Slavery's Role In The Constitution: Founders' Intent

did the founders think slavery was important in the constitution

The question of whether the Founding Fathers considered slavery to be important in the Constitution is a complex and controversial one. On the one hand, many of the Founding Fathers, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, owned slaves, and the Constitution included several clauses that protected slavery, such as the Three-Fifths Clause and the Fugitive Slave Clause. The Founding Fathers also knew that slavery violated the principles of liberty and equality in the Declaration of Independence. However, they were also aware of the immorality of slavery and the need for action, and some, like Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, became members of anti-slavery societies. Ultimately, the Founding Fathers had to navigate the difficult issue of slavery while also trying to maintain the unity of the new United States, and they believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government.

cycivic

The Founders' beliefs about slavery

The issue of slavery posed a difficult question for the Founding Fathers. The institution of slavery was protected by law in all 13 American colonies when they declared independence from Great Britain in 1776. The Founding Fathers were born into a slaveholding society where the morality of owning slaves was rarely questioned. However, they also acknowledged that slavery violated the core American Revolutionary ideal of liberty. Many of the Founding Fathers expressed a desire to see the institution gradually abolished.

During the era of the Articles of Confederation (1781-1789), the Founders, with the exception of those from South Carolina and Georgia, demonstrated their aversion to slavery by prohibiting the importation of foreign slaves to individual states. They also supported a proposal by Thomas Jefferson to ban slavery in the Northwest Territory. However, these policies served the interests of Virginia and Maryland slaveholders, who could then sell their surplus slaves southward and westward at higher prices. The ban on slavery in the Northwest also tacitly legitimised the expansion of slavery in the Southwest.

During the Constitutional Convention in 1787, about 25 out of 55 delegates owned slaves. Many of the framers harbored moral qualms about slavery. Some, including Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, became members of anti-slavery societies. On August 21, 1787, a bitter debate broke out over a South Carolina proposal to prohibit the federal government from regulating the Atlantic slave trade. Luther Martin of Maryland, a slaveholder, argued that the slave trade should be subject to federal regulation and was inconsistent with American revolutionary ideals. John Rutledge of South Carolina forcefully disagreed, stating that religion and humanity had nothing to do with the question. He insisted that if the regulation of the slave trade was left to the states, the southernmost states "shall not be parties to the union."

The final Constitution included several clauses related to slavery, such as the Three-Fifths Clause, which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation, giving the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. The Constitution also included a fugitive slave clause requiring the return of runaway slaves to their owners and prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years. While the framers of the Constitution believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government, they also knew that slavery violated the principles of the Declaration of Independence.

cycivic

The Constitution's impact on slavery

The US Constitution, drafted in 1787, had a complex relationship with slavery. While the word "slavery" is not explicitly mentioned in the document, several clauses and compromises within the Constitution had a significant impact on the institution of slavery and its future in the United States.

Firstly, the Three-Fifths Clause, also known as the "Importation of Persons Clause," is a key aspect of the Constitution's impact on slavery. This clause, found in Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3, provided that representation in Congress would be based on the population of free persons, excluding untaxed Indigenous people and "three-fifths of all other persons." The "other persons" referred to enslaved African individuals, who comprised around one-third of the Southern states' population. This clause gave Southern states enhanced representation in the House of Representatives and additional votes in the Electoral College.

Another important aspect is the Importation Clause, or Article 1, Section 9, which prohibited the federal government from banning the slave trade for 20 years after the Constitution took effect. This clause was a compromise between the Southern states, where slavery was crucial to the economy, and states moving towards abolition. It was not a protection of slavery but rather a step towards ending the slave trade, as it allowed individual states to prohibit slave imports if they wished.

Additionally, the Fugitive Slave Clause required the return of runaway slaves to their owners, and the Constitution gave the federal government the power to suppress slave rebellions. These provisions protected the institution of slavery and the rights of slaveowners.

The Founding Fathers' views on slavery were varied and influenced by the moral, economic, and political complexities of the time. Many acknowledged that slavery contradicted the core American ideals of liberty and equality. Some, like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton, expressed a desire to see slavery gradually abolished. However, their commitment to private property rights, limited government, and sectional harmony, along with their investment in slave-based agriculture and racial prejudice, hindered their ability to take bolder action.

In conclusion, while the Constitution did not directly address the word "slavery," its various clauses and compromises had a significant impact on the institution. The Constitution sought to balance the need for unity among the states with the moral quandaries surrounding slavery. The Founding Fathers' legacy regarding slavery remains a subject of debate, with some scholars criticising them for not doing enough to abolish it, while others defend their efforts within the context of their time.

cycivic

The role of slave-based agriculture

The Southern states' economies relied heavily on slave labour, especially after the invention of the cotton gin in 1793. This economic reliance on slavery made it politically impossible for the Framers to abolish the institution. The Southern Founders' commitment to maintaining the unity of the new United States led them to resolve sectional tensions over slavery through compromises.

The Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation, gave Southern states more power in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. This compromise also increased the direct federal tax burden on slave-holding states. The Framers of the Constitution believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of Southern delegates for a strong central government.

The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years, ensuring that slavery remained a national issue. The Fugitive Slave Clause required the return of runaway slaves to their owners, and the federal government was given the power to put down slave rebellions. These measures entrenched slavery in the fabric of American governance and contributed to the Civil War.

While the Northern states did not rely on slave labour for their agriculture, their economy was tied to exports from the Southern states. This complex economic relationship between the North and the South further complicated the issue of slave-based agriculture and its role in the Constitution.

cycivic

The Southern states' influence

Southern influence also led to the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause, which required the return of runaway slaves to their owners. Additionally, the Constitution prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years, a concession to Southern delegates in exchange for removing a clause that would have restricted the national government's power to enact laws requiring goods to be shipped on American vessels. This compromise benefited northeastern shipbuilders and sailors while temporarily strengthening slavery.

The Southern states' power was further solidified by their investment in slave-based staple agriculture and deep-seated racial prejudice, which created obstacles to emancipation. The Founders' commitment to maintaining the unity of the new United States also played a role, as they diffused sectional tensions over slavery to prevent conflict between the North and the South. This resulted in a series of constitutional clauses that acknowledged regional differences over slavery while requiring compromises from all sections of the country.

cycivic

The Founders' legacy on slavery

The legacy of the Founding Fathers with regard to slavery is a complex and controversial issue. The institution of slavery was deeply rooted in the American colonies, and the Founding Fathers were born into a slaveholding society where the morality of owning slaves was rarely questioned. While many of them acknowledged that slavery violated the core American Revolutionary ideal of liberty, they struggled to navigate the issue due to their commitment to private property rights, limited government, and sectional tensions.

During the era of the Articles of Confederation (1781-1789), the Founders exhibited an aversion to slavery by prohibiting the importation of foreign slaves to individual states and supporting a proposal to ban slavery in the Northwest Territory. However, these policies had limitations and served the interests of slaveholders in certain states. Despite initial disagreements over slavery at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Founders prioritized maintaining unity and diffusing regional tensions over slavery.

The Constitution, drafted in 1787, did not explicitly mention the word "slavery" but included several clauses that addressed the issue. The Three-Fifths Clause, for instance, granted slave-holding states enhanced representation in the House of Representatives by counting three-fifths of their slave population. This clause also increased the direct federal tax burden on these states. Additionally, the Constitution included a fugitive slave clause, requiring the return of runaway slaves to their owners, and prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years.

The Founders' intentions regarding slavery have been the subject of debate. Some scholars portray them as racists who sought to protect slavery, while others argue that they knew slavery was immoral and recognized its contradiction with the Declaration of Independence's promise of equality. The Founding Fathers, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, expressed a desire to see the gradual abolition of slavery. However, they faced the challenge of unifying a nation deeply divided over the issue.

In conclusion, the legacy of the Founding Fathers on slavery is complex. While they may have had misgivings about the institution, they were constrained by the political and economic realities of their time. Their primary goal was to unify the nation, and they believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. The Constitution, therefore, reflected a compromise between their ideals and the practical considerations of the time.

Frequently asked questions

The Founding Fathers were born into a slaveholding society where the morality of owning slaves was rarely questioned. While many acknowledged that slavery violated the core American Revolutionary ideal of liberty, their simultaneous commitment to private property rights, principles of limited government, and intersectional harmony prevented them from taking a bold stance against slavery. Some of the Founding Fathers, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, owned numerous slaves, while others, such as Benjamin Franklin, owned a few. Still, others married into large slave-owning families, such as Alexander Hamilton. Despite this, all of them expressed a desire to see the institution gradually abolished.

The Constitution included several provisions that protected slavery and gave power to the slaveholding states. The Three-Fifths Clause granted slaveholding states the right to count three-fifths of their slave population when determining the number of a state's representatives in Congress, thereby enhancing Southern power in the House of Representatives. The Constitution also included a fugitive slave clause, which required the return of runaway slaves to their owners, and prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years.

The Founding Fathers faced a difficult choice regarding slavery. They knew that slavery was immoral and violated the principles of liberty and equality in the Declaration of Independence. However, they prioritized unity and avoiding war over abolishing slavery. They believed that a Constitution curbing slavery would not unify the country and might even lead to perpetual warfare. Additionally, the elite in some states, such as South Carolina and Georgia, were strongly opposed to abolishing slavery and threatened to not join the Union if it was banned.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment