Redistricting: The Constitution's Impact And Influence

Redistricting is the process of drawing electoral district boundaries to determine who represents a particular area. Redistricting occurs at the federal level, followed by the state level, and is carried out after each ten-year census to account for population changes. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly mention the term redistricting, it does provide guidelines for proportional representation in the House of Representatives and grants states the authority to decide how their representatives will be elected. The Constitution also prohibits intentional discrimination based on race or ethnicity, which has been a concern in the redistricting process. Federal laws, such as the Voting Rights Act, aim to protect minority voting rights and ensure equal representation. The Supreme Court has played a role in interpreting the Constitution's requirements for redistricting, addressing issues such as population equality and the consideration of race and ethnicity.

Explore related products

One Person, One Vote: A Surprising History of Gerrymandering in America

$14.75 $30

Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism

$45 $90

Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty

$28.9 $45

Resolving Gerrymandering: A Manageable Standard

$59.95 $59.95

Gerrymandering: The Politics of Redistricting in the United States

$22.15 $23.95

Gerrymandering Texas

$17.16 $24.95

Article 1, Section 4

Section 4 of Article 1 states, "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators." This section grants state legislatures the primary authority to establish the rules and procedures for conducting federal elections, including the creation of electoral districts.

The concept of redistricting is inherently linked to the constitutional requirement of reapportionment, which is mentioned in Section 2 of Article 1. Reapportionment refers to the redistribution of congressional seats among the states based on population data from the decennial census. This process ensures that each state's representation in the House of Representatives reflects its population relative to other states.

Redistricting, on the other hand, involves redrawing the geographical boundaries of electoral districts within a state to account for population changes. This process is carried out by state legislatures and is guided by federal and state laws, as well as court decisions interpreting constitutional provisions related to voting rights and equal protection.

The process of redistricting aims to uphold the principle of "one person, one vote," ensuring that each electoral district has roughly the same population. It also considers factors such as racial and language minority representation, compliance with the Voting Rights Act, and the prohibition of discriminatory practices in drawing district lines.

While the specific provisions and requirements for redistricting vary across states, the underlying goal is to achieve fair and equitable representation for all citizens in the electoral process. The interplay between federal and state laws, as well as judicial interpretations, shapes the redistricting process and ensures that it aligns with constitutional principles.

Gerrymandering

Redistricting is the process of drawing new voting district boundaries, which occurs once every decade following the release of detailed population and demographic data from the Census. While redistricting is not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution gives state legislatures the authority to determine the "times, places, and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives".

While gerrymandering is widely considered a corruption of the democratic process, it has been challenging to address through the courts. The Supreme Court has ruled on several cases related to gerrymandering and voting rights, such as Thornburg v. Gingles (1986), Shaw v. Reno (1993), and Miller v. Johnson (1995). However, the specific standards for adjudicating challenges to political gerrymanders remain a subject of debate.

Voting Rights Act

Redistricting in the United States is the process of drawing electoral district boundaries for the House of Representatives and state legislatures. The US Constitution, in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, provides for proportional representation in the House, with the Reapportionment Act of 1929 setting the number of seats at 435. Article I, Section 4, states that each state's legislature has the authority to establish congressional districts and decide how representatives are elected, subject to judicial review.

The Voting Rights Act has been central to several redistricting legal challenges. In Allen v. Milligan, the US Supreme Court upheld a lower court's ruling that Alabama violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting the electoral power of Black voters when redrawing congressional districts. This decision will result in a new map for the 2024 election, creating a second Black congressional district. This case is notable for its departure from the Court's recent trend of reducing voting rights protections.

In Petteway v. Galveston County, Black and Latino voters from Texas challenged a county commission district map change that eliminated a district previously favourable to minority voters. This case highlighted the impact of the Supreme Court's 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which removed a provision requiring certain counties to obtain preclearance for changes to electoral rules and district maps.

The Yakima Valley has also seen multiple Voting Rights Act cases, with Latino voters successfully challenging the election of city councils in Yakima and Pasco. Despite this, the Washington Redistricting Commission did not create a legislative district to enhance Latino voting power. These cases demonstrate the ongoing legal battles surrounding redistricting and the Voting Rights Act, with voters of colour challenging discriminatory maps and seeking to protect their electoral power.

Explore related products

Gerrymandering: A Guide to Congressional Redistricting, Dark Money, and the U.S. Supreme Court

$20.16 $24.99

Bush v. Gore: Exposing the Growing Crisis in American Democracy (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$26.36 $32.99

Election Law and Democratic Theory

$53.15 $62.95

Election Law: Historic Supreme Court Decisions (Volume I)

$32.83 $35.2

Election Systems and Gerrymandering Worldwide (Studies in Choice and Welfare)

$92.5 $109

On the American Political Problem of Partisan Gerrymandering: How to Fix a Typically American Problem

$46.47

Population disparity

The US Constitution, in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, provides for proportional representation in the House of Representatives. The Reapportionment Act of 1929 set the number of seats in the US House of Representatives at 435, and a 1941 act made reapportionment among the states automatic after each decennial census.

The process of redistricting, which involves drawing electoral district boundaries, is used to ensure proportional representation in the House. Redistricting occurs at the state level after each census. However, it is subject to judicial review, as outlined in Colegrove v. Green (1946).

To address population disparity and ensure equal representation, various methods have been employed. One such method is the "method of equal proportions," adopted by Congress after the 1930 census. This method uses a formula that divides a state's population by the geometric mean of its current number of seats and the next seat, allocating remainders among states to minimize population differences between districts and ensure equal representation.

Another approach to addressing population disparity is the use of "traditional districting principles." These principles include requiring districts to be composed of contiguous territory, being geographically compact, respecting political boundaries, preserving communities of interest, and avoiding contests between incumbent representatives. State constitutions and laws play a crucial role in mandating these principles, with 34 states requiring state legislative districts to follow political boundaries and 15 states imposing similar constraints on congressional districts.

Additionally, population disparity has been addressed through the reduction or elimination of gerrymandering, which is the deliberate manipulation of political boundaries for electoral advantage. Critics argue that gerrymandering has been used to dilute the voting power of minority groups. To mitigate this, some states have implemented measures to reduce gerrymandering, such as prohibiting the drawing of "canoe districts" that span multiple islands, as seen in Hawaii.

State legislature boundaries

Redistricting in the United States is the process of drawing electoral district boundaries for the House of Representatives and state legislatures. The US Constitution, in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, provides for proportional representation in the House of Representatives. The Reapportionment Act of 1929 fixed the number of seats in the House at 435, and a 1941 act made reapportionment among the states by population automatic after every decennial census.

The process of redistricting at the state level involves the state legislature creating a redistricting plan, often subject to approval by the state governor. The criteria for redistricting may include equalizing the population of districts, creating compact and contiguous districts, keeping communities within a single district, and avoiding partisan gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the practice of manipulating district boundaries to achieve political advantage, such as enhancing the reelection chances of a legislator or their party.

To address concerns of intentional discrimination, the Constitution prohibits government efforts that treat similarly situated people differently based on race or ethnicity. Redistricting techniques like "cracking" and "packing" minority populations have been used to dilute the voting power of racial minorities. The Supreme Court has also stated that race or ethnicity cannot be the predominant reason for drawing district boundaries, and other factors must be considered simultaneously.

State constitutions and laws dictate which body has responsibility for drawing state legislature boundaries. Some states may prohibit mid-decade redistricting, while others may initiate it, as seen in Texas. Federal and state courts can also order redistricting between censuses if existing maps are ruled unconstitutional or in violation of federal law.

Frequently asked questions