
The topic of abortion and its constitutional protection is a highly debated issue in the United States. While the word abortion is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, several Amendments, including the Fifth and Fourteenth, have been interpreted to protect a woman's right to choose. The Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection and due process, was cited in the landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade (1973) to recognize abortion as a liberty right, concluding that states cannot categorically ban abortions. However, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in the 2022 Dobbs decision, leading to varying abortion laws across states. Despite the absence of explicit mention, some argue that abortion is a right retained by the people, and state courts have played a role in shaping abortion rights and access.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Right to privacy | The right to privacy is a fundamental right that encompasses a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. |
| Fourteenth Amendment | The Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause and liberty right protect abortion as a fundamental right. |
| Roe v. Wade | The Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade legalized abortion nationwide and was reinforced by Casey v. Planned Parenthood. |
| State autonomy | Some state courts have focused on autonomy, the right to control one's body without coercion, as a protection for abortion rights. |
| Fifth Amendment | Abortion bans may violate the Fifth Amendment by not compensating women for the use of their bodies to serve the state's interests. |
| Eighth Amendment | The Eighth Amendment protects against cruel and unusual punishment, which could be argued to include a forced gestational period. |
| Unenumerated rights | The Constitution protects certain rights, and the absence of a right does not deny other retained rights, such as the right to travel, vote, and marry. |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Roe v. Wade
The case originated as a lawsuit filed by Coffee and Weddington in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of their client, Jane Roe, against Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, who represented the State of Texas. The lawsuit challenged a Texas law that prohibited abortions except when necessary to save the mother's life. The three-judge panel hearing the case unanimously ruled in favour of Roe, declaring the Texas law unconstitutional as it violated the right to privacy.
However, the Court declined to grant an injunction against enforcing the law, which meant that Jane Roe could not get an abortion despite the ruling in her favour. Both sides appealed the decision, and the case eventually reached the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade had far-reaching implications for abortion rights in the United States. The Court recognised that the right to liberty in the Constitution, specifically the Fourteenth Amendment, protects personal privacy and includes the right to decide whether to continue or end a pregnancy.
The Court concluded that states could not categorically prohibit abortions by making their performance a crime and that the right to privacy encompasses a woman's decision to carry a pregnancy to term. This decision was based on the understanding that the right to privacy is a fundamental right and that only a compelling state interest could justify interference in such a decision. The Roe ruling established a framework for abortion rights, holding that before fetal viability, the state could not unduly interfere with a woman's decision to have an abortion, while after viability, the state could restrict abortions as long as there were exceptions for pregnancies endangering the mother's life or health.
The Roe v. Wade decision had a significant impact on abortion laws across the United States, making abortion legal, more accessible, and safer for many pregnant people. It was consistent with earlier Supreme Court rulings recognising a right to privacy in matters of child-rearing, marriage, procreation, and contraception. However, it is important to note that the Roe ruling was not without its limitations, and even after the decision, low-income individuals, people of colour, and young people still faced barriers in accessing abortion services.
Thomas Paine's Influence on the US Constitution
You may want to see also

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
In 2022, the United States Supreme Court made a landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, holding that the US Constitution does not protect the right to abortion. The case concerned the Gestational Age Act, a Mississippi state law banning most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Supreme Court's decision upheld this law and overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), concluding that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion and returning the issue of abortion regulation to federal and state legislatures.
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of Mississippi's Gestational Age Act, which banned abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy with exceptions for medical emergencies and fetal abnormalities. The law was challenged by Jackson Women's Health Organization, Mississippi's only abortion clinic at the time, and one of its doctors, Sacheen Carr-Ellis, who sued state officials, including Thomas E. Dobbs, the state health officer. Lower courts had initially ruled in favour of the clinic, placing an injunction on Mississippi from enforcing the law, citing evidence that fetal viability begins between 23 and 24 weeks.
The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization had far-reaching implications. By overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Court removed the constitutional protection for abortion that had been in place for nearly five decades. This decision shifted the power to regulate abortion from the courts to federal and state legislatures, allowing states to determine their own abortion laws. The ruling sparked widespread debate and criticism, with some celebrating the decision and others expressing concern over the loss of reproductive rights and the potential impact on women's health and freedom.
The Dobbs case specifically addressed the question of whether a state law must allow abortions to protect a woman's life and health, and if so, at what point. The Court's decision upheld Mississippi's law, which allowed for exceptions in cases of medical emergencies and fetal abnormalities, but did not provide a clear answer to the broader question of when a state must allow abortions to protect a woman's health. This question remains a subject of ongoing debate and legal interpretation, with potential implications for the application of abortion regulations to various forms of medical care.
The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision had a significant impact on abortion access and reproductive rights in the United States, with public health activists exploring ways to make medical abortion more available in states with restrictive laws. The ruling also drew criticism from international figures, including the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, and Chinese government officials, who expressed concerns about the setback for sexual and reproductive health and rights.
Fairness Doctrine: Constitutional or Unconstitutional?
You may want to see also

Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution has been interpreted to protect a woman's right to choose to have an abortion. This interpretation is based on the Amendment's guarantee of equal protection and due process rights.
In the landmark 1973 case of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment protects a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. The Court ruled that states may not categorically proscribe abortions by making their performance a crime. The Court's decision rested on the conclusion that the right to privacy includes a woman's decision to carry a pregnancy to term. The Court stated that this right is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy and that only a compelling state interest could justify infringing upon it.
The Roe v. Wade decision was based on the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process, which protects against deprivations of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Supreme Court interpreted this to include a woman's liberty right to choose to have an abortion. This liberty right was further reinforced by the Court in Casey v. Planned Parenthood.
However, the Court's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment in Roe v. Wade has been controversial. In the 2022 case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, ruling that there is no constitutional right to abortion. Justice Alito, in the majority opinion, wrote that the Constitution, including the Fourteenth Amendment, makes no reference to abortion and that abortion is critically different from other rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, such as intimate sexual relations, contraception, and marriage.
Despite the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, some state courts have continued to interpret their state constitutions to protect abortion rights. These state courts have focused on the right to autonomy, or the right to control one's own body without influence or coercion, to protect abortion as a personal right. Additionally, some state courts have relied on rights to privacy in their state constitutions to recognize strong protections for abortion.
The Constitution: Political or Legal System?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

State laws
Prior to the Roe v. Wade decision, abortion laws varied across states. Connecticut was the first state to regulate abortion in 1821, outlawing it after "quickening" – the moment a pregnant woman feels the fetus's movement. Other states followed suit, influenced by physicians and the American Medical Association, who advocated for anti-abortion laws. By the latter half of the 19th century, abortion was criminalized in many states.
However, in the wake of Roe v. Wade, states were no longer permitted to impose blanket prohibitions on abortions. The ruling recognized a woman's right to choose to terminate her pregnancy before viability without undue interference from the state. Subsequently, in Stenberg v. Carhart, the Court struck down a Nebraska statute prohibiting partial-birth abortions for lacking exceptions to protect the mother's health and for its vague language.
The dynamic nature of abortion laws became evident following the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in 2022. This ruling overturned Roe v. Wade, effectively eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion. Consequently, state legislatures have been swift to introduce new abortion restrictions and enforce existing ones, with 41 states currently imposing abortion bans with limited exceptions.
While the majority of states now have abortion bans in place, there is variation in the specifics of these laws. Some states, like Maine, allow abortion after viability when deemed necessary by a physician. Iowa's law includes exceptions for rape and incest, but survivors must report the incident within a specified timeframe. Massachusetts has defined abortion as legal when a pregnancy has existed for less than 24 weeks, aligning with the concept of "viability." These exceptions, however, have been criticized for their limited practicality and the challenges they pose to those seeking abortions.
Separation of Powers: Constitution's Basic Structure?
You may want to see also

Women's rights
The topic of abortion and its legality has been a highly debated topic in the United States for decades. The landmark case of Roe v. Wade in 1973 saw the U.S. Supreme Court recognize abortion as a liberty right under the Fourteenth Amendment, stating that the Constitution protects a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. This decision was based on the conclusion that the right to privacy includes a woman's decision to carry a pregnancy to term.
However, in 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case, ruling that there is no constitutional right to abortion. This decision has led to a stark divide in abortion laws across different states, with Republican-controlled legislatures in 24 states passing or working on total or near-total abortion bans. This has resulted in women's rights and liberties varying significantly depending on their state of residence.
Despite the absence of the word "abortion" in the Constitution, several Amendments have been interpreted to protect a woman's right to choose. The Fifth Amendment, which guarantees the right to be secure in one's person and property, has been cited as prohibiting abortion bans without just compensation for the use of a woman's body to serve the state's interest in birthing humans. The Eighth Amendment, intended to protect against cruel and unusual punishment, has also been invoked, arguing that forcing a gestational period on women can be considered cruel and unusual.
Additionally, the equal protection language of the Fourteenth Amendment applies, as abortion bans disproportionately impact women, even though men share responsibility for unwanted pregnancies. State courts have also played a significant role in shaping abortion rights, with some recognizing strong personal privacy and autonomy rights, equality principles, and the historical nature of abortion protections.
The debate surrounding abortion continues to be a highly contentious issue, with advocates for women's rights arguing for the protection of abortion access as a fundamental liberty and autonomy right, while others, including religious groups, oppose it on moral and spiritual grounds.
The Building Blocks of Scientific Nomenclature
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The US Constitution does not explicitly mention abortion. However, in Roe v. Wade (1973), the US Supreme Court recognized abortion as a liberty right under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court ruled that states could not categorically outlaw abortions by making their performance a crime, as this would violate a woman's right to privacy.
Roe v. Wade was a legal case brought to the Supreme Court by Norma McCorvey (under the legal pseudonym "Jane Roe") against the state. She was unexpectedly pregnant with her third child in 1969 and wanted an abortion, but lived in a state with an abortion ban. She claimed that abortion bans were unconstitutional and that she was denied a basic human right. The Court sided with her, declaring abortion a nationally protected right.
The Roe v. Wade decision was overturned in 2022 by the Supreme Court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. This marked the first time the US Supreme Court had taken away a fundamental right. The ruling has led to a variety of different laws across states regarding abortion.
The Dobbs decision has resulted in a landscape of varying abortion rights across states, with 167.5 million women experiencing different rights depending on their state of residence. This has led to a reversal of the previous three-decade decline in abortions, with more abortions occurring in states that allow the procedure.
Abortion is argued to be a constitutional right based on the right to privacy, liberty, autonomy, and equality. The Fifth Amendment's equal protection clause is also cited, as abortion bans are seen as discriminatory towards women. Additionally, abortions were legally performed and not uncommon when the Constitution was written.

























