial segregation and inequality.

However, the freedom of assembly, like other freedoms protected by the First Amendment, is not absolute. The government has the power to restrict or prohibit assemblies that pose a clear and present danger or that interfere with the rights of others. For example, the government may prohibit assemblies that are likely to turn violent or that block public access to important facilities.

In addition, while the First Amendment prohibits government censorship of assembly, it does not prevent private companies or organizations from establishing their own regulations and guidelines regarding assemblies on their property. For example, a private company may prohibit protests or demonstrations on its premises.

Frequently asked questions