The Federalist And Anti-Federalist Standoff

The ratification of the US Constitution in 1787 was a long and arduous process, with citizens quickly separating into two groups: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the Constitution and argued for a stronger, more centralized government. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Melancton Smith, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams, opposed the Constitution, believing it consolidated too much power in the federal government and the presidency, resembling a monarchy. The Anti-Federalists advocated for state governments to hold more power to protect the liberties of the people. The debate played out in state conventions, essays, and the press, with the Federalists ultimately persuading enough states to ratify the Constitution, though the Bill of Rights was added later to address Anti-Federalist concerns.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$7.38 $8.95

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$5.59 $10

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$76.09 $85

The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers (Hackett Classics)

$10.59 $11

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The Federalist Papers

The authors of The Federalist Papers wished to influence the vote in favour of ratifying the Constitution, which they believed would create the greatest republican form of government. The essays explain particular provisions of the Constitution in detail and are thus often used today to interpret the intentions of those who drafted it. Hamilton and Madison, both members of the Constitutional Convention, recruited collaborators for the project, and the papers were published at a rapid pace, with three to four new essays appearing in the papers in a single week. This overwhelmed any potential response from critics of the Constitution.

The Anti-Federalist Papers

The Anti-Federalists' works were published in newspapers, such as the New York Journal, and as pamphlets, over a number of years. They failed to prevent the ratification of the Constitution, which took effect in 1789, but they did succeed in influencing the creation of the United States Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights of American citizens, such as the right to free speech and the right to a speedy trial.

The Bill of Rights

The debate over the ratification of the new Constitution in 1787 divided Americans into two groups: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the Constitution and argued for a stronger, more centralized government. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Melancton Smith, Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and Richard Henry Lee, opposed the Constitution, believing it consolidated too much power in the federal government and the presidency, resembling a monarchy. They advocated for state governments to hold more power.

The Anti-Federalists played a crucial role in the ratification debate, expressing their concerns through essays, debates, and pamphlets, which later became known as the "Anti-Federalist Papers". They demanded amendments to protect the liberties of the people, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press. As a result, the Federalists promised to consider these amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, after the Constitution was ratified.

The inclusion of the Bill of Rights was a significant compromise that helped gain support for the ratification of the Constitution. The Constitution was ratified by the required nine states by June 21, 1788, with New Hampshire being the ninth state to approve. However, it was not until May 29, 1790, that Rhode Island became the final state to ratify the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights was ratified a year later. The Bill of Rights has since become the most important part of the Constitution for most Americans, frequently debated and cited in Supreme Court cases.

Explore related products

An Anti-Federalist Constitution: The Development of Dissent in the Ratification Debates (American Political Thought)

$27.3 $42.99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788 ( Complete )

$15

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates[ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS & THE C][Mass Market Paperback]

$21.97 $44.95

Reflection and Choice: The Federalists, the Anti-Federalists, and the Debate that Defined America

$49.95

The Anti-Federalist Papers: The merits of the United States Constitution of 1787 | The series of anti-Federalist papers and National debates and many other events (Final Part)

$8.49

The Anti-Federalist Papers

$0.99 $15.99

The Three-Fifths Rule

The debate over the ratification of the new constitution in 1787 was between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the new constitution, while the Anti-Federalists opposed it. The Three-Fifths Rule, also known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, was a critical element of the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This rule stated that each slave was counted as three-fifths of a white person for the purposes of representation. In other words, slaves were considered to be three-fifths of a person when it came to determining the number of representatives and electoral votes each state would have.

The Southern slaveholders wanted slaves to be included in the population count for representation purposes, while people from the Northern states feared that counting slaves would give the Southern states too much power. The Three-Fifths Rule was a compromise that attempted to address these competing interests. By counting slaves as three-fifths of a person, the Southern states gained additional representation, but not as much as they would have if slaves were counted as whole persons.

The interpretation of the Three-Fifths Rule has been a subject of debate, with some critics arguing that it relegated Blacks to the status of "three-fifths of a person." However, this interpretation has been disputed, as the Constitution used the term "other Persons" to refer to slaves, indicating that they were included in the population count, albeit with reduced representation. The Northern states and abolitionists played a role in ensuring that slaves were counted, as excluding them would have implied that they were not human, which was not their position.

The Consolidation of Power

The debate over the ratification of the new Constitution in 1787 divided Americans into two groups: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the Constitution and argued for a stronger, more centralized government. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and Richard Henry Lee, opposed the Constitution, believing that it consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress and the unitary president, resembling a monarch. They advocated for power to reside in state governments instead.

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists engaged in a year-long debate through essays, speeches, and pamphlets, known as the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers, respectively. The Federalists argued that reelecting the president and reappointing senators by state legislatures would create a body of experienced leaders. They also defended the new form of government, explaining how it would function. The Anti-Federalists, meanwhile, demanded amendments to protect the liberties of the people, such as the Bill of Rights, which would secure basic rights like free speech, a speedy trial, and due process.

The ratification process required approval from at least nine of the 13 state legislatures. The first state to ratify was Delaware, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. The debate was particularly contentious in larger states like New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, which had significant power and influence. These states initially opposed the Constitution, fearing it would deprive them of power and require them to provide tax money to support the new government.

However, the tide turned when Virginia ratified the Constitution on June 25, 1788, leaving New York as the last large state to join the union. Facing opposition, Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote a series of essays to persuade New Yorkers, and on July 26, 1788, New York narrowly voted to accept the Constitution. This marked a significant step towards the consolidation of power under the new Constitution.

The remaining states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, eventually ratified the Constitution as well, with Rhode Island being the last state to approve it in May 1790. The Bill of Rights, a crucial component of the Constitution, was ratified a year later, securing the rights and freedoms of American citizens. The journey to ratification was long and challenging, but it ultimately led to the formation of a stronger, more centralized government for the United States of America.

Frequently asked questions