The North's Defiance: Fugitive Slave Act's Constitutional Crisis

The Fugitive Slave Act, passed in 1793 and again in 1850, was a highly controversial law that required all escaped slaves to be returned to their slave owners and that officials and citizens of free states cooperate in the capture of fugitive slaves. The Act was passed to address Southern concerns that free states would become safe havens for runaway slaves. However, the Act faced strong opposition, particularly in the North, where it was seen as a violation of fundamental rights and an attempt to legalize kidnapping. Northern states, including Vermont and Wisconsin, passed laws to nullify the Fugitive Slave Act, and abolitionists worked to assist runaways in escaping to Canada. The Act contributed to growing tensions between the North and South over slavery and was a factor leading up to the American Civil War.

Explore related products

The War Before the War: Fugitive Slaves and the Struggle for America's Soul from the Revolution to the Civil War

$11.99 $18

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850: The History of the Controversial Law that Sparked the Confederacy’s Secession and the Civil War

$7.24 $6.95

Fugitive Slave on Trial: The Anthony Burns Case and Abolitionist Outrage (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$24.99 $29.99

A Defence for fugitive slaves, against the acts of Congress of February 12, 1793, and September 18, 1850

$6.15 $14.99

The Duty of Disobedience to the Fugitive Slave Act

$39.9 $5.29

Life of Isaac Mason as a Slave

$4.94 $4.94

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was deemed unconstitutional by the Wisconsin Supreme Court

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was a highly controversial law that required all escaped slaves to be returned to their owners, even if they were in a free state. It was passed by the 31st United States Congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the Compromise of 1850 between Southern interests in slavery and Northern Free-Soilers. The Act contributed to the growing polarization of the country over the issue of slavery and was one of the factors that led to the start of the American Civil War.

In 1855, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, led by Justice Abram Smith, became the only state high court to declare the Fugitive Slave Act unconstitutional. This decision was made in the case of In re Booth, which involved fugitive slave Joshua Glover and Sherman Booth, who led efforts to thwart Glover's recapture. Booth, a leader of Wisconsin's abolitionists, had rallied a crowd to free Glover from jail and help him escape to Canada. The Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision set off a political controversy and kept the state in turmoil until the eve of the Civil War.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court's ruling was based on the argument of states' rights, which had been used by Southern states to resist efforts to restrict slavery. While this argument was successful in the Booth case, it was not without its critics. Justice Samuel Crawford of the Wisconsin Supreme Court dissented from Smith's decision, agreeing with lawyer Edward Ryan, who cautioned that courts encouraging defiance of laws would do permanent damage to the ideal of equal and impartial justice.

In 1859, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in Ableman v. Booth, with jury nullification occurring as local Northern juries refused to convict individuals accused of violating the Fugitive Slave Act. Despite this, the Wisconsin Supreme Court's initial declaration that the Fugitive Slave Act was unconstitutional stood as a significant moment in the ongoing conflict between pro-slavery and abolitionist forces in the United States.

The Act was unpopular in the North, with many Northern states refusing to enforce it

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was highly unpopular in the North, where it was seen as an imposition of Southern interests in slavery on Northern Free-Soilers. The Act required that all escaped slaves, upon capture, be returned to their owners, even if they were in a free state. It also mandated that officials and citizens of free states had to cooperate in the capture and return of fugitive slaves. This was deeply unpopular in the North, where many people considered slavery to be immoral and opposed the idea of being forced to return escaped slaves to their owners.

The Act was passed by the 31st United States Congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to resolve the issue of slavery in the United States. However, the Act ended up contributing to the growing polarization of the country over slavery, rather than resolving the issue. It was one of the factors that led to the founding of the Republican Party and the start of the American Civil War.

In the North, many people refused to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act, with some even forming clandestine resistance groups to help escaped slaves avoid capture. Several Northern states passed so-called "Personal Liberty Laws", which gave accused runaway slaves the right to a jury trial and protected free blacks from being illegally captured and sold into slavery. States like Vermont, Wisconsin, Michigan, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Pennsylvania passed laws that were specifically intended to nullify the Fugitive Slave Act. For example, in 1855, the Wisconsin Supreme Court declared the Fugitive Slave Act unconstitutional, and local Northern juries often acquitted men accused of violating the law.

The unpopularity of the Fugitive Slave Act in the North highlighted the deep divisions within the United States over the issue of slavery and the tensions between the North and the South. The Act's enforcement was a major source of conflict, and it ultimately contributed to the outbreak of the American Civil War.

The Act contributed to the founding of the Republican Party

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was a highly controversial piece of legislation that exacerbated tensions between the North and the South. The Act was passed by the 31st United States Congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to address the growing divide between the Northern free states and the Southern slave states. The Act required that all escaped slaves be returned to their slave owners and that officials and citizens of free states cooperate in capturing and returning fugitive slaves. This made the federal government responsible for finding, returning, and trying escaped slaves, and it increased federal power in the rendition process.

The Fugitive Slave Act contributed to the founding of the Republican Party in several ways. Firstly, it heightened Northern fears of a "slave power" conspiracy, where Southern slaveholders were seen as conspiring to expand slavery and threaten the liberty of Northerners. This fear awakened many Northerners to the dangers of slavery and increased anti-slavery sentiment. Secondly, the Act was widely unpopular in the North and was seen as legalized kidnapping, leading to resistance and nullification efforts. States like Vermont, Michigan, and Wisconsin passed laws and measures to bypass and nullify the Fugitive Slave Act, with Vermont's Habeas Corpus Law rendering the Act unenforceable in the state. These nullification efforts were supported by abolitionists and anti-slavery activists, who saw the Act as an injustice and a threat to the freedom of both free blacks and escaped slaves.

The heavy-handed enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law and the injustices it caused further contributed to the political transformation in Northern states. The Republican Party emerged as a fusionist opposition movement opposed to the extension of slavery into federal territories. The Party introduced bills and resolutions to repeal the Fugitive Slave Act, and their victory in Indiana's elections in 1860, along with their capture of the gubernatorial race and a majority of congressional seats, demonstrated the shifting political landscape. The Fugitive Slave Act, therefore, played a significant role in galvanizing anti-slavery sentiment, empowering activists and politicians to organize and form the Republican Party, united against the expansion of slavery and in defense of individual liberty.

The Fugitive Slave Act's contribution to the founding of the Republican Party is undeniable. The Act's unpopularity in the North, the fear it instilled, and the injustices it caused fueled the fire of anti-slavery sentiment and provided a rallying point for those seeking to protect freedom and oppose the expansion of slavery. The Republican Party emerged as a force in American politics, challenging the status quo and shaping the country's trajectory toward the Civil War and beyond.

Explore related products

Slavery and the Supreme Court, 1825-1861

$59.99

Unconstitutionality of the Fugitive Slave Act: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in the Cases of Booth and Rycraft

$32.95

The Constitution of the United States With the Acts of Congress, Relating to Slavery, Embracing, the Constitution, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, the Missouri Compromise Act 1854 Leather Bound

$7.95

The Rendition of Fugitive Slaves: The Acts of 1793 and 1850, and the Decisions of the Supreme Court Sustaining Them; The Dred Scott Case What the Court Decided (Classic Reprint)

$18.57 $26.57

The Duty of Disobedience to the Fugitive Slave Act

$4.74 $4.95

The Constitution of the United States, With the Acts of Congress, Relating to Slavery, Embracing, the Constitution, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, the ... 1850, and the Nebraska and Kansas Bill, ...

$7.95 $11.99

The Act was one of the factors that led to the American Civil War

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was passed by the 31st United States Congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the Compromise of 1850. The Act required that all escaped slaves, upon capture, be returned to their owners, even if they were in a free state. It also made federal officials and citizens of free states complicit in the capture and return of fugitive slaves.

Many Northern states refused to enforce the law, and some even passed personal liberty laws that gave accused runaway slaves the right to a jury trial and protected free blacks. The severity of the 1850 Act led to an increase in abolitionists and the operations of the Underground Railroad, with new personal liberty laws enacted in many Northern states. The law became virtually unenforceable in certain Northern states, and by 1860, only around 330 enslaved people had been returned to their owners.

The Fugitive Slave Act brought the issue of slavery home to anti-slavery citizens in the North, as it made them and their institutions responsible for enforcing slavery. The Act was one of the factors that led to the founding of the Republican Party. Attempts to enforce the law aroused much bitterness and probably had as much to do with inciting sectional hostility as the controversy over slavery in the territories. South Carolina referred to the Northern personal liberty laws as justification for its secession from the Union in December 1860.

The Act violated the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was declared unconstitutional by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 1855, becoming the only state high court to do so. The Act contributed to the growing polarization of the country over the issue of slavery, and it was one of the factors that led to the start of the American Civil War.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, as well as the earlier Act of 1793, violated the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments of the US Constitution in several ways.

The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right of the people “to be secure in their persons” from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” The 1793 and 1850 laws authorized private individuals to “seize or arrest” alleged fugitives without any warrant or other judicial scrutiny, which allowed slave catchers without warrants to seize blacks in public and invade private homes or buildings in search of fugitive slaves. This was a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment.

The Fifth Amendment declares that no person can “be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” However, there was no due process in fugitive slave cases under the 1850 law, as the alleged fugitive was not allowed to testify on their own behalf, even to assert a case of mistaken identity. The law also incentivized judges to decide in favor of slave owners, as they received $10 if they decided in favor of the slave owner and only $5 if they decided in favor of freedom. This appeared, to many, to be a bribe to buy justice for the slave owner.

The Sixth Amendment requires that trials be before an “impartial jury” and that defendants have the right to subpoena witnesses on their behalf and have the assistance of counsel. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 prohibited the use of the writ of habeas corpus in fugitive slave cases, which prevented those arrested from being brought to trial and allowed the government to throw people in jail without charges. This was a violation of the right to due process guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment and the jury trial provision of the Sixth Amendment.

The Seventh Amendment guaranteed jury trials in civil cases, but the Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 ignored this protection. The 1793 law did not provide for a jury trial and allowed any magistrate to order that a black person be turned over to a slave catcher after a summary hearing. The 1850 law specifically denied alleged fugitives the right to a jury trial.

Frequently asked questions