Britain's Constitution: What Document Rules The Uk?

The United Kingdom's constitution is unique in that it is uncodified, meaning it is not contained in a single document. Instead, it is spread across various sources, including specific Acts of Parliament, constitutional conventions, and judicial decisions. While some argue that this system is confusing and ambiguous, others contend that it allows for greater flexibility and adaptability. The UK's constitution has evolved over time, incorporating landmark statutes such as the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights of 1689, and the Human Rights Act of 1998. Parliamentary sovereignty is a key principle, with Parliament possessing the power to make or unmake any law without being constrained by a constitutional text. The UK's constitution has multiple guardians, including the Supreme Court, the House of Lords, and specific constitutional watchdogs, who work to uphold key constitutional principles and ensure the system's functionality.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Tudor Constitution: Documents and Commentary:2nd (Second) edition

$114.52 $64

The British Constitution

$34.99 $58

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$19.99 $3.89

The Stuart Constitution, 1603–1688: Documents and Commentary

$85.75 $101

The Eighteenth-Century Constitution 1688-1815: Documents and Commentary

$49.99 $55

The UK constitution is uncodified

The UK constitution is unique in that it is uncodified, meaning that it is not set out in a single constitutional document. Instead, it comprises written and unwritten arrangements, including specific Acts of Parliament, understandings of how the system should operate (constitutional conventions), and various decisions made by judges. This makes the UK constitution more dynamic and flexible than those of other countries, as it can be easily changed without a demanding amendment process.

However, this flexibility can also be a drawback. The lack of a clear, codified constitution can make it difficult for citizens to fully understand the rules and responsibilities of the government, enabling those in power to exploit the ambiguity and making it harder to hold them accountable. The flexible nature of the UK constitution also means that it is subject to multiple interpretations, which can lead to conflict between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.

Another key feature of the UK's uncodified constitution is parliamentary sovereignty. This means that Parliament can make or unmake any law without being limited by a constitutional text, and can even overrule fundamental rights. This concentration of power in Parliament has been criticised as leading to an excessively powerful government that is not legally constrained by the observance of fundamental rights.

The UK's uncodified constitution has evolved over time, adapting to the changing values of society. It includes statutes, common law, and conventions, with roots stretching back to the Magna Carta in 1215. The dispersal of the constitution across various sources can make it challenging to identify and understand, but it allows for greater adaptability and responsiveness to the needs of a modern, democratic country.

The constitution is spread across multiple documents

The United Kingdom's constitution is spread across multiple documents and is not codified into a single text. This is in contrast to most other countries, where the constitution is typically a written, codified document. The UK's constitution comprises written and unwritten arrangements, including specific Acts of Parliament, constitutional conventions, and judicial decisions.

The UK's uncodified constitution has both benefits and drawbacks. On the one hand, it allows for easy alteration and adaptation to changing circumstances. Parliamentary sovereignty, a cornerstone of the UK constitution, means that Parliament can make or unmake any law without being limited by a constitutional text. This flexibility enables the UK's constitution to evolve organically over time to respond to political, economic, and social changes.

On the other hand, the lack of a codified constitution can lead to confusion and ambiguity. Citizens may find it challenging to understand the constitution, making it difficult to hold the government accountable. The dispersal of constitutional principles across multiple documents can make it harder to identify and comprehend the roles and responsibilities of different political institutions.

Examples of constitutional statutes include the Magna Carta (1215), Bill of Rights (1689), Acts of Union (1707 and 1800), Act of Settlement (1701), Parliament Acts (1911 and 1949), Human Rights Act (1998), Scotland Act, Northern Ireland Act, and Government of Wales Act (1998). Constitutional conventions include the monarch acting on ministerial advice and the Prime Minister sitting in the House of Commons.

While the UK's uncodified constitution has its unique characteristics, there have been calls for constitutional reform and the creation of a written constitution. The Scottish independence referendum in 2014 and the Brexit referendum in 2016 have further strengthened the case for constitutional changes, with some arguing that a more decentralized or federal system is needed to preserve the UK's unity.

Parliamentary sovereignty

The United Kingdom's constitution is distinct from that of most other countries in that it is uncodified, meaning that it is not contained in a single document. Instead, it is spread across several sources, including specific Acts of Parliament, constitutional conventions, and judicial decisions. This makes the UK constitution relatively easy to change, as no provisions are formally entrenched.

The traditional view, put forward by 19th-century constitutional theorist A. V. Dicey, is that Parliament had the power to make any law except any law that bound its successors. In other words, Parliament is free to enact legislation in any area of law it chooses, and Acts of Parliament take precedence over subordinate legislation, regulation, or common law rules. This view, however, is not universally held.

The concept of parliamentary sovereignty was central to the English Civil War, with Royalists arguing that power was held by the king and delegated to Parliament, a view that was challenged by the Parliamentarians. The issue of taxation was a significant power struggle between Parliament and the king during the Stuart period. The Bill of Rights of 1689 removed royal powers and the ability of the Crown to ignore or suspend legislation and statutes.

The UK's uncodified constitution has been criticised as confusing and ambiguous, making it difficult for citizens to understand and hold the government accountable. Proponents of a codified constitution argue that clearly stating how the political system operates would enable better governance and citizen engagement.

Explore related products

The British Constitution

$25.95

Canada's Founding Documents: The British North American Act, the act of the Union 1840, Confederation of 1867, Legislative Autonomy in 1931 and more

$14.99

Les Constitutions des Campagnes de l'Alsace au moyen-aÌ‚ge. Recueil de documents ineÌdits, etc.

$26.44

Documents on the Nineteenth Century United Kingdom Constitution (Documents on the Nineteenth Century United Kingdom Constitution, 4)

$154.56

Documents on the Nineteenth Century United Kingdom Constitution: Volume I: Reform

$69.99 $160

Documents on the Nineteenth Century United Kingdom Constitution: Volume II: People, Parties and Politicians

$69.99

Constitutional reform

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a constitutional monarchy with a Westminster system of parliamentary democracy. It is made up of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The UK government operates a system of devolution, with power transferred from the central UK parliament to the devolved legislatures of the Scottish Parliament, the Senedd, and the Northern Ireland Assembly, each with their own first ministers.

The UK constitution is unique in that it is uncodified, meaning there is no single constitutional document. Instead, it comprises written and unwritten arrangements, including specific Acts of Parliament, constitutional conventions, and judicial decisions. This makes it relatively easy for the government to change the constitution, as no provisions are formally entrenched. However, this lack of a codified constitution has been criticised as confusing and ambiguous, making it difficult for citizens to understand and hold the government accountable.

The Conservative-Lib Dem coalition also agreed on several constitutional reforms, including the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, which was later repealed by the Boris Johnson government in 2022. Other proposed reforms by the coalition included changing the voting system for Westminster elections, House of Lords reform to create an elected chamber, House of Commons reform to reduce the number of constituencies, and Local Government reform to enable the direct election of mayors.

Other proposals for constitutional reform in the UK include electoral reform, such as replacing the first-past-the-post voting system with proportional representation or lowering the voting age to 16. The Conservative government in 2015 proposed a British Bill of Rights but did not introduce legislation. There have also been calls for the reform or replacement of the Human Rights Act 1998, and for the disestablishment of the Church of England as the official church.

The Magna Carta

The United Kingdom's constitution is unique in that it is not contained in a single document. Instead, it is spread across several places, including specific Acts of Parliament, constitutional conventions, and judicial decisions. One of the most important documents that make up the UK's constitution is the Magna Carta, which dates back to 1215.

Magna Carta, Medieval Latin for "Great Charter", was a royal charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on June 15, 1215. It was drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal Stephen Langton, to make peace between the unpopular king and a group of rebel barons who demanded that the King confirm the Charter of Liberties. The Magna Carta promised the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift and impartial justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons.

However, neither King John nor the barons upheld their commitments, and the charter was annulled by Pope Innocent III, leading to the First Barons' War. After John's death, the regency government of his young son, Henry III, reissued the document in 1216, stripped of some of its more radical content, in an unsuccessful attempt to build political support. The Magna Carta was reissued several more times in the following years, and it became part of English political life, typically renewed by each monarch.

The enduring influence of the Magna Carta comes not from its detailed expression of the feudal relationship between lord and subject but from its more general clauses, which have been interpreted and applied in different ways over time. The right to petition, habeas corpus, and the concept of due process are all derived from the language in the Magna Carta, and it also influenced the development of Parliament and the Declaration of Independence in the US.

Frequently asked questions