Federalists And The Constitution: Support And Ratification

The Federalists were a group of men led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay who supported the ratification of the US Constitution. They believed that the Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. The Federalists also believed that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

Explore related products

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$79.05 $85

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788 ( Complete )

$15

The Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government

Federalists supported the ratification of the US Constitution because they believed it provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government. The Constitution was written to remedy the weaknesses of the previous government and provide the US with a better, more representative form of government. Federalists, led by men such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued that the Constitution was the best way to balance the need for a strong central government with the need to prevent that government from becoming too powerful.

The Constitution tried to balance power between the small and large states by having a two-house legislature, and between the central and state governments. It also split power between the three branches of government. Federalists believed that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

The Federalists prevailed in the ratification debate, and the US Constitution was ratified in 1788, going into effect in 1789. George Washington, though against political parties and divisions, fully supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, feared that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights and local governments. They believed that state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms.

The Constitution would unify the nation

Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution because they believed it would unify the nation. Led by men such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, Federalists argued that the Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government. They believed that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. This would ensure that the government was strong enough to unify the nation, but not so strong that it could threaten the rights of states and citizens.

The Federalists' view was that the Constitution was the best way to balance the need for a strong central government with the need to protect against that government becoming too powerful. They believed that the Constitution's three branches of government, with power split between them, would achieve this balance. This was in contrast to the Anti-Federalists, who feared that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights and the freedoms of citizens.

The Federalists' belief that the Constitution would unify the nation was tied to their view that it would enable the creation of a strong central government capable of protecting against foreign threats and managing domestic affairs. They argued that the Constitution provided a framework for a more representative form of government that would better serve the nation. This was in contrast to the Anti-Federalists' view that a strong federal government would favour the rich over ordinary citizens.

The Federalists' arguments ultimately prevailed, and the US Constitution was ratified in 1788, going into effect in 1789.

The Constitution would protect against foreign threats

The Federalists, led by men such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, believed that the US Constitution would provide a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. They argued that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

The Federalists believed that the Constitution was the best way to balance the need for a strong central government with the need to prevent that government from becoming too powerful. They thought that the Constitution's elaborate 'check and balance' system would strengthen the central government while making sure that there were always forces in place to keep it from becoming too powerful.

The Federalists also believed that the Constitution would help to unify the nation. They argued that it provided a framework for a strong, effective central government that could manage domestic affairs and protect against foreign threats. The Constitution tried to balance power between the small and large states by having a two-house legislature and between the central and state governments.

The Federalists' arguments ultimately prevailed, and the US Constitution was ratified in 1788, going into effect in 1789.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$39 $42.5

The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Favour of the New Constitution

$17.99 $17.99

An Anti-Federalist Constitution: The Development of Dissent in the Ratification Debates (American Political Thought)

$27.3 $42.99

The Federalist

$24.28 $30

The Framework of the Federalist: Visualizing the Structure of the Argumentation

$20

The Constitution would manage domestic affairs

Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution because they believed it was the best way to balance the need for a strong central government with the need to prevent that government from becoming too powerful. Led by men such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, Federalists argued that the Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs.

The Constitution tried to balance power between the small and large states by having a two-house legislature. It also tried to balance power between the central and state governments, and it split power between the three branches of government. Federalists believed that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

The Federalists prevailed, and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788 and went into effect in 1789. However, Anti-Federalists, who were particularly strong in New England, feared that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights. They believed that state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms. Some Anti-Federalists, like Patrick Henry, were wealthy, but most distrusted the elite and believed a strong federal government would favour the rich over those of "the middling sort".

The Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful

Federalists supported the ratification of the US Constitution because they believed it was the best way to balance the need for a strong central government with the need to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

The Federalists, led by men such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued that the Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. They believed that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

The US Constitution was written to remedy the weaknesses of the previous form of government and provide the US with a better, more representative form of government. It tried to balance power between the small and large states by having a two-house legislature, and between the central and state governments. It also split power between three branches of government: the executive, legislative, and judicial. This elaborate 'check and balance' system was intended to strengthen the central government while making sure that there were always forces in place to keep it from becoming too powerful.

Support for the Federalists was especially strong in New England. Opponents of ratification were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists feared the power of the national government and believed that state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms. They argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments.

Frequently asked questions