Anti-Federalists: Constitution Ratification Supporters Or Detractors?

The Anti-Federalists were opposed to the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution. They were concerned that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties. Their opposition was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights, which was designed to protect Americans' civil liberties. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Documents of Revolution: Common Sense, The Complete Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation, The Articles of Confederation, The U. S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

$26.99 $26.99

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Dispute: The Original Arguments For Each

$0.99 $25.13

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties. They believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. In Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, Anti-Federalists made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

The arguments of the Anti-Federalists influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. As a response to the Anti-Federalists’ demands of a bill of rights to guarantee specific liberties, the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped assuage its critics and ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

The Anti-Federalists' fear of a powerful national government

The Anti-Federalists did not support the ratification of the Constitution. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties. They wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, with the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and accountability by officeholders to popular majorities.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. They argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, taking power away from state and local governments. They wanted a Bill of Rights to guarantee specific liberties.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. In Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, they made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach. This helped to ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

The Anti-Federalists' support for strong state governments

The Anti-Federalists did not support the ratification of the Constitution. They were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. They favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists' arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. As a response to their demands, the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped assuage its critics and ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

Explore related products

Mapping the Constitution: The Cartographic History of the Ratification of the Constitution

$25.07 $40

Original Intentions: On the Making and Ratification of the United States Constitution

$32.88

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

$17.1 $19.99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$79.05 $85

The Framing and Ratification of the Constitution

$69.99

The Anti-Federalists' influence on the formation of the Bill of Rights

The Anti-Federalists were opposed to the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution. They argued that it gave too much power to the federal government, threatening individual liberties. They wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, with the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and accountability by officeholders to popular majorities.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights. Their demands for a bill of rights to guarantee specific liberties influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights, which was adopted as the First Amendment and nine other amendments to the Constitution. In Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, Anti-Federalists made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach. The Bill of Rights, fashioned after the English Bill of Rights and George Mason's Virginia Declaration of Rights, is a list of ten constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. The Tenth Amendment, in particular, reinforced the reservation of powers to the states or the people.

The Anti-Federalists' role in the adoption of the First Amendment

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution, arguing that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties. They wanted a bill of rights to guarantee specific liberties. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. In Massachusetts, Virginia and New York, three crucial states, Anti-Federalists made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach. The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens.

The Anti-Federalists failed to prevent the adoption of the Constitution, but their efforts were not entirely in vain. Although many Federalists initially argued against the necessity of a bill of rights, they promised to add amendments to it specifically protecting individual liberties. Upon ratification, James Madison introduced twelve amendments during the First Congress in 1789. The states ratified ten of these, which took effect in 1791 and are known today collectively as the Bill of Rights.

Frequently asked questions