Marriage And The Constitution: Where's The Connection?

The Constitution does not explicitly mention marriage, and therefore, it is not a power delegated to the federal government to regulate. The Fourteenth Amendment, however, has been interpreted to protect the freedom of choice to marry without racial discrimination. In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of interracial marriage in the case of Loving v. Virginia, stating that the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom to marry a person of another race cannot be infringed by the state. Additionally, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to recognize the existence of a fundamental right to marry, which includes the right of same-sex couples to marry.

Explore related products

The United States Constitution: What It Says, What It Means: A Hip Pocket Guide

$5.99

California State Constitution 2025: Includes Proposition 3 (2024): Constitutional Right to Marry

$19.99 $19.99

Sex and the Constitution: Sex, Religion, and Law from America's Origins to the Twenty-First Century

$19.83 $35

A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before

$13.77 $22.95

The Words We Live By: Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution

$9.84 $19.99

The Constitution of California: 2025 Edition with all Amendments and Subject Index

$24.95 $16.95

The US Constitution does not explicitly mention marriage

The absence of an explicit mention of marriage in the Constitution has been a topic of debate, with some arguing that the Supreme Court's creation of a right to marriage ignores the Constitution and amends it improperly. The Tenth Amendment states that "powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This suggests that the federal government does not have the power to regulate marriage.

However, supporters of marriage equality argue that the Constitution should be viewed as a living document that can adapt to meet changing needs and attitudes. They contend that the Fourteenth Amendment protects the freedom of individuals to marry a person of another race, as seen in the landmark case of Loving v. Virginia in 1967. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from restricting the freedom to marry based on racial discrimination.

While the Constitution may not explicitly mention marriage, the Supreme Court has interpreted it to include a fundamental right to marry, and their decisions have shaped the legal understanding of marriage in the United States. The dynamic nature of the Constitution allows for the interpretation and protection of rights that may not be expressly stated but are inherent in the principles of individual liberty and equality.

The Supreme Court has recognised the right to marry for same-sex couples

The right to marry is a fundamental human right, recognised by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the U.S. Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:

> "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to recognise the right to marry, even though it is not expressly stated. In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of interracial marriage in the case of Loving v. Virginia, which involved a couple from Virginia, Richard and Mildred Loving. Richard was white, while Mildred was black and Native American. The Court held that the freedom to marry a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.

In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, recognising the right to marry for same-sex couples. The Court held that the government may not infringe on a person's fundamental right to marry on the basis of their sexual orientation, stating that "the right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in the concept of individual autonomy". The ruling requires all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas under U.S. sovereignty to perform and recognise the marriages of same-sex couples, granting them equal rights and responsibilities.

The recognition of the right to marry for same-sex couples by the Supreme Court was a significant development in the journey towards marriage equality in the United States. Efforts to legalise same-sex marriage began in the 1990s, with civil unions for same-sex couples established in many states. However, these unions created a separate but equal standard, as couples were denied access to federal rights and responsibilities associated with marriage. The Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law in 1996, defined marriage as between a man and a woman, allowing states to deny marriage equality.

In 2003, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that the state's constitution guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. This was followed by a series of court rulings in 2014 that found state-level bans on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. These developments led to a Supreme Court review, resulting in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision in 2015, which established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories.

The Fourteenth Amendment protects freedom of choice to marry from racial discrimination

The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the freedom of choice to marry from racial discrimination. This protection was established in the landmark case of Loving v. Virginia in 1967, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state laws banning marriage between individuals of different races violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court recognized the freedom to marry as a fundamental right, essential to the pursuit of happiness and a basic civil right.

The case centred around Richard and Mildred Loving, a white man and an African-American woman, who were arrested and charged under Virginia's anti-miscegenation law, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. They were given the choice of serving a prison sentence or leaving the state. The Lovings chose to relocate to Washington, D.C., where they legally married, but they faced difficulties in their new life away from family and familiar surroundings.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Loving v. Virginia struck down state laws prohibiting interracial marriage, holding that these laws were discriminatory and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court's decision affirmed the principle that the freedom to marry is a fundamental right, and that racial classifications should not be used to restrict an individual's choice of spouse. This ruling sent a powerful message against racial discrimination in marriage and set a precedent for future cases involving equal protection and racial equality.

While the Loving decision was a significant victory for racial equality and marriage freedom, it did not immediately end the struggle for interracial couples. Some states, such as South Carolina and Alabama, retained clauses against interracial marriage in their constitutions until 1998 and 2000, respectively. Additionally, prejudice and discrimination towards interracial couples continued even after the legal prohibitions were lifted.

The Fourteenth Amendment's protection of the freedom to marry from racial discrimination is a testament to the United States' commitment to equality and individual liberty. The Loving v. Virginia case exemplifies how the judicial system can uphold these fundamental rights and shape a more inclusive society. Today, Loving Day celebrations commemorate the courage of the Loving couple and their legacy in advancing marriage equality and civil rights in the United States.

Explore related products

Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution

$31.99

The Christian History of the Constitution of the United States of America: Christian Self-Government With Union Volume 2

$42.95

A Law Dictionary: Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States of American Union; with references to the civil and other systems of foreign law

$160

Women of the Constitution: Wives of the Signers

$69.99 $83

The U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Marriage Equality, Gift Edition: As Delivered by Justice Anthony Kennedy

$7.99

Patriarchy: Or, The Family: Its Constitution and Probation

$8.95 $27.95

The Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to recognise the right to marry

The recognition of the right to marry has been a long-fought battle in the United States, with the Supreme Court interpreting the Constitution to recognise this right. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention the right to marry, the Supreme Court has interpreted it to include this fundamental right. This interpretation has evolved over time, with the Court playing a pivotal role in shaping marriage equality.

One of the earliest interpretations of the right to marry came in 1883, with Pace v. Alabama. The case challenged Alabama's anti-miscegenation laws, which prohibited interracial marriage. The Court upheld these laws, arguing that they did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment as they applied equally to everyone, regardless of race. However, this decision was later overturned in 1967 with Loving v. Virginia.

Loving v. Virginia marked a significant shift in the Supreme Court's interpretation of the right to marry. The Court ruled that Virginia's anti-miscegenation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote, "The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State." This decision sent a strong message against racial discrimination in marriage and set a precedent for future interpretations of the right to marry.

In more recent times, the Supreme Court has continued to shape the interpretation of the right to marry, particularly in the context of same-sex marriage. In 2015, the Court issued a landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, recognising the right of same-sex couples to marry. The Court held that the government may not infringe on an individual's fundamental right to marry based on their sexual orientation, affirming that "the right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in the concept of individual autonomy." This decision built upon a growing body of case law and public discourse surrounding same-sex marriage, with courts across the country contributing to an ongoing dialogue on this issue.

While the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to recognise the right to marry, it is important to note that this right has not been universally accepted or guaranteed. For example, in 2023, the Indian Supreme Court held in Supriyo Chakraborty v Union of India that there is no fundamental right to marry under the Indian Constitution. This decision has had significant implications for marriage equality and pending petitions challenging discriminatory laws.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution has been instrumental in recognising the right to marry. Through landmark cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Obergefell v. Hodges, the Court has shaped the understanding of marriage equality and expanded the scope of this fundamental right. While there have been setbacks and differing interpretations, the overall trajectory has been towards greater inclusion and protection of individuals' rights to marry.

The Supreme Court has not considered the Constitution's text when ruling on marriage

The US Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to recognise the existence of several fundamental rights that are not expressly stated, including an individual's right to marry. The Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognise a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state.

In 2015, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark decision, Obergefell v. Hodges, recognising the right to marry as applied to same-sex couples. The Court held that the government may not infringe on a person's fundamental right to marry based on their sexual orientation, reasoning that "the right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in the concept of individual autonomy". The Court examined the nature of fundamental rights guaranteed to all by the Constitution, and the ruling requires all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas under US sovereignty to perform and recognise the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with equal rights and responsibilities.

In 1967, the US Supreme Court ruled in Loving v. Virginia, which invalidated bans on interracial unions. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote: "The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State."

While the Supreme Court has ruled on cases involving marriage, it is important to note that the Court's decisions may not always be based solely on the text of the Constitution. The Court interprets the Constitution and determines how it applies to specific cases, considering various factors such as precedent, legal principles, and societal context. The Court's rulings on marriage, such as Obergefell v. Hodges and Loving v. Virginia, have been influenced by a broader understanding of individual rights and equality, rather than a specific reference to marriage in the text of the Constitution.

Frequently asked questions