The Supreme Court's Power: Understanding The Supremacy Clause

The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the US Constitution, is a founding principle of US constitutional law. It establishes the supremacy of federal laws, regulations, and treaties over state laws. The clause was included in response to the lack of a similar provision in the Articles of Confederation, which governed the US from 1781 to 1789. The Supremacy Clause has been crucial in shaping a strong federal government and ensuring finality in governmental decision-making. It provides that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties made under the authority of the US are the supreme Law of the Land, taking precedence over any conflicting state laws. This clause has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as upholding the principle of federal preemption, where federal law can expressly or impliedly override state law. The inclusion of the Supremacy Clause was not without controversy, but it ultimately prevailed during the ratification of the Constitution in 1788.

Explore related products

The Supremacy Clause: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Reference Guides to the United States Constitution)

$95

The U.S. Constitution: Explained--Clause by Clause--for Every American Today

$9.97 $12

Georgia's Constitution and Government, 10th Edition

$14.36 $15.95

The Constitution and Economic Regulation: Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment

$50.86 $62.99

"Medical" marijuana, federal drug law, and the constitution’s supremacy clause

$22.99

Great Cases in Constitutional Law

$44 $47

The Supremacy Clause's role in establishing a strong federal government

The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the US Constitution, is a foundational principle of US constitutional law. It establishes the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties as the "supreme law of the land", taking precedence over any conflicting state laws. This clause was included to address the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, which lacked a similar provision and resulted in federal statutes not binding state courts. The Supremacy Clause played a crucial role in establishing a strong federal government by providing a clear hierarchy of laws and resolving potential conflicts between federal and state authorities.

During the drafting of the Constitution, the Framers recognised the need for a provision like the Supremacy Clause to prevent political chaos and ensure stability. Without it, states and the federal government would constantly compete for primacy, leading to ongoing power struggles. By including the Supremacy Clause, the Framers intended to create a balance between the federal and state governments, with the former having the final say in case of disagreements. This balance is reflected in the clause's language, which states that the Constitution, federal laws made under it, and treaties made under the authority of the United States are the supreme law that "judges in every state shall be bound [by]".

The Supreme Court has relied on the Supremacy Clause to uphold federal supremacy and manage the nation's affairs. Throughout the nineteenth century, the Court applied the principle that federal law prevailed over conflicting state laws. This continued into the late twentieth century, with the Court recognising several types of preemption, including express and implied preemption. In cases of express preemption, federal law explicitly states its intent to override state law, while in implied preemption, this intent is inferred from the structure and purpose of the federal law.

The Supremacy Clause also contains the Constitution's most explicit references to "judicial review", the idea that courts are not bound by unconstitutional statutes. This aspect of the clause further strengthens the federal government's role by empowering judges to review and strike down laws that conflict with the Constitution. Overall, the Supremacy Clause has been instrumental in shaping the federal government's robust role and ensuring the finality of its decisions. It provides a framework for resolving disputes between federal and state authorities and reinforces the primacy of the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.

The Supremacy Clause's inclusion as a reaction to the Articles of Confederation

The Supremacy Clause, which establishes the supremacy of federal laws, regulations, and treaties over state laws, was included in the US Constitution as a reaction to the lack of such a provision in the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation, approved by the Continental Congress in 1777 and in effect from 1781 to 1789, served as the first Constitution of the United States. However, it did not provide sufficient power to the central government, leading to functional challenges.

Under the Articles of Confederation, federal laws could not supersede federal statutes and regulations, and state legislatures held all powers not explicitly granted to the federal government. This imbalance of power resulted in a weak central government that lacked the authority to effectively govern the nation. James Madison, in the Federalist Papers, recognized this issue and argued for the need for a supremacy clause to establish the supremacy of federal law and provide a balance between the federal and state governments.

The absence of a supremacy clause in the Articles of Confederation led to political difficulties, particularly regarding the enforcement of federal statutes in state courts. This prompted the Confederation Congress to call for a convention in 1787 to revise the Articles, ultimately leading to the inclusion of the Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution. The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution, asserts that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be the "supreme Law of the Land."

The inclusion of the Supremacy Clause was not without controversy, as it generated intense debates during the Constitution's ratification process. However, advocates of federal supremacy prevailed, and the Constitution was ratified in 1788 with the Supremacy Clause intact. In the following decades, the Supreme Court played a significant role in applying and interpreting the Supremacy Clause, shaping the balance of power between the federal and state governments.

The Supremacy Clause's reference to judicial review

The Supremacy Clause contains the Constitution's most explicit references to the concept of "judicial review". This concept holds that even duly enacted statutes do not provide rules of decision for courts if they are deemed to be unconstitutional.

The Supremacy Clause states that the Constitution, federal statutes, and treaties made under the authority of the United States are the "supreme Law of the Land". This means that these laws take precedence over any conflicting state laws or constitutions. The Clause also establishes that judges in every state are bound by these laws, regardless of any contrary state laws. This aspect of the Supremacy Clause was a notable departure from traditional British rule, where treaties made by the Crown did not have a domestic legal effect.

The Supremacy Clause plays a crucial role in resolving conflicts between state and federal law. It ensures that courts, rather than Congress or the President, are responsible for addressing these conflicts as judicial matters. By conditioning the supremacy of federal statutes on their constitutionality, the Supremacy Clause provides a check on federal power and reassures states that the federal government will remain within its assigned powers. This, in effect, reserves all remaining powers for the states or the people.

The Supreme Court has relied on the Supremacy Clause to assert its power to review state court decisions involving federal law and constitutional interpretation. Notably, in cases such as Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) and Cohens v. Virginia (1821), the Supreme Court asserted its ultimate authority to overrule decisions by state courts. In practice, this has allowed the Supreme Court to invalidate statutes that violate the Constitution or established treaties.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Confederate States of America

$14.99

Intention, Supremacy and the Theories of Judicial Review

$42.71 $61.99

Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change.

$33.48 $63

Essentials Of The American Constitution: The Supreme Court and the Fundamental Law

$61.99 $61.99

That Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution (New Forum Books Book 35)

$29.83 $47

Marbury v. Madison: The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$21.95 $29.99

The Supremacy Clause's application by the Supreme Court

The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, establishes the supremacy of federal laws, regulations, and treaties over state laws. It was included in the Constitution as the Articles of Confederation, which served as the first US Constitution from 1781 to 1789, lacked a similar provision. This often resulted in federal statutes not binding state courts, leading to concerns about political chaos and a weak central government.

The Supreme Court has played a significant role in applying the Supremacy Clause and shaping its interpretation. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, the Court relied on the Clause to establish a strong federal government and manage the nation's affairs. The Court invoked the Clause in early cases, such as Gibbons v. Ogden, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Ware v. Hylton, to assert that federal treaties and statutes took precedence over conflicting state laws. This allowed the federal government to enforce treaties and pass legislation without interference from uncooperative states.

During the latter half of the 19th century, the Supreme Court continued to apply the principle of federal supremacy over state law. However, the Court also embraced the doctrine of dual federalism, which maintained distinct and non-overlapping zones of constitutional authority for the federal government and the states. This approach minimized conflicts between federal and state authority.

In modern times, the Supreme Court has recognized various ways in which federal statutes can "preempt" or supersede state law. The Court has identified express preemption, where federal law explicitly states its intent to preempt state law, and implied preemption, where the intent to preempt is implicit in the structure and purpose of the federal law. The Court has also recognized subcategories of implied preemption, such as field preemption, where federal law is so pervasive that it leaves no room for state supplementation.

The Supreme Court has also addressed the enforceability of treaties under the Supremacy Clause. In Missouri v. Holland (1920), the Court held that the Supremacy Clause allows the federal government to make treaties that supersede state law, even if they abrogate states' rights under the Tenth Amendment. However, in Reid v. Covert (1957), the Court circumscribed this interpretation, stating that treaties and laws made pursuant to them must comply with the Constitution.

In summary, the Supreme Court has utilized the Supremacy Clause to establish federal authority and resolve conflicts between federal and state laws. While the Court has generally upheld the principle of federal supremacy, it has also recognized the importance of dual federalism and the limits of federal power as outlined in the Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause's impact on the role of state governments

The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the US Constitution, establishes the supremacy of federal laws, regulations, and treaties over state laws. This clause was included in the Constitution to address the lack of a similar provision in the Articles of Confederation, which governed the United States from 1781 to 1789. During the Confederation era, federal statutes did not bind state courts unless there was state legislation implementing them. This often led to political difficulties and concerns about constant political chaos, with states and the federal government continually jockeying for primacy.

The Supremacy Clause was designed to provide a balance between the federal government and state governments, ensuring that the Constitution and federal laws take priority over conflicting state laws. This balance is reflected in the doctrine of dual federalism, where the federal government and the states occupy distinct, non-overlapping zones of constitutional authority. While federal law prevails in cases of conflict, the Supreme Court has also recognised the importance of state regulatory authority and has narrowed the circumstances in which federal law can displace state law. This is known as the principle of federal preemption, where federal law can expressly or impliedly preempt state law.

The Supremacy Clause has had a significant impact on the role of state governments, limiting their power and authority in certain areas. State governments must adhere to the Constitution and federal laws, and cannot enact legislation that conflicts with them. This has resulted in a robust role for the federal government in managing the nation's affairs, with the Supreme Court relying on the Supremacy Clause to establish this role in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.

However, the Supremacy Clause does not require each state to base all of its laws on federal statutes. For example, while federal income taxes are established by Congress, state legislatures are not required to structure their tax systems in the same way. States have the autonomy to make different policy choices, such as favouring sales taxes over income taxes. The Supremacy Clause also does not require judges to conduct a specific analysis of federal statutes; instead, it describes the Constitution as the "supreme law of the land," providing a framework for judicial review and decision-making.

Overall, the Supremacy Clause has helped establish a strong federal government and provided a sense of finality in governmental decision-making. It has resolved the tension between federalism and nationalism by ensuring that nationalist values prevail within the scope of the federal government's powers. The Supremacy Clause has shaped the relationship between the states and the federal government, providing a clear framework for resolving conflicts between federal and state laws.

Frequently asked questions