
The United States Constitution is the oldest written national framework of government in the world, having governed the country for over two centuries. The document, which is less than 6,000 words long, has survived for so long due to its flexibility and adaptability to changing conditions. While the Constitution has been amended only 16 times since the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791, Congresses, presidents, and courts have reinterpreted it to meet the needs of the nation. The Constitution's durability is also attributed to the framers' intention to make it challenging to alter, ensuring its longevity and resilience.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Oldest written national framework of government in the world | Single framework of government for over two centuries |
| Flexible and adaptable | Open to interpretation and amendment |
| Does not specify the size of the Supreme Court | Supreme Court size has varied between 6, 7, 9, and 10 members |
| Does not explicitly grant the courts the power of judicial review | The US makes extensive use of judicial review |
| Does not bar anyone from voting | Qualifications for voting were left to individual states |
| Has been amended only 16 times since the Bill of Rights | 10 amendments constitute the Bill of Rights |
Explore related products
$9.99 $9.99
What You'll Learn
- The US Constitution is the world's oldest written national framework of government
- The document is flexible and adaptable, allowing for changing conditions
- The authors of the Constitution intentionally made it difficult to change
- The Federalists' belief in a strong central government helped secure its survival
- The Anti-Federalists' opposition was overcome with a vote now, amend later compromise

The US Constitution is the world's oldest written national framework of government
The framers of the Constitution, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington, designed a broad structure of government that allowed for future interpretation and re-interpretation. They left the system flexible enough to adapt to changing conditions, and the document itself is relatively concise at less than 6,000 words, which may have contributed to its durability.
One of the key debates during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 was congressional representation. The framers compromised by granting each state one representative for every 30,000 people in the House of Representatives and two representatives in the Senate. They also had to navigate contentious issues like slavery, temporarily resolving that the slave trade could continue until 1808.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution due to its resemblance to the strong central government they had recently overthrown, and because it lacked a bill of rights. However, the Federalists, who believed in the necessity of a robust central government, prevailed in the end. The Constitution's endurance can also be attributed to the careful consideration and compromise that went into its creation, as well as the difficulty of amending it.
The US Constitution has served as a model for other nations and stands in contrast to countries like France, which has had multiple distinct constitutional orders, and El Salvador, which has had 36 constitutions since 1824. The longevity of the US Constitution is a testament to its adaptability and the foresight of its framers, who laid the foundation for a nation that could evolve and endure.
Children of US Citizens: Are They Automatically Citizens?
You may want to see also

The document is flexible and adaptable, allowing for changing conditions
The US Constitution is the oldest written national framework of government in the world. While the US has been governed by a single framework of government for over two centuries, other nations have had multiple constitutional orders within the same timeframe. For instance, France has had 10 separate constitutional orders, including five republics, two empires, a monarchy, and two dictatorships.
The US Constitution has survived for over 200 years due to its flexible and adaptable nature, allowing for changing conditions. The document is not overly detailed, providing a broad structure for government while leaving room for interpretation and adaptation over time. The framers of the Constitution intended for it to be flexible, allowing for different interpretations and applications to meet the needs of the moment.
One example of the Constitution's adaptability is the varying size of the Supreme Court over the years. The Constitution does not specify the size of the Supreme Court, and the number of members has changed between six, seven, nine, and even ten. The power of judicial review, which is prominently exercised by American judges, is also not explicitly granted to the courts in the Constitution. Instead, it was established through state-level debates and the ratification process.
Another example of the Constitution's flexibility is the evolution of the presidency. When George Washington became president, he had five cabinet officers. Today, there are 14 executive departments and millions of federal employees, indicating a significant expansion of the presidency's authority. The framers of the Constitution expected Congress to be the dominant branch of government, but over time, the national government, including the presidency, has gained dominance.
While the Constitution has been amended only 16 times since the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791, Congress has considered thousands of proposals for amendments. The Constitution's authors made it challenging to amend, ensuring the document's stability and continuity.
The Supreme Court's Power: Understanding the Supremacy Clause
You may want to see also

The authors of the Constitution intentionally made it difficult to change
The United States Constitution is considered one of the most rigid constitutions in the world, with only 27 amendments since it was drafted in 1787. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s that the Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come". The authors of the Constitution, also known as framers, made it difficult to change by requiring a challenging and time-consuming amendment process.
The framers of the Constitution intended for it to be an enduring document that could meet future challenges and crises. They recognized the need for amendments but wanted to make the process of amending the Constitution difficult. Article V of the Constitution outlines the primary paths for making amendments. A proposed amendment must first be passed by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. The proposed amendment then needs to be ratified by legislatures or conventions in three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50). This process ensures that any changes to the Constitution have a significant impact on all Americans or secure the rights of citizens.
The proliferation of states has made the process of amending the Constitution even more challenging. When the Constitution was first enacted, there were only 13 states, and securing the agreement of three-quarters of the states was much easier than it is today with 50 states. The increase in the number of states has substantially increased the difficulty of amending the Constitution.
While the supermajorities required for an amendment have remained constant, the Constitution has evolved from being considered too simple to amend to being nearly impossible to amend today. This shift in perception highlights the increasing challenge of amending the nation's founding document.
Despite the challenges, proponents of amendments have not been deterred, with approximately 11,848 measures proposed to amend the Constitution from 1789 through January 3, 2019. However, the complexity of the process and the political divide in Congress have made it difficult for these proposals to succeed. The endurance of the Constitution over more than 200 years can be attributed to the framers' intention to create a durable document that could adapt to future needs through a rigorous amendment process.
When Does French Kissing Become Sexual Assault?
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$205 $81

The Federalists' belief in a strong central government helped secure its survival
The US Constitution has survived for over 200 years, making it the oldest written national framework of government in the world. The Federalists, who believed in a strong central government, played a crucial role in securing its survival.
The Federalists, supporters of the proposed Constitution, saw the need for a stronger central government to address the challenges facing the young nation. They argued that the weaknesses of the central government under the Articles of Confederation had led to issues such as territorial disputes, war pension disagreements, and trade and taxation conflicts between states. The Federalists believed that a strong central government was necessary to prevent the country from collapsing and to safeguard the liberty and independence won during the American Revolution.
The Federalist leaders, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington, played a strategic role in gaining support for the Constitution. They recognized the importance of the printed word, utilizing newspapers, articles, and pamphlets to explain their political plan and convince undecided Americans of the need for a stronger central government. The Federalists were well-organized, well-funded, and had the support of influential figures like Benjamin Franklin and George Washington. They also had experience in national-level work, which contributed to their effective leadership.
The Federalists faced opposition from the Anti-Federalists, who objected to the creation of a stronger central government. The Anti-Federalists argued that a powerful central government could lead to an abuse of power, reminiscent of the one they had overthrown. To address these concerns, the Federalists promised to add a Bill of Rights as amendments to the Constitution, which helped secure its acceptance and ratification by the states. The inclusion of a Bill of Rights ensured that specific freedoms and rights were guaranteed, addressing the fears of excessive central power.
The Federalists' belief in a strong central government influenced their policies and legislative battles in the 1790s. They advocated for a national bank, tariffs, and good relations with Great Britain, as seen in the Jay Treaty. While the Democratic-Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, opposed many Federalist policies, the Federalists held a strong base in cities and New England, contributing to their legislative successes.
In conclusion, the Federalists' belief in a strong central government was a driving force in securing the survival of the US Constitution. Their effective leadership, strategic use of media, and ability to address concerns through amendments contributed to the longevity of the Constitution, allowing it to adapt and endure for over 200 years.
Framers' Intent: Political Parties in Constitution Vision
You may want to see also

The Anti-Federalists' opposition was overcome with a vote now, amend later compromise
The United States Constitution is the world's oldest written national framework of government. It has survived for over 200 years, whereas France, in contrast, has had 10 separate and distinct constitutional orders in this time. How did the Constitution survive for so long?
One of the reasons is that the framers of the Constitution established a broad structure of government but also left the system flexible enough to adapt to changing conditions. The document is less than 6,000 words and is not overly detailed, allowing for reinterpretation. Over the years, Congresses, presidents, and the courts have reinterpreted the document to meet the needs of the moment. For example, the presidency has accumulated more and more authority since George Washington's time, and the national government has gradually become dominant over the states.
Another factor in the Constitution's longevity was the "vote now, amend later" compromise that helped secure its ratification in Massachusetts and, eventually, the final holdout states. The Federalists, who believed in a strong central government, needed to convert at least three states. The Anti-Federalists, who favoured strong state governments and a weak central government, fought hard against the Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights. The Anti-Federalists' opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
The Massachusetts ratifying convention met in Boston from January 8, 1788, to February 5, 1788, to discuss "the adoption of the federal Constitution." 370 delegates attended the convention, and the vote was expected to be close, with the Anti-Federalists possibly having the edge. In the end, the Federalists prevailed through a compromise proposed by John Hancock, who was supported by Samuel Adams and Rufus King. Hancock, who would become Vice-President, agreed not to run an opponent against the Federalists in the next gubernatorial election. The compromise was that Massachusetts would ratify the Constitution now with the expectation that amendments would be proposed later. This compromise became a model for the remainder of the ratification campaign across the country.
Workplace Harassment: Abusive Conduct and the Law
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The US Constitution is the oldest written national framework of government in the world and has endured for over 200 years due to a combination of factors, including its adaptability, the flexibility of its broad governmental structure, and the difficulty of amending it.
The US Constitution established a broad structure of government while maintaining enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances. Its authors intentionally made it difficult to amend, ensuring stability and continuity.
While there have been numerous proposals to amend the Constitution, it has only been changed 16 times since the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791. Notable amendments include the 11th Amendment in 1798, the 12th Amendment in 1804, the 22nd Amendment in 1951, and the 25th Amendment in 1967.
The US Constitution has faced several challenges, including disputes over congressional representation, slavery, and the balance of power between the states and the national government. The Anti-Federalists also opposed it due to its resemblance to the overthrown British government.
The interpretation of the Constitution has evolved over time. Initially, the states held more power, but the national government has gradually become dominant. The presidency has accumulated more authority, with Congress becoming less inclined to initiate policies.





![The philosophy of health; or, An exposition of the physical and mental constitution of man, with a view to the promotion of human longevity and happiness. Volume v. 1 1838 [Leather Bound]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81nNKsF6dYL._AC_UY218_.jpg)


















