South Africa's Political Landscape: Which Parties Stand With Israel?

The relationship between South African political parties and Israel is a complex and often contentious issue, reflecting broader ideological divides within the country. While some parties, such as the Democratic Alliance (DA), have historically maintained a more neutral or supportive stance toward Israel, emphasizing diplomatic engagement and economic ties, others, like the African National Congress (ANC) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), have been vocal critics of Israeli policies, particularly regarding the Palestinian conflict. The ANC, rooted in its anti-apartheid struggle, often aligns with the Palestinian cause, calling for solidarity and advocating for Palestinian statehood. The EFF takes an even more radical position, frequently condemning Israel and calling for the severance of diplomatic relations. Smaller parties, such as the Freedom Front Plus, may adopt more nuanced positions, balancing national interests with international relations. This divergence highlights the multifaceted nature of South Africa's political landscape and its global allegiances.

Explore related products

The South Africa Reader: History, Culture, Politics (The World Readers)

$27.48 $30.95

A History of South Africa, Fourth Edition

$9.99 $20

Israel and South Africa: The Many Faces of Apartheid

$24.95 $25.95

An Introduction to African Politics

$26.17 $42.99

Understanding South Africa

$21.91 $24.95

Diamonds, Gold, and War: The British, the Boers, and the Making of South Africa

$18.59 $25.99

Democratic Alliance (DA): Historically pro-Israel, supports strong bilateral ties, but some internal divisions exist

The Democratic Alliance (DA), South Africa's largest opposition party, has long been regarded as a staunch supporter of Israel, advocating for robust bilateral relations. This pro-Israel stance is deeply rooted in the party's history and ideology, which emphasizes liberal democracy, human rights, and strong ties with Western nations. The DA's position is often contrasted with that of the ruling African National Congress (ANC), which has been critical of Israel's policies toward Palestine. However, the DA's support for Israel is not without its complexities, as internal divisions and shifting global dynamics have introduced nuances to this traditionally clear-cut stance.

Historically, the DA's pro-Israel position has been driven by its alignment with Western democratic values and its opposition to what it perceives as anti-Israel bias in international forums. The party has consistently supported Israel's right to defend itself and has condemned Hamas and other militant groups for their attacks on Israeli civilians. For instance, during the 2014 Gaza conflict, the DA issued statements backing Israel's military actions while calling for a peaceful resolution. This alignment has also been reflected in the DA's engagement with Israeli political leaders and its advocacy for increased economic and cultural cooperation between the two countries.

Despite this historical alignment, internal divisions within the DA have begun to surface, particularly among younger members and those with more progressive views. Some party members argue that the DA should adopt a more balanced approach, acknowledging Palestinian grievances and Israel's role in the ongoing conflict. These divisions were evident during the 2021 Israel-Hamas conflict, when some DA leaders called for a more nuanced response, while others maintained the party's traditional pro-Israel line. This internal debate reflects broader shifts within South African society, where public opinion on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is increasingly polarized.

To navigate these divisions, the DA must strike a delicate balance between upholding its historical commitments and adapting to evolving domestic and global realities. Practically, this could involve engaging in open dialogue within the party to develop a more inclusive policy framework. For example, the DA could organize internal workshops or forums to discuss the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, inviting experts from both sides to provide diverse perspectives. Additionally, the party could emphasize its commitment to human rights and international law as a guiding principle, allowing for a more flexible and principled approach to the issue.

In conclusion, while the DA remains historically pro-Israel and supportive of strong bilateral ties, its internal divisions highlight the need for a more nuanced and inclusive stance. By addressing these challenges head-on, the party can maintain its credibility while reflecting the diverse views of its members and the broader South African public. This approach not only strengthens the DA's position but also contributes to a more informed and constructive dialogue on one of the world's most intractable conflicts.

African National Congress (ANC): Officially neutral, but some factions criticize Israel’s policies toward Palestine

The African National Congress (ANC), South Africa's ruling party, officially maintains a neutral stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict. This position is rooted in the party's historical commitment to non-alignment and its focus on domestic priorities. However, this neutrality is not without internal tension. Factions within the ANC, particularly those aligned with the party's progressive and leftist tendencies, have openly criticized Israel's policies toward Palestine. These criticisms often center on issues such as settlement expansion, the blockade of Gaza, and the treatment of Palestinian civilians. This internal divide reflects broader ideological and strategic debates within the ANC, as well as South Africa's complex relationship with the Middle East.

To understand this dynamic, consider the ANC's historical context. The party has long drawn parallels between South Africa's struggle against apartheid and the Palestinian quest for self-determination. During the apartheid era, the ANC received support from the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), fostering a sense of solidarity. Post-apartheid, this solidarity has influenced some ANC members to advocate for a more pro-Palestinian stance. However, the party's leadership has prioritized diplomatic neutrality, partly to avoid alienating international partners and to focus on South Africa's internal challenges. This balancing act highlights the ANC's dual role as both a governing party and a movement with deep historical ties to global liberation struggles.

Criticism of Israel within the ANC often manifests in parliamentary debates, public statements, and international forums. For instance, ANC lawmakers have called for the downgrading of South Africa's embassy in Israel and supported motions condemning Israeli military actions. These actions are not officially endorsed by the party but reflect the influence of pro-Palestinian factions. Notably, the ANC's Youth League and Women's League have been vocal in their support for Palestinian rights, often framing the issue as a continuation of the party's anti-colonial legacy. Such activism underscores the ANC's internal diversity and the challenges of maintaining a unified stance on contentious global issues.

Practically, this internal divide has implications for South Africa's foreign policy. While the government maintains diplomatic relations with Israel, it has also strengthened ties with Palestine, including providing humanitarian aid and political support. For individuals or organizations engaging with the ANC on this issue, it is crucial to recognize these nuances. Advocacy efforts should acknowledge the party's official neutrality while addressing the concerns of pro-Palestinian factions. Building alliances with progressive ANC members and leveraging historical solidarity can be effective strategies for influencing policy debates.

In conclusion, the ANC's stance on Israel-Palestine is a delicate balance between official neutrality and internal criticism. This duality reflects the party's multifaceted identity and its ongoing struggle to reconcile historical solidarity with contemporary diplomatic realities. For those navigating this landscape, understanding the ANC's internal dynamics and historical context is key to effective engagement. By recognizing both the party's official position and the voices of its critics, stakeholders can contribute to a more nuanced and constructive dialogue on this complex issue.

Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF): Strongly anti-Israel, advocates for Palestinian solidarity and boycotts

The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), a radical left-wing political party in South Africa, has consistently positioned itself as a staunch opponent of Israel, advocating for Palestinian solidarity and actively promoting boycotts against Israeli goods and institutions. This stance is deeply rooted in the party’s anti-imperialist ideology and its historical alignment with global liberation movements. Unlike some parties that maintain nuanced or ambiguous positions, the EFF’s rhetoric and actions are unapologetically confrontational, framing Israel as a colonial oppressor and Palestine as a symbol of resistance against global injustice.

To understand the EFF’s approach, consider their public statements and actions. During Israel’s military operations in Gaza, the party has organized protests outside the Israeli Embassy in Pretoria, calling for the expulsion of Israeli ambassadors and the severing of diplomatic ties. Their leader, Julius Malema, has repeatedly likened Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to apartheid-era South Africa, a comparison that resonates deeply with the party’s domestic constituency. The EFF’s advocacy extends beyond rhetoric; they actively campaign for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, urging South African businesses and consumers to avoid Israeli products and services.

Practically, the EFF’s anti-Israel stance translates into specific calls to action. For instance, they have pressured the South African government to ban Israeli-owned companies from operating in the country and have lobbied for the labeling of Israeli goods to enable consumer boycotts. These efforts are not merely symbolic; they aim to create tangible economic pressure on Israel. However, critics argue that such measures could harm South African workers employed by Israeli-affiliated businesses, highlighting the complexities of implementing such policies in a globalized economy.

Comparatively, the EFF’s position stands in stark contrast to parties like the Democratic Alliance (DA), which maintains a more pro-Israel stance, or the African National Congress (ANC), which adopts a more balanced approach, often calling for dialogue and a two-state solution. The EFF’s uncompromising stance appeals to its base, particularly younger voters and those disillusioned with mainstream politics. Yet, it also risks alienating potential allies and limiting the party’s diplomatic flexibility on the international stage.

In conclusion, the EFF’s strong anti-Israel stance is a defining feature of its foreign policy agenda, rooted in its ideological commitment to anti-colonialism and global solidarity. While this position resonates with its supporters and aligns with South Africa’s historical struggle against apartheid, it also presents practical challenges and divides the political landscape. For those seeking to understand South African political parties’ stances on Israel, the EFF serves as a clear example of how ideology can shape foreign policy—and the consequences that follow.

Explore related products

Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics)

$28.91 $37

Soweto Blues: Jazz, Popular Music, and Politics in South Africa

$57.36 $61

Politics and Society in South Africa (SAGE Politics Texts series)

$87 $74

Black-Brown Solidarity: Racial Politics in the New Gulf South

$25.15 $27.95

Inside African Politics

$33.36 $35

The Other Zulus: The Spread of Zulu Ethnicity in Colonial South Africa (Politics, history, and culture)

$20.03 $34.95

Freedom Front Plus (FF+): Pro-Israel, aligns with conservative values and supports Israel’s right to exist

The Freedom Front Plus (FF+) stands out among South African political parties for its unwavering pro-Israel stance, a position deeply rooted in its conservative values and ideological alignment with Israel’s right to exist as a sovereign state. Unlike some parties that adopt a neutral or critical stance toward Israel, the FF+ openly advocates for strong diplomatic ties and solidarity with the Jewish state. This alignment is not merely symbolic; it reflects the party’s broader commitment to principles such as self-determination, national sovereignty, and the defense of Western values, which it sees mirrored in Israel’s political and cultural identity.

Analytically, the FF+’s support for Israel can be understood through its core ideological framework. As a party representing the interests of Afrikaans-speaking South Africans, the FF+ emphasizes cultural preservation, minority rights, and resistance to perceived external threats. These values resonate with Israel’s narrative of survival against adversity, its emphasis on national identity, and its role as a democratic stronghold in a volatile region. By aligning with Israel, the FF+ not only reinforces its conservative credentials but also positions itself as a defender of shared principles in an increasingly polarized global political landscape.

Practically, the FF+’s pro-Israel stance translates into concrete actions and policy positions. The party consistently votes against anti-Israel resolutions in South African parliamentary debates and has openly criticized the ruling African National Congress (ANC) for its perceived bias against Israel. For instance, the FF+ has opposed South Africa’s downgrading of its embassy in Israel and has called for balanced diplomacy that acknowledges Israel’s security concerns. These actions are not just symbolic gestures but reflect a strategic effort to counter what the party views as one-sided narratives about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Comparatively, the FF+’s position on Israel sets it apart from other South African parties, many of which align with the ANC’s historically pro-Palestinian stance rooted in the anti-apartheid struggle. While parties like the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and even the Democratic Alliance (DA) often tread cautiously on the issue, the FF+ takes a bold, unapologetic approach. This distinction is deliberate, as the FF+ seeks to carve out a niche as the party of principled conservatism, unafraid to challenge mainstream narratives. For voters who prioritize Israel’s right to exist and its alignment with Western democratic values, the FF+ offers a clear and consistent choice.

In conclusion, the FF+’s pro-Israel stance is more than a foreign policy position; it is a reflection of the party’s identity and values. By aligning with Israel, the FF+ not only supports a nation it sees as a kindred spirit but also reinforces its own conservative, pro-sovereignty agenda. For supporters of the FF+, this stance is a rallying point, a testament to the party’s commitment to principles over political expediency. As South Africa’s political landscape continues to evolve, the FF+’s unwavering support for Israel will likely remain a defining feature of its platform, appealing to voters who share its vision of a world where national self-determination and democratic values are fiercely defended.

African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP): Supports Israel based on religious and historical ties

The African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP) stands out among South African political parties for its unwavering support of Israel, rooted deeply in religious and historical ties. Unlike parties driven by geopolitical strategies or economic interests, the ACDP’s stance is fundamentally theological, drawing from Christian Zionist beliefs that view Israel’s existence as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy. This perspective shapes their foreign policy advocacy, making them a unique voice in South Africa’s often critical stance toward Israel.

To understand the ACDP’s position, consider their interpretation of Scripture, particularly passages in Genesis and Ezekiel, which they believe affirm God’s covenant with the Jewish people and the land of Israel. For instance, Genesis 12:3, where God promises to bless those who bless Abraham and his descendants, is a cornerstone of their ideology. This religious framework translates into political action, such as their consistent opposition to anti-Israel resolutions in Parliament and their advocacy for stronger diplomatic ties between South Africa and Israel.

Practically, the ACDP’s support manifests in several ways. They actively engage in interfaith dialogue, often collaborating with Jewish organizations to promote mutual understanding. They also participate in international Christian Zionist networks, amplifying their voice beyond South Africa’s borders. For individuals or groups seeking to align with the ACDP on this issue, attending their public forums or joining their advocacy campaigns can be a direct way to contribute. However, it’s crucial to approach this with sensitivity, as the party’s stance can be polarizing in a country with strong pro-Palestinian sentiments.

A comparative analysis reveals the ACDP’s distinctiveness. While other parties like the Democratic Alliance (DA) may support Israel based on shared democratic values or strategic alliances, the ACDP’s backing is non-negotiable, rooted in faith rather than political expediency. This unwavering commitment has both strengths and limitations. On one hand, it provides clarity and consistency; on the other, it risks alienating voters who prioritize secular or humanitarian perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In conclusion, the ACDP’s support for Israel is a case study in how religious beliefs can directly influence political agendas. For those interested in this intersection of faith and politics, studying the ACDP offers valuable insights into the role of theology in shaping foreign policy. Whether one agrees with their stance or not, their approach underscores the complexity of South Africa’s political landscape and the diverse factors driving its international relations.

Frequently asked questions