Probate Law: Understanding Will Contest Probable Cause

Contesting a will involves challenging the legitimacy or authority of the will and its provisions. To contest a will, one must demonstrate a direct financial interest in the outcome of the estate distribution. A will may be contested on several legal grounds, including improper document execution, substantive claims of fraud, forgery, elder abuse, or if the testator lacked testamentary capacity, was operating under an insane delusion, or was subject to undue influence. Many states implement a probable cause theory, which means that if a person can demonstrate they have a legitimate, probable cause for contesting the will, they may be allowed to proceed with the contest and still receive their intended inheritance.

Explore related products

Laughing to the Bank

$3.99

The Will (TV Series)

$2.99

Willard

$2.99

Probable Cause: When One Man's Passion For Justice Becomes An Obsession For Revenge

$7.99 $9.99

You Know Something is Wrong When.....: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause

$25

Probable Cause

$19.99 $23.95

The will does not reflect the testator's intentions

A will contest is a formal objection to a will's validity, based on the assertion that it does not reflect the testator's intentions. The onus is on the person contesting the will to prove that the testator's intentions were not accurately reflected in the will. This can be a challenging process, as courts generally presume that a will is valid and accurately reflects the wishes of the testator.

To have standing to contest a will on these grounds, the person challenging it must be either named in the will or have a direct pecuniary interest in the estate. This means that they would need to demonstrate that they would be personally affected by the outcome of the case. It is important to note that not just anyone can contest a will—being unhappy with what one has inherited is not sufficient grounds for a challenge.

When contesting a will on the basis that it does not reflect the testator's intentions, there are several factors to consider. One key factor is the testator's mental capacity at the time of signing. The testator must have had the capacity to understand the nature of the act, the natural objects of their bounty, the nature, extent, and value of their property, and the disposition of their assets. Eyewitnesses to the will's execution are often relied upon to prove incapacity, although medical records and witness testimonies may also be used as evidence.

Another factor to consider is undue influence, which occurs when the testator's desires are subverted for those of another. To prove undue influence, the contester must show that another person exerted their will on a vulnerable testator, resulting in a provision that reflects the influencer's intentions rather than those of the testator. This is often proven through circumstantial evidence, and many states presume undue influence when a confidential relationship existed between the testator and the beneficiary.

In addition to the above, other valid reasons to contest a will on the grounds that it does not reflect the testator's intentions include fraud, coercion, or improper execution. Fraud can take the form of false representations of material facts to the testator or misleading the testator about the nature of the document they are signing. Improper execution may include a failure to adhere to legal formalities, such as specific terminology, notarization, or witness requirements.

The testator lacked testamentary capacity

A will contest is a formal objection raised against the validity of a will, based on the assertion that the will does not reflect the actual intent of the testator (the person who made the will) or that the testator lacked testamentary capacity. Testamentary capacity is a legal concept that refers to the mental ability or competence of a person to make a will. It requires that a testator is of sound mind and has a certain level of understanding and mental capacity at the time of signing the will.

The test for testamentary capacity typically involves evaluating whether the testator had a basic understanding of their life and control over their faculties, including their ability to understand the nature and extent of their property, identify their heirs, and comprehend the impact of their will on their heirs' right to inherit. This may include considering if the testator suffered from any cognitive impairments, mental disorders, or delusions that influenced their decision-making.

To contest a will on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity, the challenging party must provide evidence to overcome the presumption of testamentary capacity based on the signatures of witnesses to the will. This evidence can include medical records, testimony from doctors, mental health professionals, and psychologists, as well as the testator's behaviour and actions leading up to and at the time of signing the will. For example, evidence of cognitive impairments, such as dementia or learning disabilities, may be considered, although these do not automatically prove a lack of testamentary capacity.

It is important to note that the requirements for testamentary capacity may vary depending on the circumstances and assets of the testator. If the testator's circumstances and assets are simple and straightforward, the level of capacity required may be lower compared to a testator with complex circumstances and assets. Additionally, the specific requirements for testamentary capacity may differ across states or jurisdictions, so it is essential to refer to the relevant state laws when contesting a will on these grounds.

The testator was subject to undue influence

Undue influence is a challenging concept to define and legislate. It generally refers to the overpowering of a person's free will through duress, coercion, or fraud, and it often occurs behind closed doors. In the context of a will, undue influence means that an individual coerced the testator (the person who made the will) into including provisions that benefited that individual and did not reflect the testator's true desires.

To prove undue influence, an individual contesting the will (the "contestant") must rely on circumstantial evidence, as direct evidence is often unavailable. The contestant may introduce evidence of the testator's vulnerability, such as age, emotional distress, or a weakened mental state. They may also present proof of the influencer's power or authority over the testator, such as control over their housing, healthcare, or finances. A showing of motive or opportunity may support a claim of undue influence but is typically insufficient on its own.

Additionally, the contestant may need to prove that a confidential or fiduciary relationship existed between the influencer and the testator. This could include relationships such as attorney-client or guardian-ward. The contestant must demonstrate that the influencer took advantage of the testator's trust or lack of knowledge to draft a will that benefited the influencer disproportionately.

To disprove undue influence, evidence may be presented to show that the testator was independent and capable of managing their own affairs and finances, indicating a level of mental acuity and independent thinking that negates the claim of undue influence. A doctor's testimony may also be helpful in establishing that the testator's mental capacity made them unlikely to be susceptible to undue influence.

In summary, proving undue influence in a will contest can be challenging, and each state may have its own specific laws and caselaw defining it. Contestants must provide strong circumstantial evidence that the testator was coerced or manipulated into making decisions that contradicted their true intentions and benefited the influencer.

Explore related products

Probable Cause

$3.99 $30.99

Probable Cause

$10.87

Probable Cause: Series (Probable Cause: The Human Factor / Mechanics of Failure / Unseen Dangers / Acceptable Risk) [Region 2]

$32

Probable Cause, Re-Thinking the JFK Plot

$10.99 $8.83

Probable Cause

$10.87

“No Probable Cause”

$18.99 $18.99

The will is a product of fraud

Fraud is a legal term that refers to deceptive illegal practices. It occurs when someone intentionally misrepresents the truth and causes another person to suffer losses due to that fabrication. There are four general elements of fraud: false representations of material facts to the testator; knowledge by the perpetrator that the representations are false; intent that the representations be acted upon; and resulting injury.

Will fraud can occur at different stages of creation, execution, and administration. Fraud during the creation of a will can manifest in many ways. For example, if the creator receives false or misleading information about the terms, document, beneficiaries, or other integral facts about the will, this constitutes fraud. Another common type of fraud is when someone pressures or unduly influences a person to change a will. In most cases of undue influence, the victim is older and suffers from physical or neurological impairments, like dementia or Alzheimer's.

Fraud can also occur during the execution of a will. For example, if someone forges the signature of the person executing the will or misleads them about the content or intentions of the document they are signing. Similarly, if the testator is told that the will they signed was something other than a will, this constitutes fraud.

Fraud in the administration of a will can occur when the trustee or executor deliberately decreases the value of an estate or a family member hides or destroys a will. There are countless examples of fraud in this phase, and it is imperative to contact a lawyer to evaluate and prove these cases.

The testator was under duress

Contesting a will can be a long and complicated process, and it's important to understand the legal grounds for doing so. One such ground is the allegation that the testator (the person who made the will) was under duress.

Duress is a legal term that refers to a situation where a person is threatened or subjected to violence, resulting in a change to their will that favours the intimidator. In the context of will contests, duress is often confused with undue influence, as both involve improper persuasion that leads to changes in a will. However, they are distinct concepts. Undue influence typically arises from a person in a confidential relationship with the testator, who improperly convinces the testator to make changes to their will for their benefit. On the other hand, duress involves explicit threats or acts of violence that coerce the testator to make changes against their true wishes.

To successfully contest a will on the basis of duress, it is essential to gather compelling evidence. This may include depositions, expert witnesses, interrogatories, witness interviews, subpoenaed documents, and other forms of evidence. An experienced attorney will be able to guide you through the process of presenting this evidence in accordance with the Rules of Evidence and navigating the complexities of the legal system.

It is worth noting that not everyone has standing to bring a duress or coercion will contest challenge. Only an "interested party," such as a beneficiary directly affected by the change, can initiate this type of challenge. Others who may be aware of the duress but are not directly impacted do not have legal standing to bring the matter to court.

When contesting a will based on duress, it is crucial to act within the statute of limitations. Each state has its own time limits for filing legal papers, which can range from a few weeks to a few years. Consulting with a probate or estate planning lawyer can help you understand the specific requirements and procedures in your state.

Frequently asked questions