The Constitution's Education Clause Explained

The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly mention education and does not guarantee a right to public education. However, the 14th Amendment has been significant in protecting public education rights and ensuring equitable educational opportunities for students. The Amendment's Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses prohibit states from denying equal protection of the laws and from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process. The interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment in court cases, such as Brown v. Board of Education and San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, have played a crucial role in shaping the understanding of educational rights and equal access to educational opportunities. While there is no federal constitutional right to education, state constitutions have the authority to enact laws regarding education, and all fifty states have laws mandating the provision of public education services to students within certain age groups.

Explore related products

Reinventing Public Education

$15

School: The Story of American Public Education

$21.6 $25

The Constitution on Campus: A Guide to Liberty and Equality in Public Higher Education

$25 $27

Mark Twain Understanding the US Constitution Workbook, American History Books Covering Articles, Amendments, Three Branches of Government, and More, Classroom or Homeschool Curriculum

$12.07 $12.99

Policy Challenges and Political Responses: Public Choice Perspectives on the Post-9/11 World

$39.95 $109.99

American Public Education Law Primer (Peter Lang Primer)

$32.99 $37.8

The Fourteenth Amendment and public education

The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has had a significant impact on protecting public education rights, despite the Constitution not expressly mentioning education. The Fourteenth Amendment protects public education rights through its Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that a state may not "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." In 1954, the Supreme Court interpreted the Equal Protection Clause in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, which stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal". The Court's decision required all public schools in all states that had segregated students to desegregate, leading to years of desegregation efforts and court decisions regarding the constitutionality of these efforts.

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that states may not "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to have substantive and procedural protections. With substantive due process, the Fourteenth Amendment protects a parent's right to direct the educational upbringing of their child.

While the Fourteenth Amendment has helped ensure students have access to equitable educational opportunities, it is important to note that education is not a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution. The federal government is not required to provide or fund education services, and the establishment of education is one of the powers reserved for the states under the Tenth Amendment. However, the Fourteenth Amendment's impact on public education rights has been significant, and it continues to shape the educational landscape in the United States.

The Tenth Amendment and state education control

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. It expresses the principle of federalism, whereby the federal government and individual states share power by mutual agreement. The Tenth Amendment prescribes that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and that all other powers not forbidden to the states are reserved for each state or the people.

The Tenth Amendment has been interpreted to mean that education is a function of the states, and before 1965, federal involvement in K–12 education was minimal. The Fourteenth Amendment, however, requires all states to provide "equal protection of the laws" to any person within its jurisdiction. This has been used to ensure that students have access to equitable educational opportunities, and the federal government has played a role in evaluating each school district through the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

The federal government has also provided support through funding, national programs, and policy recommendations. The Department of Education, for example, publishes recommended teaching strategies and materials for teachers. States and local governments are free to act as they wish on these recommendations, but no funding will be awarded if they do not adopt these policies.

While there is no explicit guarantee of a right to public education in the US Constitution, court cases have affirmed that education is an important enough interest to warrant constitutional protection. For example, in Plyler v. Doe (1982), the Supreme Court ruled that a Texas statute denying public education to undocumented children was unconstitutional, and states could not discriminate against children based on their immigration status.

Court rulings on education rights

The Fourteenth Amendment has been central to several landmark court rulings on education rights in the US. In Brown v. Board of Education, the Court ruled that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal", overturning Plessy v. Ferguson and marking the end of legally mandated race-segregated schools. The Court held that segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that no state authority or state law may require or allow racial segregation in public education.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has also been invoked in cases concerning the rights of undocumented children of illegal immigrants. In Plyler v. Doe, the Court ruled that a Texas law denying enrollment in public schools to children not "legally admitted" to the country violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Court reasoned that education plays a fundamental role in maintaining the fabric of society and that it would be unjust to punish children for their parents' unlawful conduct.

The Supreme Court has also recognised that "liberty", protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, includes the right to choose a private education. In Pierce v. Society of Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, the Court ruled that an Oregon statute mandating public school attendance was unconstitutional. This right is now reflected in the statutes of all 50 states, which typically specify private education as an alternative or exception to public school attendance requirements.

The First Amendment has also been central to several court rulings on education rights. In Engel v. Vitale, the Court struck down a New York State rule that allowed public schools to hold a short, nondenominational prayer at the beginning of the school day, shaping the modern understanding of how the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment constrains prayer in public schools. In another case concerning the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the Court ruled in favour of students who wore black armbands to school as an expression of their dissatisfaction with US foreign policy during the Vietnam War. The Court held that the school must prove that the conduct or speech "materially and substantially interferes" with school operations to justify a ban.

In Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court ruled that race-based classifications in affirmative-action policies must be "narrowly tailored" to a "compelling government interest", such as diversity. The Court clarified that its earlier decisions for college affirmative action do not apply to public schools and that racial diversity is not a compelling government interest for public school admission.

Other notable cases include Sharif by Salahuddin v. New York State Education Department, where a federal court determined that relying exclusively on SAT scores for merit scholarships discriminated against female students, and Pennsylvania Association of Retarded Children v. Commonwealth, where the district court ruled that a Pennsylvania law allowing public schools to deny admission to students with cognitive disabilities was unconstitutional, affirming the right to free education for children with disabilities.

More recently, in Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Supreme Court recognised parental rights and religious liberty, holding that a school district's introduction of 'LGBTQ+-inclusive' storybooks and its decision to forbid opt-outs substantially interfered with the religious development of the petitioners' children.

Explore related products

Our Constitution Rocks

$10.47 $19.99

The Constitution of the United States

$1.94 $9

Essentials of Managing Public Health Organizations (Essential Public Health)

$79.16 $98.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Texas Constitution: 2025

$16.99

Factories of Obedience: How the American Education System Betrayed Our Constitution (Republic in Crisis)

$24.99

Education funding and standards

The US Constitution does not explicitly mention education, and the Supreme Court has not interpreted it to require the federal government to provide or fund education services. Instead, the Tenth Amendment reserves powers relating to education for the states. As such, state constitutions provide states with the authority to enact laws regarding education, and some even require states to provide students with an adequate education. All fifty states have laws requiring state and local governments to provide public education services to students of certain ages.

However, the Fourteenth Amendment has been used to protect public education rights. The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses prohibit states from denying equal protection of the laws and from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. For example, in the context of student discipline, the Supreme Court has ruled that students have a "legitimate entitlement to a public education as a property right" (Goss v. Lopez). This means that public schools may not deprive students of that right without due process protections, such as notice of the alleged violation and the opportunity for the student to be heard.

The Fourteenth Amendment has also been used to address educational inequality. In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, finding that segregated schools violated the Equal Protection Clause. Research by Assistant Professor Jenn Ayscue has shown that segregated schools can be systematically linked to unequal educational opportunities and outcomes, with students in minority segregated schools experiencing lower academic achievement, higher drop-out rates, and lower graduation rates.

Despite these protections, there is currently no federally protected constitutional right to education. In Gary B. v. Snyder, the question of whether education is a constitutional right protected under the Fourteenth Amendment was once again put to the test. The answer, through a series of court decisions and legislative actions, was that there is no such right, at least for now.

The lack of a constitutional right to education has resulted in disparities in funding across different school districts. For example, in San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, parents from a low-income, predominantly Hispanic district argued that it was discriminatory for their schools to receive only $37 per pupil while a wealthier neighborhood received $413 per student. Similarly, in Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court ruled that a Texas statute withholding state funds for the education of undocumented children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

While some argue that a constitutional right to education could guarantee certain levels of funding and educational standards across the country, others caution that federal regulation could decrease diversity and autonomy in education. They argue that decisions about education are best made at the local level, as states and cities have different prominent industries and cultural concerns that impact the type of education most needed or valued in a given region.

Equality in education

The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly guarantee a right to public education. However, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment has been applied to educational issues, providing the basis for the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision that laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools. The case marked the 65th anniversary of the ruling, which focused on black and white students, and the modern school population is increasingly diverse and multi-racial. Latino students are now the largest group of students of colour.

Research by Assistant Professor Jenn Ayscue shows that students who attend integrated schools have higher levels of academic achievement and improved critical thinking and communication skills. They are also more likely to have better economic outcomes, higher-paying jobs, and higher levels of civic engagement. On the other hand, segregated schools are systematically linked to unequal educational opportunities and outcomes. Students who attend minority-segregated schools have less access to advanced curricular options and rigorous coursework, and these schools experience higher rates of teacher turnover and student mobility.

The Constitution requires that all children be given equal educational opportunities, regardless of their race, ethnic background, religion, sex, socioeconomic status, or citizenship status. This constitutional guarantee of equal education is supplemented by federal, state, and local laws that protect students against discrimination in education based on sexual orientation or disability, including pregnancy and HIV status. Federal law also requires that students with disabilities be provided with an appropriate education, which must be worked out individually for each student. For example, a deaf student might be entitled to a sign language interpreter.

While the Constitution does not explicitly mention education, it does not mean that it cannot help ensure that all students have access to equal educational experiences.

Frequently asked questions