How Anti-Federalists Influenced Massachusetts' Constitution Ratification

Massachusetts was one of the large and powerful states where Anti-Federalists were mounting an effective opposition to the ratification of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists feared that the Constitution would lead to an over-centralised government and diminish individual rights and liberties. They sought to amend the Constitution, particularly with a Bill of Rights, as a condition before ratification. When efforts to ratify the Constitution encountered serious opposition in Massachusetts, two noted Anti-Federalists, John Hancock and Samuel Adams, helped negotiate a compromise. The Federalists agreed to support the proposed amendments, specifically a Bill of Rights. Following this compromise, Massachusetts voted to ratify the Constitution on 6 February 1788.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Anti-Federalist: An Abridgment of The Complete Anti-Federalist

$32.99

The Contest Over the Ratification of the Federal Constitution in the State of Massachusetts

$2.99 $11.85

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Mapping the Constitution: The Cartographic History of the Ratification of the Constitution

$25.07 $40

The Massachusetts Compromise

The Federalists insisted that states had to accept or reject the document as written. When efforts to ratify the Constitution encountered serious opposition in Massachusetts, two noted Anti-Federalists, John Hancock and Samuel Adams, helped negotiate a compromise. The Federalists agreed to support the proposed amendments, specifically a Bill of Rights. Following this compromise, Massachusetts voted to ratify the Constitution on 6 February 1788. Five states subsequently voted for ratification, four of which followed the Massachusetts model of recommending amendments along with their ratification.

The Bill of Rights

In Massachusetts, the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was particularly intense. Two prominent Anti-Federalists, John Hancock and Samuel Adams, played a key role in negotiating a compromise. The Federalists agreed to support the proposed amendments, specifically the Bill of Rights, in exchange for the Anti-Federalists' support for ratification. This compromise, known as the Massachusetts Compromise, helped secure enough backing for the Constitution's ratification.

The Massachusetts Compromise set a precedent for other states, with four out of the next five states that voted for ratification following the Massachusetts model of recommending amendments alongside their ratification. The adoption of the Bill of Rights was a significant outcome of this contentious period in American history, ensuring that the rights and liberties of individuals were protected under the new Constitution.

The Federalists' stance

The Federalists' position on the Constitution was in contrast to that of the Anti-Federalists, who feared that the Constitution would lead to an over-centralized government and diminish individual rights and liberties. The Anti-Federalists sought to amend the Constitution before ratification, particularly with a Bill of Rights, to protect the rights and privileges of American citizens. They argued that the Constitution's consolidation of power would lead to a loss of individual freedoms.

The Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. In Massachusetts, the arguments between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists became so heated that they erupted in a physical brawl between Elbridge Gerry and Francis Dana. Sensing that Anti-Federalist sentiment would sink ratification efforts, James Madison reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach.

The Massachusetts Compromise, as it came to be known, was a solution reached in the controversy between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the ratification of the Constitution. The compromise helped ensure the Constitution's ratification and led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists agreed to support ratification, with the understanding that they would put forth recommendations for amendments should the document go into effect. Following this compromise, Massachusetts voted to ratify the Constitution on February 6, 1788. Five states subsequently voted for ratification, four of which followed the Massachusetts model of recommending amendments along with their ratification.

Explore related products

Original Intentions: On the Making and Ratification of the United States Constitution

$32.88

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

$17.1 $19.99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$61.11 $85

The Framing and Ratification of the Constitution

$69.99

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$27.9 $42.5

The Anti-Federalists' stance

The Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. When efforts to ratify the Constitution encountered serious opposition in Massachusetts, two noted anti-Federalists, John Hancock and Samuel Adams, helped negotiate a compromise. The Federalists agreed to support the proposed amendments, specifically a bill of rights. Following this compromise, Massachusetts voted to ratify the Constitution on February 6, 1788.

The Three Dissenters

The Federalists, however, insisted that the states had to accept or reject the document as it was. When the Federalists encountered serious opposition in Massachusetts, two noted Anti-Federalists, John Hancock and Samuel Adams, helped negotiate a compromise. This compromise, known as the Massachusetts Compromise, helped gather enough support for the Constitution to ensure its ratification. The Federalists agreed to support the proposed amendments, including a Bill of Rights. In return, the Anti-Federalists agreed to support ratification, with the understanding that they would put forth recommendations for amendments. Following this compromise, Massachusetts voted to ratify the Constitution on February 6, 1788.

Frequently asked questions