The Constitution's Appeal: Why The Vote?

The United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth of 13 states to approve the document. The journey to ratification was challenging, with Federalists and Anti-Federalists on opposing sides. Federalists believed that a strong central government was necessary, while Anti-Federalists were against a powerful central government and argued for the inclusion of a bill of rights. Hamilton and James Madison led the lobbying efforts for votes in favor of ratification. They produced The Federalist Papers, a collection of 85 essays explaining and defending the proposed new government. The first state to ratify the Constitution was Delaware on December 7, 1787, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. The Constitution addressed concerns about the previous governing document, the Articles of Confederation, which lacked enforcement powers and the ability to regulate commerce or print money.

Explore related products

We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution

$31.99 $39.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Words That Made Us: America's Constitutional Conversation, 1760-1840

$22.76 $40

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings (Leather-bound Classics)

$13.21 $24.99

A stronger, more centralized government was needed

In the years following the Revolutionary War, America's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave the Confederation Congress the authority to make rules and request funds from the states. However, it lacked enforcement powers, could not regulate commerce, and could not print money. This led to disputes among the states over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, threatening the country's stability.

Alexander Hamilton of New York, recognizing the need for a stronger central government, led the call for a constitutional convention in 1787 to reevaluate the nation's governing document. The delegates, representing diverse interests and views, aimed to amend the Articles of Confederation. However, they ultimately proposed and created a new form of government, resulting in the Constitution.

The Federalists, who supported a strong central government, believed it was necessary to address the nation's challenges. They argued that a centralized government was essential for the country's stability and to effectively manage interstate disputes. Hamilton, along with James Madison and John Jay, produced "The Federalist Papers," a series of 85 essays published in newspapers nationwide, explaining and defending the proposed new government's functions.

The ratification process was not without opposition. The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the Constitution, argued that it created a powerful central government reminiscent of the one they had overthrown. They also criticized the lack of a bill of rights. The Federalists countered these arguments, assuring the public that the new government would first adopt a bill of rights. The "vote now, amend later" compromise played a crucial role in securing victory in states like Massachusetts, ultimately leading to the Constitution's ratification.

The Articles of Confederation had no enforcement powers

The United States Constitution was ratified in 1787, replacing the Articles of Confederation as the nation's governing document. The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states. However, it had several limitations, including a lack of enforcement powers. This meant that the central government had no mechanism to ensure that its decisions were carried out by the states, leading to concerns about the young country's stability and unity.

The Articles of Confederation lacked enforcement powers, which created significant challenges for the country. Without enforcement powers, the central government under the Articles of Confederation struggled to effectively govern the states, which acted more like independent, sovereign countries. This resulted in disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, threatening to tear the nation apart. The lack of enforcement powers also made it difficult for the central government to regulate commerce, print money, or address economic issues.

The inability to enforce its decisions highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and the need for a stronger, more centralized government. The lack of enforcement powers was a key factor in the call for a constitutional convention in 1787, led by Alexander Hamilton, to reevaluate the nation's governing document. The delegates assembled in Philadelphia, intending to amend the Articles of Confederation. However, they ultimately decided to create a new form of government, resulting in the proposal and adoption of the United States Constitution.

The Constitution established a stronger central government with the power to enforce its laws and regulations. It provided a framework for resolving disputes between states and addressing economic and trade issues. The Constitution also granted Congress the power to regulate commerce and gave it the authority to print money. These changes addressed the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation and provided the necessary tools for the effective governance of the country.

The ratification of the Constitution was not without opposition. Some Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government at the expense of the states' rights. They believed that a strong central government could infringe on individual liberties and reminded them of the monarchy they had recently overthrown. Despite these concerns, Federalists, who supported the Constitution, successfully lobbied for its ratification, emphasizing the need for a strong central government to face the nation's challenges.

The Federalists believed a strong central government was necessary

Alexander Hamilton of New York led the call for a constitutional convention to reevaluate the nation's governing document, and delegates from all 13 states convened in Philadelphia in May 1787. Although the initial purpose was to amend the Articles of Confederation, the delegates ultimately decided to create a new form of government. They recognized the need for a stronger central government but were also wary of centralized power and loyal to their states. As a result, they crafted a powerful central government through compromises, such as agreeing to count enslaved Africans as three-fifths of a person and allowing the slave trade to continue until 1808.

The Federalists faced opposition from the Anti-Federalists, who argued that the Constitution created a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown. The Anti-Federalists also criticized the lack of a bill of rights in the Constitution. However, the Federalists countered by arguing that a catalogued list of rights might be incomplete and that the national government was constrained by the Constitution, posing no threat to the rights of citizens.

The ratification campaign was a close contest, and the Federalists needed to convert at least three states. The tide turned in Massachusetts, where the "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory, eventually leading to the Constitution's ratification. The Federalists assured the public that the new government's first step would be to adopt a bill of rights, which was proposed in Congress in 1789.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence: Senator Rand Paul, Delegates of The Constitutional Convention

$2.99 $2.99

The People's Guide to the United States Constitution

$13.39 $15.95

Born Equal: Remaking America’s Constitution, 1840–1920

$36.96 $40

American Constitutional History: A Brief Introduction

$36.95 $36.95

America's Constitution: A Biography

$4.99 $22

The vote now, amend later compromise

The United States Constitution was approved by a majority of delegates to the Constitutional Convention on September 17, 1787, after three months of heated debate. The delegates swiftly returned to their homes to organize support, most for but some against the proposed charter. The Constitution had to withstand public scrutiny and debate before it could become the law of the land.

The first real test for ratification occurred in Massachusetts, where the "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory. The Federalists, who believed that a strong central government was necessary, needed to convert at least three states. The Anti-Federalists fought hard against the Constitution because it created a powerful central government and lacked a bill of rights. The ratification campaign was a nail-biter.

The tide turned in Massachusetts, and the "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory in that state and eventually in the final holdouts. The terms of the Massachusetts Compromise reached in February 1788 stipulated that amendments to that effect—what became the Bill of Rights—would be immediately proposed. The first state to ratify the Constitution was Delaware on December 7, 1787, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut.

The Federalists successfully countered most criticism. They argued that a catalogued list of rights might be incomplete and that the national government was so constrained by the Constitution that it posed no threat to the rights of citizens. Ultimately, during the ratification debate in Virginia, Madison conceded that a bill of rights was needed, and the Federalists assured the public that the first step of the new government would be to adopt a bill of rights.

The Electoral College system was proposed

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention first met in May 1787 and, after months of heated debate, appointed a Committee of Detail to put their decisions in writing. A Committee of Style and Arrangement then condensed the articles into a final form, which was signed by 39 delegates on September 17, 1787. The Constitution was then laid before the United States in Congress assembled on September 20, beginning a ratification process that would see it become the law of the land.

The ratification of the Constitution was not without controversy, with Federalists and Anti-Federalists engaging in a heated campaign. The Federalists, led by Hamilton and Madison, argued for a strong central government and published essays defending the proposed new government. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed the creation of a powerful central government and criticized the lack of a bill of rights.

The first state to ratify the Constitution was Delaware, on December 7, 1787, followed by eight other states over the next ten months. The ratification process was a close call, with the Massachusetts "vote now, amend later" compromise proving pivotal. The tide turned, and the Constitution was eventually ratified by the necessary nine states, with the Bill of Rights assured as the first step of the new government.

The Electoral College system, as outlined in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution, left control of elections to individual states, which led to unfair voting practices. Initially, only white men with property were routinely allowed to vote, and it would take decades of struggle for African Americans, women, Native Americans, and young citizens to secure their right to vote.

Frequently asked questions