The Constitution's Journey: From Proposal To Ratification

On the question of ratification, citizens quickly separated into two groups: Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, worried that the proposed constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution. They also argued that the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights.

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

Miracle At Philadelphia: The Story of the Constitutional Convention May - September 1787

$10.55 $19.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

The Constitutional Convention: A History Just for Kids

$13.99 $13.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitutional Convention of 1787: Constructing the American Republic (Reacting to the Past™)

$28.49 $32.5

Federalists

The Federalists were supporters of the ratification of the US Constitution. During the year-long debates over ratification, supporters of the Constitution called themselves Federalists, and their opponents were known as Anti-Federalists. Federalists defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

Alexander Hamilton was an influential Federalist who wrote many of the essays in *The Federalist*, published in 1788. These articles advocated for the ratification of the Constitution. Later, those who supported Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies formed the Federalist Party, which grew to support a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy.

To ensure the adoption of the Constitution, the Federalists promised to add amendments specifically protecting individual liberties. James Madison, for example, ultimately agreed to support a bill of rights to head off the possibility of a second convention that might undo the work of the first. Upon ratification of the Constitution and his election to the US House of Representatives, Madison introduced proposals that were incorporated in 12 amendments by Congress in 1789. States ratified 10 of these amendments, now designated as the Bill of Rights, in 1791. The first of these amendments contains guarantees of freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceable assembly, and petition and has also been interpreted to protect the right of association.

Anti-Federalists

The Anti-Federalists were opponents of the Federalists, who supported the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were a political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, they worried that the position of president might evolve into a monarchy. They also believed that the proposed constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution.

The Anti-Federalists dominated the New York Convention three to one, and New York conditionally ratified the Constitution with a call for another convention to propose a bill of rights. The Anti-Federalists' arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights, and the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

Prominent Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry, George Mason, and James Monroe. They continued to argue that the people were entitled to more explicit declarations of their rights under the new government.

Separation of powers

On the question of ratification, citizens quickly separated into two groups: Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were supporters of the Constitution and defended the document's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were concerned that the proposed constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution. They also argued that the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were at the centre of often-contentious arguments that took place in homes, taverns, and on the printed page. The Federalists' defence of the Constitution's strengthened national government was met with concern from the Anti-Federalists, who worried about the potential for a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution.

The Federalists' argument for separation of powers was a key point of contention between the two groups. The Federalists believed that the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers and more powerful executive, would provide a necessary check on state power. The Anti-Federalists, however, feared that this concentration of power at the national level could lead to tyranny and the erosion of individual liberties.

The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the ratification of the Constitution highlighted the importance of the separation of powers in the United States government. The Federalists' defence of the Constitution's strengthened national government and the Anti-Federalists' concerns about the potential for tyranny and the erosion of individual liberties both recognised the need for a balance of powers between the national and state governments. The separation of powers, as outlined in the Constitution, was intended to provide a system of checks and balances that would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful and infringing on the rights of the people.

Explore related products

Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence: Senator Rand Paul, Delegates of The Constitutional Convention

$2.99 $2.99

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787

$10.33 $18

The Selling of the Constitutional Convention: A History of News Coverage (Culture)

$44.73 $52

Madison’s Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention

$26 $26

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

Checks and balances

On the question of ratification, citizens quickly separated into two groups: Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were supporters of the Constitution and defended the document's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were concerned that the proposed constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution. They also argued that the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were at the centre of often-contentious arguments that took place in homes, taverns, and on the printed page. These arguments focused on the federal principle of balancing national and state power.

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists illustrate the divide between supporters and opponents of the Constitution. This divide was not only ideological but also played out in practical terms, with the two groups advocating for different visions of how the country should be governed. The Federalists, for example, supported a more powerful executive branch, while the Anti-Federalists worried about the potential concentration of power.

Federalism

On the question of ratification, citizens quickly separated into two groups: Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported the Constitution and its strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, worried that the proposed constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution. They also argued that the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights.

Federalists defended the Constitution, arguing that it supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. They believed that the new government would provide a stronger national government with greater congressional powers, a more powerful executive, and an independent judiciary. Federalists saw the Constitution as a way to balance national and state power, ensuring that the government had the necessary tools to function effectively while still maintaining a degree of independence for the states.

Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were concerned that the Constitution gave too much power to the national government and took away power from the states. They believed that the Constitution went against the principles of the American Revolution, which had fought for limited government and individual freedoms. Anti-Federalists also argued that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights, which they saw as a necessary protection for the rights and liberties of citizens.

The debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were often contentious and took place in homes, taverns, and on the printed page. The Federalists ultimately prevailed, and the Constitution was ratified, but the Anti-Federalists' concerns led to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which became the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

The ratification of the Constitution was a significant moment in American history, shaping the country's political system and the balance of power between the national government and the states. The debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists highlighted the complexities and challenges of creating a system of government that balanced the need for a strong national government with the protection of individual rights and state autonomy.

Frequently asked questions