The Constitution's Religious Freedom Clause Explained

The topic of religion in the US Constitution has been a subject of debate and interpretation, with the document addressing religion in a limited capacity. The Constitution includes the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, which respectively prohibit Congress from establishing a religion and protect an individual's right to religious belief and practice. Article VI, also known as the No Religious Test Clause, states that no religious Test shall ever be required as Qualification for federal officeholders, ensuring religious liberty and equality. The First Amendment addresses religion, stating that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, reflecting the founders' intent to prevent a nationally established religion. While the Constitution does not include the phrase separation of church and state, its provisions protect religious freedom and prevent government interference in religious affairs.

Explore related products

The U.S. Constitution: Explained--Clause by Clause--for Every American Today

$9.97 $12

The Establishment Clause: Religion and the First Amendment

$29.99

The Godless Constitution and the Providential Republic (Emory University Studies in Law and Religion (EUSLR))

$26.48 $32.99

Religious Liberty and the American Founding: Natural Rights and the Original Meanings of the First Amendment Religion Clauses

$28.39 $30

How to Write Articles, Constitution and Bylaws for Churches

$12.99

Establishment of Religion Clause: The First Amendment: Its Constitutional History and The Contemporary Debate (Bill of Rights)

$17.02 $19.99

The Establishment Clause

The Supreme Court has also ruled on cases involving the Free Exercise Clause, which complements the Establishment Clause. This clause prohibits the government from interfering with an individual's exercise of religion. In Cantwell v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court ruled that a local ordinance that required a license for religious solicitation violated the Free Exercise Clause.

The Free Exercise Clause

> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

The Supreme Court has interpreted limits to the Free Exercise Clause and allowed the government to legislate against certain religious practices, such as bigamy and peyote use. In recent years, the Court has generally adopted a more restrictive view of the protections of the Free Exercise Clause. The Supreme Court has also suggested that a government policy does not violate the Free Exercise Clause unless it has a coercive effect on a person's religious exercise.

Religious Tests for Office-Holding

The U.S. Constitution prohibits any religious requirements for holding federal office. Article VI, Clause 3, also known as the No Religious Test Clause, states that "no religious Test shall ever be required as Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States". This clause is the only explicit reference to religion in the original seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.

The No Religious Test Clause was added to the Constitution to prevent the return of religious favouritism and discrimination that had been experienced under the English Test Acts of the 17th and 18th centuries. These acts, which were also common throughout Europe, were used to establish the Church of England as the official national church and excluded anyone who was not a member, notably Catholics and "nonconforming" Protestants, from holding government office.

In the United States, religious qualifications for holding office were pervasive throughout the states at the time the Constitution was adopted. Delaware's constitution, for example, required government officials to "profess faith in God the Father, and in Jesus Christ His only Son, and in the Holy Ghost". The Framers of the federal Constitution, however, prohibited religious tests for federal office-holding, though it is unclear why they did so. There is little record of debate or discussion about this provision, and the ban was controversial during the ratification process, evoking passionate criticism.

Despite the No Religious Test Clause, eight states include language in their constitutions requiring state officeholders to have particular religious beliefs or protecting those who do. However, these requirements are unenforceable due to the Supreme Court's decision in Torcaso v. Watkins (1961), which ruled that religious tests for state office-holding violate the religion clauses of the First Amendment. The Court declared that "neither a State nor the Federal Government can constitutionally force a person 'to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion'".

While the No Religious Test Clause prevents religious requirements for holding federal office, it is important to note that most presidents have been sworn in with a Bible, and they traditionally seal their oath of office with the phrase "so help me God". Additionally, according to a 2020 survey, roughly half of Americans feel it is important for a president to have strong religious beliefs.

Explore related products

Religion and the Constitution, Volume 2: Establishment and Fairness

$47 $47

The Supreme Court and Religion in American Life, Vol. 1: The Odyssey of the Religion Clauses (New Forum Books)

$26.96 $81

The Founding Myth

$17.7 $18.99

The Yoder Case: Religious Freedom, Education, and Parental Rights (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$24.99 $29.99

Prison Religion: Faith-Based Reform and the Constitution

$37 $37

The Impossibility of Religious Freedom: New Edition

$24.15 $35

Religious Influences on the State

The Constitution of the United States has had a significant influence on the role of religion within the nation's states. The Constitution's impact on religion is primarily through the First Amendment, which contains two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.

The Establishment Clause, as outlined in the First Amendment, prohibits the government from "establishing" a religion. This clause ensures that Congress cannot adopt any particular religion as the national religion. Historically, this meant prohibiting state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. While the precise definition of "establishment" has evolved, the Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to allow the government to legislate against certain religious practices that conflict with federal law, such as bigamy and peyote use.

The Free Exercise Clause, on the other hand, protects an individual's right to believe and practice their religion. This clause safeguards individuals from laws that would expressly inhibit them from engaging in religious practices. However, there are limits to this clause, as the Supreme Court has ruled that religious practices cannot violate federal laws or infringe on the rights of others. For example, in the case of Cantwell v. Connecticut, the Court upheld the freedom of religion but also ruled that religious solicitation without a license was a violation of law.

The Constitution also addresses religion in Article VI, which includes the No Religious Test Clause. This clause specifies that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." This provision prohibits religious discrimination in holding public office and ensures that religion is not a requirement for public service. This clause was added to prevent religious tests, such as those used to establish the Church of England, from becoming a condition for office-holding in the United States.

While the Constitution sets the foundation for the relationship between religion and the state, public opinion and court interpretations also play a role in shaping this dynamic. Surveys indicate that Americans hold varying views on the role of religion in the public sphere, with some supporting the presence of religious symbols and practices in government contexts, while others advocate for a stricter separation of church and state. The Supreme Court has also weighed in on these matters, ruling on cases involving prayer in public schools and religious displays on government property, further shaping the influence of religion on the state.

Religious Displays on Government Property

The topic of religion in the US Constitution is addressed in the First Amendment, which states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The First Amendment guarantees religious freedom and prohibits Congress from establishing an official religion. This is known as the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, respectively. The Constitution also includes Article VI, which states that "no religious Test shall ever be required" for federal officeholders, ensuring that religion is not a requirement for holding public office.

The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause have been the subject of much interpretation and debate, with the Supreme Court playing a significant role in defining their scope and application. One area of contention is religious displays on government property, which has been addressed in several court cases.

In Lynch v. Donnelly (1984), the Supreme Court reviewed a city-owned Christmas display on public property in a shopping area that included Santa, his reindeer, and a nativity scene known as a crèche. The Court's decision in this case did not provide clear guidance on religious displays on government property, and the Court's rulings in subsequent cases have been varied and dependent on the specific circumstances of each case.

In Capitol Square Review Bd. v. Pinette (1995), the Court upheld the KKK's right to display a cross on a public plaza outside a state courthouse, distinguishing between private displays and state-sponsored ones. The Court ruled that the First Amendment right to free speech protected such displays, and any content-based restrictions must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.

In another case, Buono v. Norton (2004), a federal court of appeals ordered the removal of a cross from federal land, holding that a reasonable observer would perceive it as a governmental endorsement of religion. This case involved congressional attempts to influence the outcome, including passing an appropriations bill forbidding the use of government funds to remove the cross and designating the cross as a "national memorial."

The ACLU has also been active in this area, working to ensure that governmental displays do not favor one religion over others or religion over non-religion. The ACLU argues that government-sponsored religious displays violate the religious neutrality guaranteed by the Constitution.

While the First Amendment protects the rights of individuals and private organizations to display religious symbols, the Establishment Clause prohibits the government from endorsing or promoting a particular religion. However, the line between private and state-sponsored displays can sometimes be blurred, and the Supreme Court has acknowledged that the First Amendment's clauses on religion are not always clear or easily applied.

Frequently asked questions