Challenges Of Drafting A National Constitution

why was it difficult to write a national constitution

The United States Constitution, the oldest and longest-standing written and codified national constitution, has been amended 27 times since it became operational in 1789. The drafting of the Constitution, often referred to as its framing, was completed at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The convention was called to revise the Articles of Confederation, which had proven ineffective in meeting the young nation's needs. The Articles of Confederation gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. The states' disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the young country apart. The convention soon abandoned the Articles, drafting a new Constitution with a much stronger national government. The Anti-Federalists fought hard against the Constitution because it created a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown, and it lacked a bill of rights. The ratification campaign was challenging, with only 6 of 13 states initially reporting a pro-Constitution majority.

Characteristics Values
Lack of enforcement powers The Articles of Confederation gave Congress the power to make rules and request funds from states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money
Ineffective in meeting the young nation's needs The Articles of Confederation were highly ineffective in meeting the young nation's needs, leading to delegates considering measures to replace them
Weak central government The central government was designed to be very weak, with few powers beyond defending the states as a group. It lacked an executive official or judicial branch
Difficulty passing legislation Congress needed 9 out of 13 states to pass any laws, making it challenging to pass legislation affecting all states
States' independence States had the power to operate independently from the central government, even when it wasn't in the nation's best interests
Foreign policy challenges States conducted their own foreign policies, as the central government lacked the power to enforce its authority in this area
Monetary system discrepancies States had their own money systems, making trade between states and other countries difficult due to the lack of a common currency
Inability to settle debts The central government couldn't help settle Revolutionary War-era debts, and the nation faced economic challenges due to a lack of taxation powers and viable trade
Anti-Federalist opposition Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution, arguing that the territory of the 13 states was too extensive for a representative government, and it lacked a bill of rights
Complexity of amendments Amending the Constitution is a complex process, requiring approval from two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate or two-thirds of the states

cycivic

No enforcement powers

The difficulty of writing a national constitution is a complex and challenging task, as evidenced by the creation of the United States Constitution, the oldest and longest-standing written and codified national constitution. One significant challenge was the issue of enforcement powers, or the lack thereof, in the initial attempts at a constitution.

America's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave the Confederation Congress the authority to make rules and request funds from the states. However, it had a critical shortcoming: it lacked enforcement powers. This meant that the Confederation Congress was unable to enforce the rules it established, leading to disputes among the states over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, which threatened to tear the young nation apart.

The lack of enforcement powers in the Articles of Confederation highlighted the need for a stronger central government with the ability to enforce its decisions. This concern led to the convening of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, where delegates from the states worked to create a new constitution. The result was a constitution that established a federal government with three branches: the legislative, consisting of a bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President and subordinate officers; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts.

The separation of powers among these branches provided a system of checks and balances, ensuring that no one branch held all the power. This addressed the issue of enforcement by distributing the authority to enforce laws and regulations across the different branches of government. Each branch had specific responsibilities and limitations, providing a framework for enforcing the rules and regulations established by the government.

The process of amending the constitution was also established to address any shortcomings or changes that needed to be made over time. Amendments to the constitution require a two-step process: proposal and ratification. Proposals can be adopted by either a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress or by a national convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures. Ratification then requires the approval of three-fourths of the states, ensuring that any changes to the constitution reflect the consensus of a significant majority of the country.

cycivic

Lack of trust in government

A lack of trust in the government can make it difficult to write a national constitution. This was evident in the United States, where the founding fathers and citizens had just overthrown a powerful central government. The Anti-Federalists, for instance, opposed the Constitution because it reminded them of the oppressive regime they had just overthrown.

The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, had also failed to establish trust in the government. The Articles gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it lacked enforcement powers, could not regulate commerce, or print money. This led to states' disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, which threatened to tear the young country apart. The central government was weak, with no executive official or judicial branch, and each state had the power to operate independently, even when it was not in the nation's best interests.

The lack of trust in the government was further exacerbated by the states' ability to conduct their foreign policies, as the central government lacked the power to enforce its authority. Additionally, the states had their own money systems, making trade between them and with other countries challenging. The central government also couldn't help settle Revolutionary War-era debts, and the country was in an economic crisis by 1787.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called to address these issues and revise the Articles of Confederation. However, the delegates soon abandoned the Articles and drafted a new Constitution with a much stronger national government. The process of drafting and ratifying the new Constitution was lengthy and contentious, with fierce debates over the structure and powers of the federal government.

cycivic

State legislature reluctance

The founders of the US Constitution bypassed the state legislatures, anticipating that their members would be reluctant to give up power to a national government. Instead, they called for special ratifying conventions in each state. This reluctance was due to the fact that the state legislatures had become accustomed to operating independently from the central government, and were hesitant to cede power to a new, stronger central government.

The Articles of Confederation, which was America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. This led to disputes between the states over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, which threatened to tear the young country apart. The states also had their own money systems, conducted their own foreign policies, and were unable to settle Revolutionary War-era debts, further contributing to the chaos.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called to revise the Articles of Confederation, but the delegates soon abandoned those articles and drafted a new Constitution with a much stronger national government. This new Constitution gave the federal government the power to regulate commerce, and it established a single national currency. It also created a judicial branch and an executive official, which provided a mechanism for enforcing the laws and policies of the central government.

The founders of the US Constitution recognized that the state legislatures would be reluctant to give up their power, and so they bypassed them and took their proposal directly to the people, holding special ratifying conventions in each state. This strategy was successful, and the new Constitution was ratified by 11 states, ushering in a new form of government for the United States.

cycivic

Anti-Federalist opposition

The Anti-Federalists were a loose political coalition of popular politicians, small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers who opposed the strong central government envisioned in the U.S. Constitution of 1787. They believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, threatening individual liberties due to the absence of a bill of rights. They also feared the authority of a single national government, resembling the one they had just overthrown, and believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights, which protects Americans' civil liberties. Their agitation led to the addition of the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, which offer specific protections of individual liberty and justice and place restrictions on the powers of the government within the U.S. states.

The Anti-Federalists published a series of articles and delivered numerous speeches against the ratification of the Constitution, known as the Anti-Federalist Papers. They also favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists' views on the new Constitution for the United States varied, but they generally agreed on a few key points. Firstly, they believed that the new Constitution gave too much power to Congress at the expense of the states. Secondly, they argued that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that this would lead to courts of intrigue in the nation's capital. Finally, they believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments rather than a federal one.

cycivic

Weak central government

A weak central government can be a significant challenge when drafting a national constitution. This issue can manifest in several ways and have far-reaching implications for the country's stability, effectiveness, and ability to serve its citizens.

One key challenge arising from a weak central government is a lack of coordination and coherence in policy implementation. With weak central authority, various ministries, agencies, and levels of government may struggle to work together effectively. This can result in duplication of efforts, conflicting policies, and a lack of cohesive strategy, ultimately hindering the country's ability to address complex issues and achieve long-term goals.

Another consequence is the potential for power struggles and ineffectiveness within the government itself. Weak central authority can lead to individual ministries or agencies acting in their self-interest, rather than for the greater good of the nation. This can cause infighting, power grabs, and political posturing, distracting from the important work of governing and developing effective policies. Additionally, a weak central government may struggle to make timely and decisive decisions, especially in crises, further undermining its effectiveness.

A weak central government can also impact the country's ability to provide public goods and services efficiently and equitably. This includes essential services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure development, and social safety nets. Without strong central coordination and resource allocation, some regions or demographics may be systematically underserved, exacerbating inequality and social tensions.

Furthermore, a weak central government can hinder a country's economic development and stability. Inconsistent regulatory frameworks, unclear property rights, and unpredictable policy changes can deter foreign investment and hamper domestic business growth. The government may also struggle to manage the economy effectively, potentially leading to higher unemployment, inflation, or economic instability.

Finally, a weak central government can undermine national security and the rule of law. The government may struggle to maintain control over its territory, effectively combat criminal or extremist activities, or ensure a consistent application of justice. This can create an environment where citizens feel unsafe, and their rights are not adequately protected, ultimately eroding trust in the government and threatening the stability of the nation.

Addressing a weak central government requires careful constitutional design, including clear delineation of powers, effective checks and balances, and mechanisms to promote coordination and coherence across various levels and branches of government.

Frequently asked questions

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment