Kennedy's Crisis Diplomacy: Courage Or Folly?

was president kennedy

The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a defining moment in John F. Kennedy's presidency, bringing the world's two superpowers to the brink of nuclear conflict. Kennedy's handling of the crisis is a subject of historical debate, with some questioning whether his diplomacy was courageous or foolhardy. This crisis emerged when the US discovered evidence of Soviet nuclear missile sites in Cuba, just 90 miles off the coast of Florida. Kennedy's administration had to decide between peaceful diplomacy and military force to resolve the issue.

Characteristics Values
Leadership Displayed leadership, decision-making, and crisis management skills
Foreign Policy Success Handled the Cuban Missile Crisis, resulting in a diplomatic success and rising stature globally
Peace Diplomacy Collaborated with Khrushchev to pull the superpowers back from the brink of nuclear war
Crisis Management Managed the Berlin Crisis of 1961 without further escalation
Strategy Implemented a "flexible response" defense strategy to reduce the possibility of war
Negotiation Negotiated with Khrushchev to smooth the Berlin crisis
Diplomacy Practiced shuttle diplomacy with Castro to discuss improving relations
Anti-Communism Fought Communism in developing nations with the Peace Corps
Arms Control Oversaw the largest peacetime arms buildup in history and created the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
Trade Liberalized trade and promoted economic development in newly organized nations in Africa and Asia

cycivic

Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis

John F. Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis was a defining event of his presidency and of the Cold War. The discovery of Soviet ballistic missiles in Cuba in October 1962 brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Kennedy's handling of the crisis showcased his diplomatic savvy and crisis management skills, earning him the respect of Americans and others around the world.

Kennedy's initial response to the discovery of the missiles was to consider a series of airstrikes to take them out. However, he was persuaded by his advisers, including UN Ambassador Adlai Stevenson and his brother and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, to pursue a peaceful, diplomatic solution instead. Stevenson's memorandum to Kennedy argued for the use of diplomacy over force, citing the "incalculable consequences" of airstrikes and urging Kennedy to make clear that "the existence of nuclear missile bases anywhere is negotiable".

Kennedy's strategy of flexible response aimed to reduce the possibility of war by miscalculation. He engaged in a series of formal and informal exchanges with his Russian counterpart, Nikita Khrushchev, to find a solution to the crisis. Kennedy's willingness to negotiate smoothed the Berlin crisis and his personal diplomacy earned him the respect of Third World leaders.

The crisis was ultimately resolved when Khrushchev agreed to remove the missiles from Cuba in return for assurances that the United States would not invade Cuba and would remove its missiles from Turkey. Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis was considered a diplomatic success and a triumph of foreign policy, as it led to a peaceful resolution and pulled the superpowers back from the brink of nuclear war.

cycivic

Kennedy's role in the Vietnam War

John F. Kennedy's presidency was marked by the Cold War and the fight against Communism. He had a strong interest in foreign policy and international relations, which was evident during his time in Europe when his father was the US ambassador to Britain. As president, Kennedy encountered Communist challenges on multiple fronts, including in Vietnam.

Kennedy's involvement in Vietnam was influenced by the "domino theory", which suggested that if one country fell to Communism, surrounding countries would also fall, like dominoes. He believed that Vietnam was an opportunity to test the US's ability to conduct a "counterinsurgency" against Communist subversion and guerrilla warfare. Kennedy saw Vietnam as the cornerstone of the free world in Southeast Asia.

In response to the threat of Communism in Vietnam, Kennedy increased US military aid and advisers to the South Vietnamese government, which was facing challenges due to corruption, religious differences, and the successes of the Viet Cong guerrillas. He sent key advisers to Vietnam in 1961, who recommended an expanded program of military assistance, including helicopters and armoured personnel carriers, and the placement of American advisers in the Vietnamese government and military.

Kennedy also oversaw the creation of a new four-star general position, commander of the US Military Assistance Command Vietnam (USMACV), to guide the military assistance effort. While he was reluctant to commit combat troops to a war in Southeast Asia, he accelerated the flow of American aid and gradually increased US involvement in Vietnam.

The question of whether Kennedy would have escalated the conflict further or negotiated a withdrawal remains a subject of debate among historians. Some argue that he would not have made the same decision as his successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, to go to war. Kennedy's assassination in 1963 and the subsequent coup against the South Vietnamese leader, Ngo Dinh Diem, contributed to the instability and made policymaking in Vietnam more challenging.

cycivic

Kennedy's anti-Communism stance

John F. Kennedy's political career played out through the Cold War, and his presidency saw some of the tensest moments of the era. Kennedy's anti-communism stance was a dominant theme in his foreign policy, which was focused on containing communism and reversing communist progress in the Western Hemisphere.

In his 1961 inaugural address, Kennedy presented a blueprint for his administration's foreign policy initiatives, stating that the American people would:

> pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and success of liberty.

He also stressed the contest between the free world and the communist world, and his belief that the US had the ability and power to influence international events for the better. He said:

> In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom from its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility – I welcome it.

In South Vietnam, Kennedy struggled to control the Communist insurgency and stop the spread of communism. He threatened to cut off aid to the country's president, Ngo Dinh Diem, if he did not institute democratic reforms. When Diem ignored these warnings, Kennedy approved a coup by some of Diem's generals, which ultimately led to Diem's death.

cycivic

Kennedy's foreign policy team

John F. Kennedy's foreign policy team was assembled with the aim of reenergizing the foreign policy establishment. The team was made up of young White House and National Security Council advisers, including McGeorge Bundy, Walt Rostow, Ted Sorensen, and Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy's closest adviser was his brother, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, who played a significant role in devising a solution to the crisis that avoided war with the USSR.

Kennedy's strategy of flexible response was managed by Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and aimed to reduce the possibility of war by miscalculation. This strategy was implemented in the Cuban Missile Crisis, resulting in a peaceful resolution. Kennedy's handling of the crisis showcased his diplomatic savvy and bravado, and his stature rose in the eyes of Americans and others around the world.

However, Kennedy's policies also had setbacks, such as the escalation of the Vietnam War and the Bay of Pigs invasion, which was a clandestine invasion of Cuba by a brigade of Cuban exiles that failed due to faulty intelligence. Despite these setbacks, Kennedy's foreign policy team is generally seen as successful in managing international relations during a tense period of the Cold War.

cycivic

Kennedy's relationship with Khrushchev

John F. Kennedy's relationship with Nikita Khrushchev was a complex one, marked by diplomatic tensions and efforts to avoid nuclear conflict. Kennedy's political career unfolded during the Cold War, and he faced significant challenges in his encounters with the Soviet Union and communism.

Kennedy and Khrushchev's first and only summit took place in Vienna in June 1961, just weeks after the Bay of Pigs invasion, which had been a failure for the US. Kennedy, who was only 44 years old at the time and had been president for less than five months, wanted Khrushchev to take him seriously as a leader. However, he was unprepared for the meeting, and Khrushchev dominated the discussions. The Soviet Premier was more experienced and aggressive in their debates about communist ideology and the balance of power between the US and the Soviet Union. Kennedy's admissions about the balance of forces between the two sides played into Khrushchev's desire to be seen as equals with the US.

Despite their differences, both leaders shared a desire to avoid nuclear conflict. After the Vienna summit, Kennedy and Khrushchev continued to communicate and develop their relationship, even though they never met in person again. The Berlin Crisis of 1961 was a significant issue between the two leaders. Khrushchev wanted to close off the flow of refugees from Communism in Berlin, threatening war if Kennedy intervened. Kennedy responded by increasing US combat forces and obtaining funds for weapons, but ultimately, the crisis was eased with the construction of the Berlin Wall, which Kennedy accepted as "better than a war".

The Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Kennedy and Khrushchev's negotiations during this crisis were critical in de-escalating tensions and finding a peaceful resolution. Kennedy's diplomacy and leadership were crucial in this regard, and he collaborated with Khrushchev to pull the superpowers back from the brink. Khrushchev publicly agreed to remove Soviet missiles from Cuba in exchange for assurances that the US would not invade, while Kennedy secretly promised to remove American missiles from Turkey. This outcome enhanced Kennedy's stature as a diplomatic success in foreign policy.

Overall, Kennedy's relationship with Khrushchev was marked by challenges and tensions, but it also included moments of cooperation and compromise, particularly in the aftermath of the Vienna summit and during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Kennedy's willingness to negotiate and his commitment to avoiding nuclear conflict were key aspects of their complex dynamic.

Frequently asked questions

The Cuban Missile Crisis was a confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. It was caused by the discovery of Soviet nuclear missile sites in Cuba, just 90 miles off the coast of Florida.

President Kennedy initially met with his advisers in secret for several days to discuss the problem. He then decided to place a naval blockade, or "quarantine", around Cuba to prevent the Soviets from bringing in more military supplies and demanded the removal of the missiles already there.

The crisis ended when Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev agreed to remove the missiles from Cuba in exchange for the removal of American Jupiter missiles from Turkey. The Cuban Missile Crisis is considered a significant event during the Cold War and a defining moment in Kennedy's presidency.

Diplomacy played a crucial role in resolving the Cuban Missile Crisis. Despite initial calls for an airstrike, Kennedy's adviser, Adlai Stevenson, advocated for a diplomatic approach, urging Kennedy to negotiate the elimination of missile bases to avoid escalation to nuclear war. Kennedy himself also urged Americans to reexamine Cold War stereotypes and called for a strategy of peace.

President Kennedy's diplomacy during the Cuban Missile Crisis can be seen as a courageous act. He chose to pursue a peaceful resolution through diplomacy, despite the presence of nuclear weapons and the potential for escalation. Kennedy's decision to negotiate and compromise, rather than resort to military action, ultimately led to a successful outcome and a reduction in tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment