Hamilton's National Bank: Constitutional Or Overreach?

Alexander Hamilton, the first secretary of the treasury, was a strong advocate for the creation of a national bank in the United States. He believed that a national bank was necessary to stabilize the economy, provide credit, and stimulate economic growth. Hamilton's proposal faced opposition, most notably from Thomas Jefferson, who argued that a national bank was unconstitutional and would unfairly favor urban financiers and merchants over rural farmers. Despite the controversy, Hamilton's bill passed in Congress and was signed into law by President George Washington in February 1791, establishing the First Bank of the United States. The constitutionality of the bank was later upheld in the landmark Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819.

Explore related products

Alexander Hamilton, annotated

$5.99 $5.99

Hamilton Report 1790 NThe Report Of The Secretary Of The Treasure (Alexander Hamilton) On The Subject Of A National Bank 1790 Poster Print by (18 x 24)

$28.25

On the constitutionality of a national bank (Perfect Library)

$14.9 $14.9

Hamiltonian Principles

$25.95

Alexander Hamilton: Documents Decoded

$66.59 $80.1

My World Too (TV Series)

$4.99

Hamilton's plan for a national bank

Alexander Hamilton, the first secretary of the treasury, was a strong advocate for the establishment of a national bank. He believed that a national bank was necessary to put the fledgling nation's finances in order. In December 1790, he submitted a report to Congress, outlining his proposal for the Bank of the United States. Hamilton's plan was based on the Bank of England's charter, which he believed could be adapted for an American context.

Hamilton's proposal included the establishment of bank branches in major port cities, the issuance of paper money or banknotes, and the provision of a safe place to keep public funds. He argued that a national bank would help stimulate the economy by providing credit and a stable monetary standard. It would also aid in revenue collection, lending to the Treasury, and marketing government debt to private investors. Additionally, Hamilton asserted that the Constitution conferred implied powers, including the power to establish a national bank, through the clause enabling Congress "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper" to execute its expressly granted powers.

Hamilton's plan faced opposition, most notably from Thomas Jefferson, who argued that a national bank would create a financial monopoly, favouring financiers and merchants over farmers and plantation owners. Jefferson also disagreed with Hamilton's interpretation of the Constitution, believing that the establishment of corporations and banks was not among the powers delegated to the United States by the Constitution. He further argued that a national bank would violate various state laws, including those against Mortmain, Alienage, and Monopoly.

Despite the opposition, Hamilton's bill cleared both the House and the Senate, and was signed into law by President George Washington in February 1791. The First Bank of the United States opened in Philadelphia in December 1791, with a twenty-year charter. However, constitutional challenges and opposition from state banks forced it to close after its charter expired in 1811.

Thomas Jefferson's opposition

Alexander Hamilton, the first secretary of the treasury under George Washington, proposed the idea of a national bank for the United States. Hamilton's proposal was based on Great Britain's national bank, and he wanted the government to develop bank branches in major cities, a uniform currency, and a place for the federal government to deposit or borrow money when needed. Hamilton's proposal was met with opposition from Thomas Jefferson, who believed that the creation of a national bank was not a power granted under the enumerated powers, nor was it necessary and proper.

Thomas Jefferson, a Republican, argued that too much power in the hands of the federal government would lead to tyranny. He believed that the states should charter their own banks and that a national bank unfairly favoured wealthy businessmen in urban areas over farmers in the country. Jefferson also argued that the Constitution did not grant the government the authority to establish corporations, including a national bank. He saw the national bank as a financial monopoly that might undermine state banks and adopt policies favouring financiers and merchants, who tended to be creditors, over plantation owners and family farmers, who tended to be debtors. Jefferson's vision of the United States was that of a chiefly agrarian society, not one based on banking, commerce, and industry.

Jefferson held that Congress should only take actions that were absolutely necessary and no more. He believed that the incorporation of a bank and the powers assumed by the bill had not been delegated to the United States by the Constitution. He argued that they were not among the powers specifically enumerated, as there was no power to lay taxes for the purpose of paying off debts, nor was any tax laid in the bill. Jefferson also questioned whether the convenience of having a national bank justified breaking down the fundamental laws of the states, such as those against Mortmain, the laws of Alienage, the rules of descent, the acts of distribution, the laws of escheat and forfeiture, and the laws of monopoly.

Despite Jefferson's opposition, a national bank was eventually established. Hamilton's bill cleared both the House and the Senate after much debate, and President Washington signed the bill into law in February 1791. The Bank of the United States, commonly referred to as the First Bank of the United States, opened in Philadelphia on December 12, 1791, with a twenty-year charter. However, by 1811, many of those who had opposed the bank in 1790-91 still opposed it, and the charter was allowed to expire.

The bank's constitutionality

Alexander Hamilton, the first secretary of the Treasury, was a strong advocate for the creation of a national bank in the United States. He believed that a national bank was necessary to help the fledgling nation's depressed economy, burdened by war debt, and a shortage of sound currency and bank credit. Hamilton's proposal was based on the Bank of England's charter, which he argued could provide a stable monetary standard and stimulate the economy.

However, the idea of establishing a national bank was met with opposition, most notably from Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They argued that the Constitution did not grant the federal government the authority to establish corporations or a national bank. Jefferson believed that a national bank would create a financial monopoly, favouring financiers and merchants over farmers and plantation owners. He also disagreed with Hamilton's interpretation of the Constitution, stating that it only allowed powers specifically enumerated and that the power to establish a bank was not among them.

Hamilton countered these arguments by asserting that the Constitution conferred implied powers along with those expressly stated. He pointed to the clause enabling Congress "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper" to carry out granted powers. In Hamilton's view, "necessary" meant useful and appropriate, and a national bank met this standard by aiding the government in collecting taxes, regulating trade, and creating a military.

Despite the opposition, Hamilton's proposal passed in the Senate and House, and President Washington signed it into law in February 1791. The constitutionality of a national bank was later affirmed in the 1819 McCulloch v. Maryland case, where the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had the power to incorporate a national bank under the necessary-and-proper clause, echoing Hamilton's arguments.

While the First Bank of the United States faced ongoing opposition and constitutional challenges, it laid the foundation for a second national bank and, eventually, the establishment of the Federal Reserve System. Hamilton's advocacy for a national bank remains a significant contribution to the economic development of the United States.

Explore related products

Great American Eclipse

$2.99

Trucker Rebellion: The Story of the Coutts Blockade

$1.99

Everybody's Children

$1.99

True Haunted Tales

$1.59

Vimy Underground

$2.99

Constitutional Law: Structure and Rights in Our Federal System, Eighth Edition

$169 $225

The bank's impact on the economy

Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, was a key architect of the fledgling United States' economy. He proposed the creation of a national bank, modelled after the Bank of England, to address the economic woes of the 1780s, including disrupted commerce, war debt, low currency value, and high inflation. Hamilton's plan faced opposition, notably from Thomas Jefferson, who argued that it was unconstitutional and would favour urban financiers and merchants over rural farmers. Despite this, the bank bill cleared Congress and was signed into law by President Washington in February 1791.

The First Bank of the United States, as it came to be known, opened in Philadelphia in December 1791 with a 20-year charter. The bank's branches were strategically located in port cities, facilitating tax collection from customs duties and enabling the financing of international trade. The bank's branch system allowed for greater reach and mobility of its notes compared to state banks. It also played a role in funding and encouraging westward expansion, with a branch established in New Orleans.

The establishment of the First Bank marked a shift towards a stronger central government and a Federalist financial revolution. It helped lay the foundation for a coherent national financial system, addressing issues of national and state war debts and providing stability to the country's finances. The bank's ability to issue paper money, provide secure storage for public funds, and offer banking facilities contributed to its impact on the economy.

The First Bank's success is evident in its 20-year prosperous run, during which it performed traditional banking functions effectively. Its influence extended along the Atlantic seaboard and the Gulf Coast, covering major cities from Boston to Charleston, Savannah, and New Orleans. The bank's performance and impact supported Hamilton's argument for implied powers in the Constitution, demonstrating the usefulness and appropriateness of certain actions, such as establishing a national bank, even if they were not explicitly mentioned in the document.

While the First Bank's charter expired in 1811, its legacy endured. The increase in state banks and their fear of competition and central power highlighted the continued relevance of a national banking system. This led to the National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864, which established a system of federally chartered national banks and shaped the modern national banking system in the United States. The First Bank of the United States thus played a pivotal role in shaping the country's economy and financial landscape, both during its time and in the years that followed.

The Federalist Party's support and opposition from the Democratic-Republican Party

The Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, dominated the national government from 1789 to 1801. The party was characterized by its support for a strong central government, federalism, modernization, industrialization, and protectionism. Hamilton's fiscal policies, such as his plan for a national bank, were a key aspect of the Federalist agenda. They argued that the Constitution conferred implied powers, including the power to establish a national bank, and that this bank would provide economic stability and stimulate the economy.

However, the Federalist Party faced opposition from the Democratic-Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson. The Democratic-Republicans feared that the concentration of power under the Federalists threatened individual freedoms and states' rights. They believed that Hamilton's policies, including the establishment of a national bank, would create a financial monopoly that favored the upper class, bankers, and merchants, while undermining state banks and hurting farmers and plantation owners. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans championed limited government and agrarian society, viewing the Federalists as a betrayal of the ideals of the American Revolution.

The Democratic-Republicans also took issue with the Federalist Party's monetary policies, which they believed gave too much power to the federal government and benefited the wealthy. Additionally, in foreign policy, the Democratic-Republicans favored France, which had supported the American Revolution, while the Federalists preferred closer ties with Great Britain, as seen in the controversial Jay Treaty.

The Federalist Party's dominance began to wane in 1800 when Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans won the presidential election. The Federalists never fully recovered from this loss, and by 1811, when the charter for the First Bank of the United States was up for renewal, the Democratic-Republicans were in control. Despite the Federalists' efforts, the bank's charter was not extended, and the party continued to decline, with its last presidential candidate in 1816.

Frequently asked questions