Us Constitution: Historical Arguments And Their Relevance

The US Constitution is a historical document that has been amended and interpreted over time, reflecting the evolving political, social, and legal landscape of the nation. Its creation was influenced by the political philosophies of the time, with figures like Locke, Hume, and Montesquieu shaping the thinking of the founding fathers. The Constitution was designed to address the inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation, which lacked enforcement powers and struggled to regulate commerce and taxation. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 saw fierce debates over congressional representation, slavery, and the balance of power between the states and the central government. The resulting document, signed by 38 delegates, created a powerful central government with a system of checks and balances. The US Constitution has endured as one of the longest-lived constitutions, with amendments added over time to protect civil liberties and shape the country's future. The interpretation and application of the Constitution continue to be influenced by historical arguments, with lawyers and scholars debating the intentions of the founding fathers and the relevance of historical context in modern times.

Explore related products

We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution

$31.99 $39.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Words That Made Us: America's Constitutional Conversation, 1760-1840

$22.76 $40

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings (Leather-bound Classics)

$13.21 $24.99

The US Constitution's historical context

The US Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, by 38 delegates, with one delegate signing on behalf of an absent delegate, bringing the total number of signatures to 39. The delegates assembled in Philadelphia in May 1787, with the original intention of revising the Articles of Confederation, which had been in force since 1781. However, by mid-June, they had decided to completely redesign the government.

The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, could not regulate commerce, print money, or effectively support a war effort. It also had little power to settle quarrels between states. The states' disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the young country apart.

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention represented wildly different interests and views, and they crafted compromises to accommodate these differences. One of the fiercest arguments was over congressional representation—whether it should be based on population or divided equally among the states. The framers compromised by giving each state one representative for every 30,000 people in the House of Representatives and two representatives in the Senate. They also agreed to count enslaved Africans as three-fifths of a person, temporarily resolving the issue of slavery by agreeing to allow the slave trade to continue until 1808.

The form of the United States government that emerged from these debates was a representative democratic republic with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. A system of checks and balances would help ensure that no one branch gained too much power. The new Constitution also established a powerful central government, addressing the concerns of James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington, who had feared that the young country was on the brink of collapse.

The Constitution was ratified by 9 of the 13 states, bypassing the state legislatures and calling for special ratifying conventions in each state. It stands today as one of the longest-lived and most emulated constitutions in the world. The process of constitutional amendment continued, with James Madison proposing a series of amendments during the first United States Congress. Together, these 10 amendments form the United States Bill of Rights, including protections for freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

The influence of political philosophers

The US Constitution was influenced by the ideas of several political philosophers, including John Locke, Edward Coke, William Blackstone, David Hume, and Montesquieu. These philosophers were frequently referenced by the Founding Fathers, who drew on their ideas to shape the principles and political philosophy of the Constitution.

John Locke, an English philosopher, is particularly notable for his influence on the Constitution. Locke's ideas on personal liberty and political order, as outlined in his "Two Treatises on Government," refuted the divine right of monarchy and established a theory where individual freedom could coexist with political order. Locke's concept of natural rights, which held that men are born free and equal, was a foundational stone of the American Revolution and the subsequent government established by the Constitution.

Another key influence was the Scottish philosopher David Hume, who was admired by Benjamin Franklin. Franklin studied Hume's works while in Edinburgh in 1760, and both men embraced the idea that high-ranking public officials should receive no salary and that the lower class was a better judge of character.

The Founding Fathers were also influenced by the optimism of the European Enlightenment, including the ideas of republicanism and the belief that laws, rather than men, should be the final sanction and that governments should be responsible to the governed. This balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches, checked by an independent judiciary, was a key principle incorporated into the Constitution.

In addition to these philosophical influences, the Framers of the Constitution brought their own coherent philosophy about the ends and means of government. This philosophy, incorporating the doctrines of natural rights, republicanism, and constitutionalism, guided their deliberations and informed their choices among competing solutions to pressing problems.

The inadequacy of the Articles of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation, written in 1777, was the first written constitution of the United States. However, it was inadequate and had several weaknesses that became apparent over time.

One of the main inadequacies was the lack of authority given to Congress. Congress could not levy taxes, regulate trade, or conduct foreign policy without the voluntary agreement of the states. This made it difficult for the new nation to repay its debts from the Revolutionary War. Congress lacked the power to enforce laws, and there was no executive or judiciary to act as a system of checks and balances.

The Articles also gave each state a liberum veto, meaning that all amendments had to be ratified by all thirteen states, and important legislation needed the approval of nine states. This often led to legislative proposals being defeated due to absent delegations. Additionally, Congress could negotiate treaties with foreign powers, but these treaties had to be ratified by the states and Congress lacked the authority to ensure compliance with their stipulations.

The weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation led to the belief that a stronger central government was needed. However, the creation of a centralized government was also met with opposition due to fears of tyranny and insensitivity to local interests. The inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation ultimately led to the creation of new federal laws under The United States Constitution in 1787.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence: Senator Rand Paul, Delegates of The Constitutional Convention

$2.99 $2.99

Born Equal: Remaking America’s Constitution, 1840–1920

$35.05 $40

The People's Guide to the United States Constitution

$13.39 $15.95

American Constitutional History: A Brief Introduction

$36.95 $36.95

Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference)

$17.01 $22

The Constitutional Convention's compromises

The United States Constitution is often referred to as a "bundle of compromises" due to the numerous concessions made by delegates during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The convention was held in Philadelphia, with delegates from all states except Rhode Island in attendance.

One of the key compromises was the Three-Fifths Compromise, which pertained to the issue of slavery and representation. Delegates from the Northern states argued that enslaved people should not count towards representation, while Southern states, whose economies relied heavily on slavery, demanded that they be counted. The compromise dictated that every five enslaved people would count as three individuals for the purpose of representation and taxation. This compromise was a purely mechanical solution to a contentious issue, with little basis in logic or morality.

Another significant compromise was the Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise. This compromise addressed the issue of state representation, with the Virginia Plan advocating representation based on state population, and the New Jersey or Jersey Plan proposing equal representation for each state. The Connecticut Compromise combined both plans, with each state having two senators and representation in the House based on population.

The delegates also compromised on the role of the executive, agreeing to the Electoral College as the method of selecting the president. They also agreed to specific responsibilities for the federal government while delegating other functions to the states. The delegates further compromised on the international slave trade, with Congress gaining the power to ban the trade but only after 20 years, in 1808.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was marked by intense debates and the need for consensus on divisive issues. The delegates' commitment to equality and liberty was tested, and they often had to set aside their ideal plans for the sake of creating a government charter acceptable to all the states.

The role of historical arguments in law

The United States Constitution is a historical document that draws from the nation's colonial roots and the political philosophies of the time. The Constitution has evolved through amendments, reflecting the country's ongoing constitutional history. The role of historical arguments in law is multifaceted and essential to understanding the past, shaping the present, and influencing the future.

Firstly, historical arguments provide context for the creation and evolution of legal documents like the Constitution. Understanding the historical context sheds light on the intentions, compromises, and considerations that shaped the law. For example, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 aimed to revise the Articles of Confederation, but ultimately, a new constitution was crafted due to concerns about the inadequacies of the Articles and the need for a stronger central government.

Secondly, historical arguments are used to interpret and apply the law. Judicial precedent often considers historical context to guide present-day decisions. For instance, the Equal Protection Clause under judicial review may consider a history of previous discrimination as a factor in its interpretation. Historical inquiries are essential to understanding the evolution of legal doctrines and their applicability in contemporary contexts.

Thirdly, historical arguments play a role in legal education and scholarship. Critical Race Theory, for example, encourages law students to engage with the full history of racial discussions, including uncomfortable truths that may have been overlooked in mainstream academia. This approach equips future legal professionals with a nuanced understanding of the law's historical context and its ongoing implications.

Additionally, historical arguments shape public perception and support for legal outcomes. Lawyers and legal scholars recognise the importance of effective communication strategies to build public support for social justice victories. By connecting legal arguments to historical contexts and broader societal narratives, legal professionals can persuade and mobilise public opinion, ensuring that legal victories are sustained and translated into meaningful change.

Lastly, historical arguments inform constitutional reforms and amendments. The South African constitution, admired for its commitment to advancing equity for historically disadvantaged groups, draws from both national and global experiences of racial discrimination and the journey towards overcoming it. This historical awareness has influenced the inclusion of explicit rights to housing, education, and basic economic survival in South Africa's constitution.

In conclusion, historical arguments are integral to law. They provide context for the creation and interpretation of legal documents, shape legal education and public perception, and inform constitutional reforms. By engaging with history, legal professionals can make more informed decisions, address injustices, and ensure that the law remains relevant and responsive to societal needs.

Frequently asked questions