Understanding Obstruction: When Does Hindering Become A Crime?

Obstruction of a law enforcement officer involves willfully hindering, delaying, or obstructing police officers in the discharge of their official duties. This can take various forms, including non-compliance during police stops, refusing to be handcuffed, providing false information, or tampering with evidence. Obstruction charges are typically categorized as misdemeanors or felonies, depending on the severity of the act. Misdemeanor obstruction may result in fines or short-term imprisonment, while felony obstruction, such as using threats or violence against an officer, can lead to more severe penalties, including longer prison sentences. It is important to note that mere words are not sufficient for an obstruction charge, and the police officer's actions must be within their lawful authority.

Explore related products

Obstruction of Congress: Federal Law

$36.49 $57

by John C. Maxwell The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork: Embrace Them and Empower Your Team [Unabridged](text only)1st (First) edition[Hardcover]2001

$32.01

The Law of Success: In Sixteen Lessons: Complete and Unabridged

$0.99 $9.95

Obstruction of Justice: An Overview of Some of the Federal Statutes That Prohibit Interference with Judicial, Executive, or Legislative Activities

$17.99 $17.99

Modern Constitutional Law: Cases and Notes, Unabridged, 11th – CasebookPlus (American Casebook Series)

$275

2014 Supplement to Employment Law, Cases and Materials, Concise and Unabridged (University Casebook Series)

$59.62

Non-compliance during police stops

Providing false or misleading information during a police stop is another form of non-compliance that can lead to obstruction charges. This includes giving incorrect information or refusing to provide identification, which can impede an officer's ability to conduct an investigation or make an arrest. Such actions can result in fines or imprisonment, depending on the jurisdiction and severity of the offence.

Refusing to be handcuffed or physically distancing oneself from an officer during a police stop can also be considered non-compliant behaviour. This can escalate the situation and lead to charges of resisting arrest or assaulting a police officer, which carry additional penalties.

Tampering with evidence is a severe form of non-compliance that can occur during a police stop. This includes destroying, hiding, or altering evidence to hinder an investigation. Such actions can constitute a separate criminal offence and carry significant penalties, including imprisonment and fines.

It is important to note that the specific laws and penalties related to non-compliance during police stops can vary across different jurisdictions. As such, individuals should be aware of their rights and the potential consequences of their actions to avoid obstruction charges and associated penalties.

Refusal to be handcuffed

Refusing to be handcuffed can be considered obstructing or resisting an officer, which is a criminal offence. In the case of US vs. Williams, the defendant was charged with resisting or obstructing an officer when he refused to be handcuffed. This provided the officer with probable cause to arrest him.

However, it is important to note that the use of handcuffs during a traffic stop may violate the Fourth Amendment if it turns the encounter into a de-facto arrest without probable cause. A de-facto arrest occurs when an officer's actions during an investigative detention become too intrusive, such as using handcuffs or placing someone in the back of a police car, to the extent that a reasonable person would believe they are under arrest.

In general, obstruction of justice or hindering apprehension refers to preventing or attempting to prevent a police officer from performing their lawful duties. This can include interfering with an arrest or other law enforcement activities. Obstruction charges often arise from interactions with police officers, and words alone are typically not enough to sustain an obstruction charge. The defendant must have engaged in conduct that affirmatively prevents the officer from carrying out their lawful duties.

It is important to comply with police commands and not to obstruct their movements. Individuals have the right to remain silent and do not have to answer questions about their activities or whereabouts. However, refusing to identify oneself when asked by an officer may result in arrest in some states.

Providing false information

Providing false or misleading information to the police during an investigation can be considered obstruction of justice and is a criminal offence. Obstruction of justice is a broad offence that includes a wide range of activities, but it generally refers to interfering with or hindering the administration of law or another governmental function.

The legal definition of obstruction of a law enforcement officer typically involves willfully hindering, delaying, or obstructing police officers in their official duties. This can include giving false information, refusing to provide identification, or physically interfering with an arrest. These actions can result in fines or short-term imprisonment.

It is important to note that mere words are typically not enough to constitute obstruction of justice. The defendant must have engaged in conduct that actively prevents the officer from performing their lawful duties. Additionally, the obstruction must be in relation to something within the officer's lawful authority, as obstruction charges cannot be based on a police officer's unlawful activity.

The penalties for obstructing a law enforcement officer vary depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the offence. In some cases, obstruction may be classified as a misdemeanour, while in other cases, it may be considered a felony. Felony obstruction involves more severe actions, such as using threats or violence against an officer, and can lead to longer prison sentences and heavier fines.

It is always advisable to seek legal counsel if facing obstruction charges, as there may be defences available, such as unlawful arrest or lack of intent, that can be raised to invalidate the charges.

Explore related products

2016 Supplement to Family Law, Cases and Materials, Unabridged and Concise, 6th Editions (University Casebook Series)

$38.22

2015 Supplement to Family Law, Cases and Materials, Unabridged and Concise 6th Editions (University Casebook Series)

$31.12

The Ten Commandments: The Significance of God's Laws in Everyday Life

$11.99 $19.99

Obstruction of Justice: How the Deep State Risked National Security to Protect the Democrats

$15.67 $28.99

Climate Obstruction: A Global Assessment

$34.99 $164

Obstruction of Justice: A Novel (Nina Reilly)

$7.99 $21.49

Tampering with evidence

Common examples of evidence tampering include eating or swallowing evidence to prevent its discovery, such as during a police drug raid, or wiping away fingerprints at a crime scene. Tampering with evidence charges rarely occur in isolation and are often filed alongside other criminal charges. For example, a person charged with drug trafficking may claim they threw away an old phone, denying knowledge that it could be relevant to a crime. In such cases, the prosecution must prove that the accused was aware of a current or future investigation or proceeding and intended to interfere with it.

In the United States, federal law prohibits tampering with evidence related to a federal investigation or bankruptcy proceeding. Evidence tampering is a serious offence, and conviction of a federal tampering offence can result in significant penalties. In the state of Florida, tampering with or fabricating physical evidence is classified as a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison, five years of probation, and a $5,000 fine.

Resisting arrest

The severity of the offence varies depending on the specific actions taken and the jurisdiction in which it occurs. In some cases, resisting arrest can be charged as a misdemeanour, resulting in fines or short-term imprisonment. More severe cases, such as using threats or violence against an officer, can be charged as felonies and lead to longer prison sentences and heavier fines.

It is important to note that mere words are not enough to constitute resisting arrest. The defendant must have engaged in conduct that affirmatively prevents the officer from performing their duties. Additionally, the actions of the defendant must have hindered the officer from carrying out something within their lawful authority, as obstruction charges cannot be based on a police officer's unlawful activity.

Defendants charged with resisting arrest should seek legal representation to understand their rights and plan their defence. An experienced lawyer can review the specific circumstances of the case and determine the potential consequences, which may vary depending on the state or jurisdiction.

Frequently asked questions