The First Amendment: Separation Of Church And State

The separation of church and state is a legal doctrine in the United States primarily derived from the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or unduly favoring one religion over another, thereby promoting religious pluralism and allowing all Americans to practice their beliefs in private and public. The concept of separation is also found in the Fourteenth Amendment, which introduced the incorporation of federal rights against the states, including the application of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause to state laws and local ordinances. The Supreme Court has played a significant role in interpreting and enforcing the separation of church and state, such as in the landmark case of Everson v. Board of Education (1947) and Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), where the Court upheld the separation doctrine and prohibited religious activities in public schools.

Explore related products

Murder the Truth: Fear, the First Amendment, and a Secret Campaign to Protect the Powerful

$18.82 $32.99

Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment

$10.99 $17.99

A Short & Happy Guide to the First Amendment (Short & Happy Guides)

$28 $28

The First Amendment: Essays on the Imperative of Intellectual Freedom

$23

Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment

$14.29 $20

First Amendment (Examples & Explanations)

$48.26 $76.95

The First Amendment

> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

The first part of this amendment is known as the "establishment clause", and the second part is known as the "free exercise clause". These two clauses form the textual basis for the Supreme Court's interpretation of the separation of church and state. The establishment clause prohibits the government from creating an official religion or favouring one religion (or non-religion) over another. The free exercise clause ensures the right to practice one's faith without harming others.

The concept of separating church and state is not explicitly stated in the First Amendment, but it is often interpreted to mean that the Constitution requires this separation. The metaphor of a "wall of separation" between church and state was popularised by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island, is thought to have first used the metaphor in 1636, when he referred to a high wall between church and state.

The Supreme Court has interpreted the First Amendment's religious clauses as requiring the separation of church and state in several landmark cases. In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), the Court held that the establishment clause is one of the liberties protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, making it applicable to state laws and local ordinances. In Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), the Court ruled that the First Amendment's establishment clause prohibited bible reading and the recitation of prayers in public schools.

Religious liberty

The concept of "separation of church and state" is derived from the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This amendment guarantees religious liberty by forbidding the government from creating or establishing a religion, thereby preventing the expansion of government power beyond civil matters. The First Amendment also protects individuals' right to worship freely or not worship at all, ensuring that the government does not interfere in matters of religion.

The First Amendment's "establishment clause" and "free exercise clause" form the basis for the Supreme Court's interpretation of the separation of church and state. The establishment clause, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, prevents the government from establishing an official religion or favouring one religion over another. This interpretation ensures that all Americans can practice their beliefs without interference from the state.

The concept of separating church and state is often credited to the writings of English philosopher John Locke, who expanded on the ideas of Roger Williams, a minister, lawyer, and merchant. Williams first coined the term "soul liberty" in 1636, advocating for freedom of conscience and worship. He envisioned a “high wall” separating church and state to prevent government corruption from infringing on religious freedom. Williams influenced Thomas Jefferson, who famously used the "wall of separation" metaphor in his letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, emphasising the protection of religious minorities.

The separation of church and state is essential for maintaining religious liberty. Without this separation, true religious freedom is compromised. Allowing preferential access or power to certain religious groups can create a polarising environment, prioritising the rights and beliefs of the majority over those of minorities. By upholding the separation, individuals are free to embrace or reject faith, and support for religion must be voluntary. This ensures that all religions are equal in the eyes of the law, promoting religious pluralism and tolerance.

In conclusion, the First Amendment's guarantee of religious liberty is underpinned by the separation of church and state. This separation, derived from the establishment and free exercise clauses, ensures that the government cannot establish a religion or interfere with individuals' religious practices. The concept, influenced by Roger Williams and John Locke, safeguards the freedom of conscience and worship, fostering an environment where all religions are treated equally under the law.

The Establishment Clause

> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

The precise definition of "establishment" is unclear. Historically, it meant prohibiting state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. Today, what constitutes an "establishment of religion" is often governed by the three-part "Lemon" test set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971). Under the Lemon test, the government can assist religion only if:

• The primary purpose of the assistance is secular;
• The assistance must neither promote nor inhibit religion; and
• There is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

Explore related products

Understanding the First Amendment (Understanding Series)

$51.73 $55

The First Amendment (Concepts and Insights)

$45 $60

The Case Against Free Speech: The First Amendment, Fascism, and the Future of Dissent

$28 $22.49

First Amendment For Beginners

$11.78 $15.95

The First Amendment (Aspen Casebook)

$85.99 $206

First Amendment: [Connected eBook] (Aspen Casebook Series)

$240.9 $308

The Free Exercise Clause

The concept of "separation of church and state" is derived from the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which includes the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Free Exercise Clause, also known as freedom of religion, is outlined in the first section of the First Amendment:

> "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

At times, the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause have come into conflict, requiring federal courts and the Supreme Court to resolve these disputes. Some Free Exercise Clause cases have considered whether a government policy had a coercive effect on religious exercise. For example, in Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025), the Supreme Court held that a school's use of storybooks conflicting with parents' religious beliefs burdened their religious exercise by interfering with their children's religious development.

Supreme Court interpretations

The concept of "separation of church and state" is derived from the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which reads:

> "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

The two parts of this amendment are known as the "establishment clause" and the "free exercise clause", respectively. They form the basis for the Supreme Court's interpretations of the separation of church and state. Three central concepts were derived from the First Amendment, which became the doctrine for church-state separation in the US:

• No coercion in religious matters
• No expectation to support a religion against one's will
• Religious liberty encompasses all religions

The Supreme Court has interpreted the First Amendment to mean that citizens are free to embrace or reject a faith, and that support for religion, whether financial or physical, must be voluntary. All religions are considered equal in the eyes of the law, with no special preference or favouritism.

The Supreme Court first interpreted the meaning of the establishment clause in 1947, in the case of Everson v. Board of Education. The case dealt with a New Jersey law that allowed government funds to pay for the transportation of students to both public and Catholic schools. The Court held that the establishment clause is one of the liberties protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, making it applicable to state laws and local ordinances. The Court cited Jefferson's metaphor of a "wall of separation" between church and state, concluding that:

> "The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach."

Since the Everson case, the Supreme Court has continued to interpret the precise nature of the separation of church and state. In 1963, the Court ruled in Abington School District v. Schempp that the reading of the Bible and the recitation of the Lord's Prayer in public schools violated the First Amendment's establishment clause. In 1968, in Epperson v. Arkansas, the Court considered an Arkansas law that made it a crime to teach the theory of evolution in schools. The Court ruled that the law violated the First Amendment's prohibition on laws respecting an establishment of religion.

In recent years, some critics have argued that the Supreme Court has adopted an approach that blurs the lines between church and state. The Court has permitted official Christian prayers at government meetings and allowed the display of large religious symbols, such as a 40-foot Latin cross. The Court has also sided with those who discriminate against others in the name of religion. Despite these concerns, the Supreme Court's interpretations of the separation of church and state continue to shape the relationship between religion and government in the United States.

Frequently asked questions