The Judiciary Act: Is Section 13 Constitutional?

Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is a federal statute enacted in the United States that established the federal judiciary system and outlined the powers of the Supreme Court. One of its key provisions, as outlined in Section 13, is the authorization for the Supreme Court to issue writs of prohibition and mandamus under specific circumstances. This section has been subject to legal debates, with some questioning its constitutional validity. The Act also addressed the composition of the Supreme Court, the creation of judicial districts, and the removal of lawsuits to federal courts, marking a significant shift in the nation's judicial system.

Explore related products

Digital Millennium Copyright Act section 104 report

$22.99

Digital Music Licensing And Section 115 Of The Copyright Act

$30.99

Labor, agricultural, dairy, and horticultural organizations. Hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on the judiciary, United States Senate, ... section 6 of the act of October 15, 1916,

$17.75

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$238.73 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

The Supreme Court's exclusive jurisdiction

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal judiciary of the United States. Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution states that the "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior Courts" as Congress saw fit to establish. The Act set the number of Supreme Court justices at six: one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices.

Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 authorized the Supreme Court to have exclusive jurisdiction over certain matters. This included "exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies of a civil nature, where a state is a party, except between a state and its citizens". The Supreme Court was also given exclusive jurisdiction over suits or proceedings against ambassadors, or other public ministers, and their staff, as long as it was consistent with the law of nations.

The Act also gave the Supreme Court original (but not exclusive) jurisdiction over suits brought by ambassadors or other public ministers, as well as those involving consuls or vice consuls. In these cases, the Supreme Court could issue writs of prohibition to the district courts and writs of mandamus to any courts or persons holding office under the authority of the United States.

The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal judiciary system of the United States. Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution states that the "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior Courts" as Congress saw fit to establish.

Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 outlines the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. It states that the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies of a civil nature where a state is a party, except between a state and its citizens, or between a state and citizens of other states or aliens. In the latter case, the Court has original but not exclusive jurisdiction.

The Act further grants the Supreme Court exclusive jurisdiction over suits or proceedings against ambassadors, other public ministers, their domestics, or domestic servants, as a court of law can exercise consistently with the law of nations. The Court also has original but not exclusive jurisdiction over suits brought by ambassadors or other public ministers or suits in which a consul or vice consul is a party.

Section 13 also addresses the trial of issues in fact in the Supreme Court. It stipulates that in all actions at law against citizens of the United States, the trial shall be by jury. This section also authorizes the Supreme Court to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts when they are proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Additionally, it grants the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law to any courts or persons holding office under the authority of the United States.

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, as outlined in Section 13, was further elaborated in subsequent sections of the Judiciary Act. For example, Section 8 of the Act outlines the oath of office for justices of the Supreme Court and district judges, emphasizing their duty to "administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich" in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the United States.

The role of Congress in establishing inferior courts

The Judiciary Act of 1789 was a United States federal statute enacted on September 24, 1789, during the first session of the First United States Congress. It established the federal judiciary system of the United States, outlining the structure and procedures of the courts. The Act set the number of Supreme Court justices at six: one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices.

Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, on which the Judiciary Act is based, states that the "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior Courts" as Congress establishes. This granted Congress the power to create inferior courts, decide their composition and procedures, and regulate their jurisdiction and the issuance of writs.

Section 13 of the Judiciary Act specifically addresses the Supreme Court's jurisdiction. It grants the Supreme Court exclusive jurisdiction over controversies of a civil nature involving states, with certain exceptions, and jurisdiction over suits or proceedings against ambassadors or other public ministers, within the bounds of international law. It also stipulates that trials in the Supreme Court against citizens of the United States shall be decided by a jury.

Additionally, Section 13 authorizes the Supreme Court to issue writs of prohibition to district courts when they are acting as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. It also empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus to any courts or persons holding office under the authority of the United States, in cases warranted by law.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 played a significant role in shaping the federal judiciary and clarifying the powers of Congress and the courts in the United States. It addressed key aspects of the judicial system, including the removal of lawsuits to federal courts, the creation of the Office of Attorney General, and the establishment of United States Attorneys and Marshals in each judicial district.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$305

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$95 $345

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28

The constitutionality of the Judiciary Act's removal jurisdiction

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal judiciary of the United States, setting the number of Supreme Court justices at six: one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices. The Act also created 13 judicial districts within the 11 states that had ratified the Constitution at that time.

Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 authorized the Supreme Court to issue writs of prohibition to district courts when they were proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. It also empowered the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus to any courts or persons holding office under the authority of the United States. The writ of mandamus could only be issued when authorized by a constitutional statute and within the limits imposed by the common law and the separation of powers.

In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the portion of Section 13 that authorized the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus in the exercise of its original jurisdiction was held invalid. In another case, Missouri v. Jenkins, the Court rejected a claim that a federal court exceeded its judicial power under Article III by ordering local authorities to increase taxes for desegregation remedies. However, the Court refused to rule on the constitutional issues presented by the state's claim that the district court had exceeded its powers in a prior order directly raising taxes.

The constitutionality of the Judiciary Act's writs

The Judiciary Act of 1789 was a federal statute enacted on September 24, 1789, during the first session of the First United States Congress. It established the federal judiciary of the United States, setting the number of Supreme Court justices at six: one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices.

Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 authorized the Supreme Court to "issue writs of prohibition to the district courts when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States."

The writs of mandamus could only be issued when authorized by a constitutional statute and within the limits imposed by the common law and the separation of powers. The constitutionality of the writs was questioned, as nowhere in the Constitution is the power to issue them vested in the federal courts. This raised the question of whether Congress could suspend the writ de facto by declining to authorize its issuance.

In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the portion of Section 13 that authorized the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus in the exercise of its original jurisdiction was held invalid. This case demonstrated the complex constitutional issues surrounding the Judiciary Act's writs and the ongoing debate over the federal judiciary's powers.

Frequently asked questions