Executive Orders: Constitutional Framers' Intent?

The United States Constitution does not explicitly mention or provide for executive orders. However, the authority to issue them is generally accepted as an inherent aspect of the president's power. The legal basis for executive orders comes from Article II of the Constitution, which grants the president broad executive powers, as well as the power to enforce laws and manage federal government resources and staff. Executive orders are directives issued by the president to manage operations of the federal government and must be supported by the Constitution or a law passed by Congress.

Explore related products

With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power

$47 $50

By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action (Studies in Government and Public Policy)

$32.98 $42.99

Executive Order: Images of 1970s Corporate America

$35.49 $45

Executive Orders and Proclamations

$31.95

Executive Orders of Donald J. Trump - Vol. I: The Complete Executive Orders of the 45th President of the United States - Vol I:2017-2018

$26.99

Executive Orders: Presidential Cocktail Recipes (Presidential Cocktails)

$6.99

Executive orders are directives by the president to manage operations of the federal government

In the United States, executive orders are directives issued by the president to manage the operations of the federal government. While the US Constitution does not explicitly mention or permit the use of executive orders, the president's authority to issue them is generally accepted as an inherent aspect of their executive power. Article II of the Constitution vests the president with executive power over the government, including the obligation to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed".

Executive orders are written, signed directives that order the government to take specific actions to ensure the laws are executed faithfully. They are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if they lack support by statute or the Constitution. The president cannot use executive orders to override federal laws and statutes, and they cannot sidestep the system of checks and balances in the Constitution. Executive orders cannot preempt the legislative process, and they cannot grant the president powers from other branches, such as the power vested in Congress to pass new statutes.

Executive orders are often used to direct executive branch agencies and staff to take or stop taking specific actions. They can also be used to implement new policies, such as declaring a new priority or rule for a federal agency like the Department of Education. Executive orders can also be used to suspend existing policies, such as when President Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War.

Executive orders can have a significant impact on the country, and they have been used by every president since George Washington. While some orders are mundane, such as declaring a federal holiday, others are among the most important actions taken by the US government, such as Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation. In recent times, President Joe Biden issued 42 executive orders in his first 100 days, while Donald Trump issued 143 in the same period, the most of any president.

The US Constitution does not explicitly mention executive orders

While the Constitution does not provide a direct definition or explicit authorisation for executive orders, it grants the president broad powers, including control and operation of the federal government, federal agencies, and foreign affairs. The president's ability to issue executive orders is also based on historical precedent, executive interpretations, and court decisions.

Executive orders are directives issued by the president that have the force of law and direct the actions of the executive branch and federal agencies. They are subject to judicial review and can be overturned if found to be unconstitutional or lacking support from statutes. The Supreme Court has ruled that executive orders must be rooted in the Constitution or authorised by Congress.

The president cannot use executive orders to make laws or override federal laws and statutes. They are bound by the Constitution's checks and balances, and any order that contradicts or violates the Constitution, federal laws, or Americans' fundamental rights can be struck down by the courts. For example, President Harry Truman's executive order seizing control of steel mills during the Korean War was ruled invalid by the Supreme Court in the Youngstown case, as it was deemed to be an attempt to make law rather than clarify or further an existing law.

Executive orders have been used by presidents throughout US history, with George Washington issuing the first one in 1789. They can be an effective way for presidents to implement policies and exercise their political will within the framework of the law.

The president's power to issue executive orders comes from the Constitution and powers granted by Congress

The president's power to issue executive orders is derived from the US Constitution and powers granted by Congress. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention or permit the use of executive orders, it vests executive powers in the president, making them the commander-in-chief and requiring them to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". This authority is outlined in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1, and Sections 2 and 3 of the Constitution.

The president's power to issue executive orders is also supported by Congress, which can grant additional powers through statutes. For example, under 8 U.S.C. § 1182, Aliens and Nationality, Congress has granted the president the power to "suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens" if deemed detrimental to US interests. Executive orders, therefore, have a constitutional basis in the president's broad power to issue directives and manage the federal government.

Executive orders are written directives signed by the president, ordering the government to take specific actions to enforce the law. They are a powerful tool for the president, as they carry much of the same authority as federal law. However, executive orders cannot override federal laws and statutes, and the president cannot use them to sidestep constitutional checks and balances or assume powers of other branches, such as Congress's power to pass new statutes.

The courts play a crucial role in reviewing the lawfulness of executive orders and ensuring they do not violate the Constitution, federal laws, or citizens' rights. If an executive order is found to exceed the president's authority, violate federal law, or infringe on civil liberties, the courts can declare it unlawful and strike it down. This judicial review helps maintain a balance of powers and uphold the rule of law.

While the president has the power to issue executive orders, they are subject to checks and balances. Congress can enact laws to reverse executive orders, and any future president can issue new executive orders to amend or rescind previous ones. Executive orders remain in force until they are cancelled, revoked, adjudicated unlawful, or expire.

Explore related products

The Executive Order: A Novel

$14.99 $16.02

Executive Orders and the Immigration Diviide: Navigating America's Turbulent Terrain

$17.99

Freedom to Serve (Critical Moments in American History)

$31.27 $52.99

American Government Explained: Bills, Budgets and Executive Orders Made Simple

$11.99

By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action (Studies in Government and Public Policy)

$32.99

Executive Order (The Chronicles Series)

$39.99

Executive orders cannot override federal laws and statutes

Executive orders are directives issued by the president of the United States that manage the operations of the federal government. They are based on Article II of the US Constitution, which vests the president with executive power and the obligation to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". While executive orders are a powerful tool for the president, they cannot override federal laws and statutes.

The US Constitution does not explicitly mention or permit the use of executive orders. Instead, the president's authority to issue executive orders is derived from their broad powers granted by the Constitution and Congress. These orders must be rooted in Article II of the Constitution or enacted by Congress through statutes. While the president has significant discretion in issuing executive orders, they cannot make law but can only clarify or further a law put forth by Congress or the Constitution.

For example, in the case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the Supreme Court held that President Harry Truman's executive order placing steel mills under federal control during a labour dispute in the Korean War was invalid. The Court ruled that the executive order attempted to make law rather than clarify or further an existing law, exceeding the president's authority. This case set a precedent for subsequent presidents to be cautious and cite the specific laws under which they act when issuing executive orders.

Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be overturned if they lack support by statute or the Constitution. Federal courts can review the lawfulness of an executive order and determine whether it violates the Constitution, federal laws, or Americans' fundamental rights. If an executive order is found to be unlawful or unconstitutional, it can be revoked, modified, or amended by the president or a future president.

In conclusion, while executive orders are a powerful tool for the president to manage the operations of the federal government, they are subject to constitutional checks and balances and cannot override federal laws and statutes. The president must ensure that their executive orders are rooted in their constitutional powers or enacted by Congress to avoid judicial intervention and maintain the rule of law.

Courts can be called on to review the lawfulness of an executive order

The United States Constitution does not explicitly permit the use of executive orders. However, Article II of the US Constitution vests the president with executive power, including the obligation to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". Executive orders, therefore, must be rooted in Article II of the Constitution or enacted by Congress in statutes.

The courts must step in to safeguard the rule of law if the president orders the government to take actions that are not authorized by the Constitution or are in violation of federal laws. For instance, in Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (1964), the plaintiff alleged a violation of an executive order prohibiting racial discrimination by government contractors. The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit noted that the Constitution was meant to impose limits on governmental power.

The courts may also be called on to provide justice if the president exceeds their lawful authority or violates the Constitution. Legal advocacy groups have challenged the legal limits of executive orders, and federal judges have temporarily blocked certain plans. For example, a federal judge temporarily blocked former President Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship.

In summary, courts play a crucial role in reviewing the lawfulness of executive orders and ensuring that they do not violate the Constitution or federal laws. They safeguard the separation of powers and uphold the rule of law.

Frequently asked questions