Compromise: The Constitution's Foundation

The creation of the U.S. Constitution was a long and complex process that required several compromises to be made. The delegates, representing 12 of the 13 original states, met in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation, which had been the governing document since the American Revolution. However, they soon realised that a more comprehensive overhaul was needed, and so they set out to create a new constitution. This new constitution would need to address several key issues, including state representation, the slave trade, and the election process. The delegates had to find a way to balance the interests of both large and small states, which led to the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise. This established a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate. Other significant compromises included the Three-Fifths Compromise, which addressed how slaves would be counted for congressional representation, and the Commerce Compromise, which focused on how the federal government should regulate business. These compromises were essential in ensuring that all states had a voice in the federal government and allowed for the creation of the United States Constitution and the federal government as we know it today.

Explore related products

The Taming of Free Speech: America’s Civil Liberties Compromise

$53 $53

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

U.S. Constitution: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$6.46

Constitutional Convention of 1787, The: A Reference Guide (Guides to Historic Events in America)

$15.86 $29.95

Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History (Princeton Studies in American Politics)

$29.95 $29.95

Justice Robert H. Jackson's Unpublished Opinion in Brown v. Board: Conflict, Compromise, and Constitutional Interpretation

$49.99 $54.99

The Great Compromise balanced state and popular sovereignty

The creation of the United States Constitution was a long and arduous process that required many compromises to be made. One of the most important of these was the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, which was proposed by Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth. The Great Compromise was a solution to the debate between large and small states over representation in the legislature, which had caused a stalemate in the development of the Constitution. The compromise created a bicameral legislature, composed of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

The House of Representatives would reflect proportional representation, with seats allocated based on each state's population. This ensured that larger states held greater influence due to their higher number of constituents. On the other hand, the Senate would provide equal representation, with each state, regardless of size or population, being represented by two senators. This assured smaller states that their voices would not be drowned out by those of more populous states. This balance of power between large and small states was further reinforced by the requirement that both houses approve a law for it to be enacted.

The Great Compromise also had a significant impact on the structure of the US government. It established the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, incorporating federalism and dividing governmental power between the states and the federal government. This recognition and balancing of state sovereignty with the need for a cohesive national government cultivated a spirit of federalism and laid the groundwork for future amendments to further refine the federal structure.

The Great Compromise was a pivotal component of the United States Constitution, allowing for the development of the Constitution to continue by uniting the contrasting visions of representation held by large and small states. It demonstrated the wisdom and negotiation skills of the delegates, who successfully created a united and functional government that addressed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation while accommodating the diverse interests of all states.

The Three-Fifths Compromise determined how slaves were counted for representation

The creation of the U.S. Constitution was a long and complex process that required several compromises to be made between the delegates of the Northern and Southern states. One of the most significant compromises was the Three-Fifths Compromise, which determined how slaves were counted for representation in Congress.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. It stated that three-fifths of each state's slave population would be counted as part of the state's total population for the purpose of apportioning the House of Representatives. This gave the Southern states more power in the House relative to the Northern states. The compromise was proposed by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina and was agreed to by nine states with only a brief debate.

The Southern states, with their agricultural economies and reliance on enslaved people, wanted slaves to be counted as full individuals for representation, as this would give them more political power. On the other hand, the Northern states, with their industrialised economies and lesser dependence on slavery, did not want slaves to be counted at all, as they believed that slaves, who had no voting rights, should not be considered in determining representation.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a pragmatic solution to this impasse. While it reduced the representation of the slave states compared to the original proposals, it also improved their position over the Northern states' position. Additionally, the compromise was tied to taxation, so the burden of taxation on the slave states was reduced.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a controversial and tragic aspect of the Constitution, as it perpetuated the institution of slavery and gave slaveholding states enlarged powers. It was part of a larger pattern of compromises made during the creation of the Constitution, such as the Great Compromise or Connecticut Compromise, which balanced state sovereignty with popular sovereignty tied to population. These compromises were necessary to reconcile the differing interests and ideologies of the states and create a unified nation.

The Commerce Compromise allowed federal regulation of trade, excluding the slave trade

The creation of the U.S. Constitution was a long and complex process that required several compromises to balance the interests of the states and the newly formed federal government. One of the key compromises was the Commerce Compromise, which addressed the regulation of trade, including the contentious issue of the slave trade.

The Commerce Compromise was a pivotal agreement that granted Congress the power to regulate commerce, including trade with foreign nations and among the states. This compromise addressed the concerns of the Northern states, which relied on trade and industrial production, and sought federal regulation to protect their economic interests. However, it excluded the slave trade, which was a highly contentious issue that threatened to divide the nation.

The Southern states, with economies heavily dependent on agriculture and slavery, vehemently opposed federal interference in the slave trade. They argued that regulating commerce could lead to the government prohibiting the buying and selling of enslaved people, which was integral to their economic system. The Commerce Compromise struck a delicate balance by empowering the federal government to regulate interstate commerce while explicitly excluding the slave trade from this regulatory framework.

The issue of slavery was deeply divisive, and the delegates grappled with moral and political considerations. Some delegates, such as George Mason of Virginia, advocated for limiting or abolishing slavery, while others from South Carolina and Georgia staunchly opposed any restrictions. The compromise allowed the slave trade to continue, with the understanding that it would officially end in 1808, as stipulated in Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution.

The Commerce Compromise was a pragmatic solution that temporarily eased tensions between the North and the South, allowing for the creation of the Constitution. However, it did not resolve the fundamental moral and ethical questions surrounding slavery, and the issue would later erupt into the Civil War, tearing the nation apart.

Explore related products

The Union As It Is: Constitutional Unionism and Sectional Compromise, 1787-1861

$63.31 $50

Noble Undertaking: Volume 1: The Continental Congress and the American Revolution, 1774–78

$14.21 $39.95

The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking

$18.89 $47.99

Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

$17.1 $19.99

The Constitutional Convention Of 1787: The Drafting Of The U.S. Constitution

$9.99

The Presidents and the Constitution: A Living History

$22.97 $50

The Electoral College was created to elect the president

The creation of the US Constitution was a long and complex process that required a series of compromises to be reached between the various factions involved. One of the most pressing issues concerned the question of representation. The Virginia Plan proposed representation based on each state's population, while the Jersey Plan suggested equal representation for every state. The Great Compromise, or Connecticut Compromise, combined both plans, establishing two chambers in Congress: the Senate, with equal representation for each state, and the House of Representatives, with representation based on population.

Another contentious issue was that of slavery. Delegates from Northern states wanted to end the importation and sale of enslaved people, while Southern states considered slavery vital to their economy and opposed any government interference. A compromise was reached with the three-fifths compromise, where every five enslaved people would be counted as three individuals concerning representation. This compromise also allowed Southern states to count slaves as 3/5 of a person when allocating electors, thereby increasing their voting power.

The issue of elections themselves and who was allowed to vote was also a point of contention. The different state constitutions had varying rules regarding property requirements for white men to vote. The delegates had to devise a solution that satisfied the diverse ideas about who should have the right to vote.

The Electoral College was created as a compromise solution to the question of how the president should be elected. The Founding Fathers established it as part of the Constitution to balance the election of the President by a vote in Congress and the election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. The Electoral College is a group of presidential electors formed every four years to vote for the president and vice president in the presidential election. The number of electors from each state corresponds to the size of its congressional delegation, with each state entitled to a minimum of three electors. The Electoral College process involves selecting electors, who then meet to vote for the president and vice president, with the electoral votes counted by Congress.

The Bill of Rights was a compromise between Federalists and anti-Federalists

The creation of the US Constitution was a long and complex process that required several compromises to be made. One of the most significant compromises was the Bill of Rights, which was a result of negotiations between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the Constitution and wanted a stronger federal government, while the Anti-Federalists opposed it, arguing that it gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states and the people.

The Anti-Federalists believed that a bill of rights was necessary to protect individual liberties and prevent the federal government from overreaching its powers. They argued that the supremacy clause, combined with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses, would allow implied powers that could endanger rights. According to Anti-Federalist Luther Martin, a bill of rights would "give great quiet to the people", serving as a warning when their rights were threatened.

The Federalists, on the other hand, rejected the idea of a bill of rights. They asserted that the state constitutions and the US Constitution were distinct, and that the people retained all rights and powers not granted to the federal government. Federalists also believed that bills of rights had historically been ineffective and that rights were better protected by auxiliary precautions, such as the separation of powers and a representative form of government.

Despite their differences, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise, and the Constitution was adopted. James Madison, a Virginian delegate and strong supporter of the Constitution, played a crucial role in this process. He drafted a series of amendments to be added to the Constitution, known today as the Bill of Rights. These amendments were heavily edited by a committee and eventually presented to Congress for further discussion and editing.

The Bill of Rights gave American citizens codified individual freedoms, such as freedom of speech and the press. Additionally, to address Federalist concerns, Congress included the ability to add amendments to the Constitution, ensuring that no rights were omitted or lost. Thus, the Bill of Rights became a compromise that balanced the interests of both Federalists and Anti-Federalists, protecting individual liberties while also strengthening the federal government.

Frequently asked questions