The Constitution's Religious Freedom Safeguards

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution contains two clauses that guarantee freedom of religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing a religion, while the Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion without interference from the government. These clauses, drafted by James Madison, were added to the Constitution in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, which aimed to preserve individual freedoms and limit governmental power. While these clauses protect religious freedom, there are permissible restrictions on these freedoms, and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, help to resolve conflicts and interpret the First Amendment.

Explore related products

Religious Freedom and the Constitution

$25.59 $32

Constitutions and Religious Freedom (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)

$138

Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer

$8.7 $28.99

The Constitution of Religious Freedom: God, Politics, and the First Amendment

$34.99

The Impossibility of Religious Freedom: New Edition

$24.15 $35

Christianity and the Constitution: The Faith of Our Founding Fathers

$30.99 $45

The Establishment Clause

The precise definition of "establishment" is unclear. Historically, it meant prohibiting state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. Today, what constitutes an "establishment of religion" is often governed under the three-part test set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971). Under the "Lemon" test, the government can assist religion only if:

• The primary purpose of the assistance is secular.
• The assistance must neither promote nor inhibit religion.
• There is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

One point of contention regarding the Establishment Clause is how to frame government actions that implicate religion. For example, while it is clear that cities cannot install new religious monuments on public land, there is fierce debate over whether existing monuments should be removed.

The Free Exercise Clause

The text of the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law [...] prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This amendment was drafted by James Madison, who based his work on the Virginia Declaration of Rights. Madison's intention was to preserve individual freedoms and limit governmental power.

The First Amendment

The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing a religion. Historically, this meant prohibiting state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. Today, the definition of "establishment of religion" is often governed by the three-part "Lemon" test set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971). Under this test, the government can assist religion only if:

• The primary purpose of the assistance is secular.
• The assistance must neither promote nor inhibit religion.
• There is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion, or no religion at all, without interference from the government. This includes the right to hold whichever religious beliefs they choose, regardless of whether they adhere to the principles of a particular faith. The Supreme Court has clarified that constitutional protections extend only to sincerely held religious beliefs and activities, ensuring that purported religious beliefs are not motivated by non-religious ideologies.

While the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause generally protect religious freedom, there may be situations where they come into conflict. In such cases, federal courts, with the Supreme Court as the ultimate arbiter, help resolve these conflicts. The Supreme Court has developed frameworks and legal standards, such as the strict scrutiny test, to determine whether a governmental restriction on religious freedom is consistent with the First Amendment.

Explore related products

Religious Freedom (Penguin Liberty)

$13.5 $15

Religious Liberty and the American Supreme Court: The Essential Cases and Documents

$65.54 $92

Religious Freedom and the Australian Constitution: Origins and Future (ICLARS Series on Law and Religion)

$55.99

Founding Faith: How Our Founding Fathers Forged a Radical New Approach to Religious Liberty

$13.79 $21

Religious Liberty and the American Supreme Court: The Essential Cases and Documents

$123.02 $158.4

The Separation of Church and State: Writings on a Fundamental Freedom by America's Founders

$21

The Lemon Test

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution contains two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing a religion, while the Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion as they please, as long as it does not conflict with "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest.

• The primary purpose of the assistance is secular;
• The assistance must neither promote nor inhibit religion; and
• There is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

By 2022, the Supreme Court had largely abandoned the Lemon Test as a way to measure compliance with the First Amendment, with some justices arguing that it could not resolve all Establishment Clause cases. Despite this, the test has been influential in shaping legal doctrine and has been applied in several significant court cases.

Religious Freedom Restoration Act

The First Amendment has two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing an official religion, while the Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion without interference from the government. These clauses, as outlined in the First Amendment, work together to protect religious freedom.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 further reinforces these protections. The RFRA states that the ""Government shall not substantially burden a person's exercise of religion," even if the burden is a result of a religiously neutral law. This Act initially applied to both state and federal laws. However, in 1997, the Supreme Court ruled in City of Boerne v. Flores that the RFRA is not a valid exercise of Congress's enforcement power, limiting its application to federal laws.

The RFRA provides an exception if two conditions are met. Firstly, the burden on religious exercise must be necessary for a "compelling government interest." A government interest is considered compelling if it is more than routine and directly relates to core constitutional issues. Secondly, the rule must be the least restrictive way to further the government interest. These conditions are evaluated through strict scrutiny, which requires a thorough examination of the government's justification for the burden.

The RFRA has been significant in several court cases. For instance, in O'Bryan v. Bureau of Prisons, it was determined that the RFRA applies to the actions of federal officers and agencies and governs the internal operations of the federal government. In Tanzin v. Tanvir (2020), the RFRA allowed individuals whose religious rights were violated by federal officers to seek remedies, including monetary damages.

While the RFRA's application to state governments was deemed unconstitutional, it has prompted the passage of state-level Religious Freedom Restoration Acts in 21 states. These state-level laws aim to protect religious freedom within state governments and local municipalities.

Frequently asked questions