Federalists' Push For Constitution Ratification Explained

The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution to ensure a strong national government, which would diminish the independence of the states. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison published 85 essays in The Federalist, referred to as the Federalist Papers, urging support for the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalists were better organised than the Anti-Federalists and had strong support in the press of the day. To ensure adoption of the Constitution, the Federalists promised to add amendments specifically protecting individual liberties.

Explore related products

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$61.11 $85

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788 ( Complete )

$15

The Federalists wanted to create a strong national government

The Federalists ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates. They wanted to create a strong national government to ensure the adoption of the Constitution. They promised to add amendments specifically protecting individual liberties. James Madison, a Federalist at the time and the primary architect of the Constitution, introduced draft proposals of what would become the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution and advocated for their passage.

They wanted to diminish the independence of the states

The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution to diminish the independence of the states. They were advocates of a strong national government, which would have more authority over the states. The Federalists were opposed by the Anti-Federalists, who believed that the Constitution would lead to a loss of individual liberties and an erosion of state sovereignty. They wanted a more decentralised form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states.

The Federalists, including James Madison, agreed to support a bill of rights to ensure the Constitution was ratified. Madison introduced proposals that were incorporated into 12 amendments by Congress in 1789. States ratified 10 of these amendments, now designated as the Bill of Rights, in 1791. The first of these amendments contains guarantees of freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceable assembly, and petition.

The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays published by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, urged support for the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalists were better organised than the Anti-Federalists and had strong support in the press, ultimately prevailing in state ratification debates.

They wanted to prevent the loss of individual liberties

The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution to prevent the loss of individual liberties. They were advocates of a strong national government, but also wanted to ensure that individual liberties were protected. To this end, they agreed to add amendments to the Constitution that would specifically protect individual liberties.

The Federalists, including James Madison, agreed to support a Bill of Rights to prevent the possibility of a second convention that might undo the work of the first. Madison introduced proposals that were incorporated into 12 amendments by Congress in 1789. States ratified 10 of these amendments, now designated as the Bill of Rights, in 1791. The first of these amendments contains guarantees of freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceable assembly, and petition, and has also been interpreted to protect the right of association.

The Federalists' position was articulated in 85 essays published in *The Federalist*, referred to as the Federalist Papers. These essays urged support for the ratification of the Constitution, while the Anti-Federalists published a series of essays expressing their concerns about creating a strong central government and the lack of a Bill of Rights. The Federalist/Anti-Federalist debates further illustrate the vigor of the rights to freedom of speech and press in the United States, even before the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were adopted.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$27.9 $42.5

The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Favour of the New Constitution

$17.99 $17.99

An Anti-Federalist Constitution: The Development of Dissent in the Ratification Debates (American Political Thought)

$27.3 $42.99

The Federalist

$24.28 $30

The Framework of the Federalist: Visualizing the Structure of the Argumentation

$20

They wanted to avoid the erosion of state sovereignty

The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution to avoid the erosion of state sovereignty. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They advocated for a more decentralised form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states. The Federalists ultimately agreed to support a bill of rights to head off the possibility of a second convention that might undo the work of the first. James Madison, a Federalist at the time and the primary architect of the Constitution, introduced draft proposals of what would become the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution and advocated for their passage. In particular, the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution reinforced the reservation of the powers to the states or the people.

They wanted to prevent the rise of tyranny

The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution to prevent the rise of tyranny. They believed that a strong national government was necessary to protect individual liberties and prevent the erosion of state sovereignty. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison published 85 essays in *The Federalist*, known as the Federalist Papers, urging support for the ratification of the Constitution. They argued that a strong central government was needed to protect individual rights and ensure a united and stable nation.

The Federalists also recognised the importance of freedom of speech and press, even before the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were adopted. They understood that a strong national government could potentially lead to tyranny if individual liberties were not protected. To address this concern, they promised to add amendments specifically protecting individual liberties, such as freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceable assembly, and petition.

The Federalist Papers were a response to the Anti-Federalists, who were against the ratification of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They advocated for a more decentralised form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states.

The Federalists ultimately prevailed in the state ratification debates, and their efforts led to the successful ratification of the Constitution. The compromise struck between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists resulted in the addition of a Bill of Rights, which guaranteed specific liberties and prevented the potential for tyranny.

Frequently asked questions