Russia's Monarchy: A Constitutional Past?

Russia has had a complex political history, with various forms of governance throughout the centuries. Before the enactment of the 1906 constitution, the Russian Empire was an absolute monarchy ruled by an autocratic emperor, commonly referred to as the Tsar. While there were attempts to introduce constitutional monarchy, such as the proposal by Count Sergei Witte, the Tsar's Minister of Finance, these efforts were often resisted by the ruling monarchs. The Russian Revolution of 1917 ultimately led to the abolition of the monarchy, marking a significant shift in the country's political system. Today, Russia is a federal semi-presidential republic, and while there is some support for the idea, the restoration of the monarchy remains a hypothetical concept.

Explore related products

Russian Monarchy: Eighteenth-Century Rulers and Writers in Political Dialogue (NIU Series in Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies)

$53.95

Russian Monarchy: Representation and Rule (Imperial Russia)

$117.45 $129

The Papal Monarchy: The Western Church from 1050 to 1250 (Oxford History of the Christian Church)

$83.41 $120

Comrade Kerensky (New Russian Thought)

$20 $24.95

Readings in Russian Civilization: Vol. III, Soviet Russia, 1917-1963

$37.88 $41

Modernizing Europe’s Imperial Monarchies: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia in the Nineteenth Century (Palgrave Studies in Modern Monarchy)

$139.72 $159.99

The Russian Empire was an absolute monarchy

The Russian Empire, which spanned most of northern Eurasia, was an absolute monarchy ruled by an autocratic emperor commonly referred to as the "Tsar". The Russian monarchy was theoretically unlimited, with no legal or economic safeguards against the arbitrary power of the Tsar. The precise regulations by which the Tsar exercised his imperial prerogatives were first codified in 1832, with the issuance of the Set of Laws of the Russian Empire, penned by Mikhail Speransky. These laws could be altered or repealed by the emperor.

The Tsar's authority was, in practice, constrained by the sheer size of the country, administrative inadequacies, and a generally non-modern conception of politics. As a result, the vast majority of the empire's inhabitants rarely felt the heavy hand of the state, which limited its authority to maintaining order and collecting taxes. The Tsar's power was also subject to two constraints: they and their spouses were required to profess the Russian Orthodox faith, and they had to obey the laws of succession laid down by Emperor Paul I.

The Russian Empire was founded in November 1721 when the Russian Senate conferred the title of emperor upon Peter I. Peter transformed the tsardom into an empire, fought numerous wars, and led a cultural revolution that introduced a modern, scientific, rationalist, and Western-oriented system. The groundwork of the Russian Empire was laid by Ivan III, who expanded his domain, established a centralized Russian national state, and secured independence against the Tatars.

The last Tsar, Nicholas II, was committed to maintaining absolute monarchy even in the face of increasing calls for reform, peasant unrest, and the rise of revolutionary organizations. When reforms became inevitable, Nicholas insisted on retaining as much of his previous authority as possible. For example, when confronted with demands for the establishment of a national legislative assembly, he only offered a broadening of the local councils' authority, insurance for factory workers, and the abolition of censorship. Nicholas II ultimately authorized the creation of a national parliament, the State Duma, after the 1905 Revolution, but he still retained absolute political power.

The 1906 Constitution provided for a bicameral parliament

The Russian Constitution of 1906 was a major revision of the 1832 Fundamental Laws of the Russian Empire. It transformed the country from an absolute monarchy into a constitutional monarchy, with the emperor agreeing to share his power with a parliament. This legislature was composed of an upper house, the State Council, and a lower house, the State Duma.

The upper house, or State Council, was made up of members appointed by the Tsar and those elected by various governmental, clerical, and commercial interests. The lower house, or State Duma, was chosen by different classes of the Russian people through a complex scheme of indirect elections. The system was weighted to ensure the ultimate preponderance of the propertied classes.

While the Duma held the power of legislation and the right to question the Tsar's ministers, it did not have control over their appointment or dismissal, which was reserved for the monarch. The Tsar also retained an absolute veto over legislation and the right to dismiss the Duma at any time, for any reason. The emperor could also issue decrees during the Duma's absence, but these would lose their validity if not approved by the new parliament within two months.

The first Russian parliament was short-lived, lasting just over ten years. The Duma played a leading role in bringing about the Tsar's abdication during the Russian Revolution of 1917, which led to the abolition of the monarchy and the ascent of the Russian Provisional Government under Kerensky.

The Tsar resisted calls for a constitutional monarchy

The Tsar, Nicholas II, resisted calls for a constitutional monarchy in Russia. Prior to the enactment of the 1906 Russian Constitution, the Russian Empire had been an absolute monarchy ruled by an autocratic emperor, commonly referred to as the Tsar. While there were some constraints on the Tsar's power, such as the requirement to profess the Russian Orthodox faith and obey the laws of succession, the Tsar's power was otherwise virtually limitless.

Nicholas II was committed to maintaining this absolute monarchy, even in the face of increasing calls for reform, peasant unrest, and the rise of revolutionary organizations within his empire. He rejected any ideas of constitutional monarchy until after the 1905 Revolution and the adoption of a constitution in 1906. Even then, he resisted granting any meaningful reforms and did his best to maintain as much of his personal power as possible. For instance, faced with demands from provincial dumas for a national legislative assembly, Nicholas offered only minor concessions such as broadening the local councils' authority and abolishing censorship.

The Tsar's resistance to calls for a constitutional monarchy was due to his belief that only an autocratic monarchy could sustain effective government and avoid social revolution and the disintegration of the multinational empire. In his mind, Russia was his to rule alone. However, his resistance to reform ultimately led to his downfall. With the outbreak of the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Duma took a leading role in bringing about the Tsar's abdication, which led to the abolition of the monarchy and the ascent to power of the Russian Provisional Government.

The Tsar's resistance to calls for a constitutional monarchy was not unique in Russian history. Following the assassination of Alexander I, his son, Alexander III, insisted on preserving the autocracy intact. Additionally, after the Napoleonic Wars, a group of liberal nobles and army officers led the Decembrist revolt in 1825, seeking to install Nicholas' brother Constantine as a constitutional monarch. This revolt was easily crushed, and Nicholas I turned away from modernization and championing the doctrine of Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality.

Explore related products

Rasputin and the Russian Revolution

$19.99

The Winter Palace and the People: Staging and Consuming Russia's Monarchy, 1754–1917 (NIU Series in Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies)

$29.99 $44.95

The Afterlife of Austria-Hungary: The Image of the Habsburg Monarchy in Interwar Europe (Russian and East European Studies, 233)

$35.88 $55

Nicholas and Alexandra: The Classic Account of the Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

$14.99 $22

Russian Splendor: Sumptuous Fashions of the Russian Court

$78.27 $100

The Rise of the Russian Empire

$13.99

The Duma led the Tsar's abdication in 1917

Russia was an absolute monarchy ruled by an autocratic emperor, the Tsar, prior to the enactment of the 1906 constitution. The Tsar's power was virtually limitless, and he could alter or repeal laws as he saw fit.

The Russian Constitution of 1906 provided for a bicameral Russian parliament, consisting of an upper house, the State Council, and a lower house, the State Duma. The Duma was a legislative body with the power to question the Tsar's ministers, but it could not control their appointment or dismissal, as that was reserved for the monarch. The Duma also did not have the power to alter the constitution, except upon the emperor's initiative.

The Tsar Nicholas II, who succeeded his father in 1894, was committed to maintaining absolute monarchy. However, he was a poor leader, and his refusal to accept any reduction in his power led to worsening relations with the government and increased hardship for civilians and soldiers. In 1915, Nicholas closed the Duma, which alienated many liberals.

The February Revolution of 1917 was sparked by economic problems, Russia's disastrous involvement in World War One, and social unrest. On 22 February 1917, metal workers in Petrograd went on strike, and they were joined by female protesters marching against food rationing. The protests grew, and the Tsar ordered the commander of the Petrograd garrison to suppress the rioting by force. However, the troops mutinied and joined the protesters. Having lost the support of the army, the Tsar abdicated on 2 March 1917, bringing an end to the Tsarist regime and nearly 500 years of autocratic rule in Russia.

The Duma played a crucial role in the Tsar's abdication by providing a center of opposition to the Tsar and his government. The Duma continued to gather in private sessions even after it was officially dissolved by the Tsar. On 27 February 1917, its members formed the Temporary Committee of the State Duma, which became the de facto supreme authority in the country. Thus, the Duma led the charge in bringing about the Tsar's abdication and the subsequent abolition of the monarchy in Russia.

Support for the restoration of constitutional monarchy

Russia has a long history of monarchy, with the first Russian monarch being crowned in 1547. The Russian Empire, which began in 1721, was an absolute monarchy ruled by an autocratic emperor commonly referred to as the Tsar. However, in the late 19th century, a mass revolutionary movement spread across Russia, and the monarchy came to symbolize everything retrograde and unjust. In 1905, under pressure, Tsar Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto, promising basic civil rights and an elected parliament called the Duma, thus creating a constitutional monarchy. However, Nicholas II continued to resist sharing power, and with the outbreak of the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Duma took a leading role in bringing about the Tsar's abdication, which led to the abolition of the monarchy.

Today, as Russians consider the country's possible development paths, some argue for the restoration of the constitutional monarchy as a way to restore Russia's spiritual and moral values and its national character. The Grand Duchess of the Imperial House has stated that she would be ready to serve if the Russian people decided to restore the monarchy through a free and open vote. However, she believes that Russia is not currently ready for such a restoration. According to Andrey Zubov of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations and St. John's Russian Orthodox University, support for the monarchy is stronger among Russians who emigrated. He notes that the Soviet period saw the emergence of a new "Soviet man" with a negative perception of the idea of monarchy, and this perception has persisted into post-communist Russia.

Zubov argues that the monarchy's main function is to ensure a continuation of symbolic supreme power and national historical traditions. He points out that many countries today, including several European monarchies, still have a monarchy as an important part of their national identity. In the context of a restored Russian monarchy, Vladimir Karpets of the Higher School of Economics has suggested that the monarch could be a descendant of the Romanov House or the Rurikovich House, with the ideal candidate having ancestry from both dynasties.

While there is no unanimous support for a specific candidate for the Russian throne, the discussion of restoring the constitutional monarchy in Russia remains a topic of interest, particularly among those who see it as a way to unite the country around its ancient traditions and values.

Frequently asked questions