Lincoln's Constitutional Limits: A Fine Line

Abraham Lincoln is considered one of the most compelling presidents in American history, as he faced and continues to pose some of the most significant constitutional questions. Lincoln's actions during the Civil War, such as suspending habeas corpus and deploying the military, have been scrutinized for potentially pushing the limits of the Constitution. While some argue that Lincoln's actions were permissible, others acknowledge infringements, though not egregious. Lincoln's conduct during the war highlights the importance of a strong federal government in times of crisis while also underscoring the need to uphold constitutional protections and the rule of law. His handling of secession and preservation of the Union, including the emancipation of slaves, further complicates the debate surrounding his adherence to the Constitution.

Explore related products

Lincoln: The Constitutional Lawyer

$80

Constitutional problems under Lincoln. 1951 [Leather Bound]

$23.25

Abraham Lincoln: The Lawyer-Statesman

$6.22 $65

Abraham Lincoln and constitutional government, 1916 [Leather Bound]

$21

Abraham Lincoln and Constitutional Government, Parts 1-2

$36.75

Abraham Lincoln and Constitutional Government; Volume 1

$28.95

Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus

Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus was one of his most controversial decisions. The suspension allowed the government to hold individuals indefinitely without showing cause and to try civilians in military courts. Lincoln justified the suspension by arguing that acts that might be illegal in peacetime might be necessary "in cases of rebellion", when the nation's survival was at stake.

Lincoln initially suspended habeas corpus in Maryland in 1861 to try large numbers of civilian rioters in military courts and to prevent the movement of Confederate troops on Washington. The order was eventually extended in response to different threats. In September 1862, Lincoln again suspended habeas corpus, this time throughout the country, and made anyone charged with interfering with the draft, discouraging enlistments, or aiding the Confederacy subject to martial law.

In May 1861, John Merryman, a vocal secessionist, was arrested in Maryland and held without indictment or arraignment. He appealed for his release under a writ of habeas corpus, but Chief Justice Roger B. Taney denied the president's authority to suspend habeas corpus, arguing that only Congress had the power to do so. Lincoln defended his actions in a message to Congress in July, citing Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, which allows for the suspension of habeas corpus "when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it".

The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act was passed by Congress in 1863, authorizing the president to suspend habeas corpus in response to the American Civil War. Lincoln signed the bill into law and suspended habeas corpus under the authority it granted him six months later. The Act also restricted how and why military and civilian officials could be sued, providing that anyone acting in an official capacity could not be convicted for false arrest, false imprisonment, trespassing, or any crime related to a search and seizure.

Lincoln's actions without Congressional authorisation

Abraham Lincoln is considered one of the most compelling presidents for constitutional law and history students. This is because he wrestled with some of the most fundamental and momentous questions of constitutional law. One of the most significant issues during his presidency was the debate over whether Southern states had the right to secede.

During his time in office, Lincoln took several actions without Congressional authorization in his efforts to preserve the Union. These included calling up the militia, deploying the military, and imposing a blockade. In each case, legal scholar Daniel Farber concludes that Lincoln either acted within his authority under Article II of the Constitution or subsequently obtained authorization from Congress, minimising any constitutional infringement.

One of the most controversial actions Lincoln took without prior Congressional authorization was the suspension of habeas corpus. This allowed for the arrest and indefinite detention of suspected Confederate sympathisers without trial. While some argue that this violated the Constitution, Farber contends that Lincoln's conduct of the war demonstrates the need for a strong federal government in wartime. He believes that Lincoln's actions did not circumvent the rule of law or ignore constitutional protections.

Another area where Lincoln's actions were scrutinised was in his measures to suppress free speech. For example, a case is cited where an individual opposed to the Civil War was convicted and sentenced to death for associating with someone who wanted to take armed action against the Union. After the war, the Supreme Court granted the gentleman's habeas corpus petition in Ex Parte Milligan, suggesting that Lincoln's actions may have infringed on constitutional rights to free speech and association.

Overall, while Lincoln took several actions without prior Congressional authorization, legal scholars generally argue that his conduct was largely permissible under the Constitution. In cases where there was infringement, it was typically minor and did not egregiously violate constitutional principles.

Measures to suppress free speech

Abraham Lincoln is considered one of the most compelling presidents of the United States, especially for students of constitutional law and history, as he confronted some of the most fundamental and significant questions of constitutional law. Lincoln's actions in response to the military crisis, such as "calling up the militia, deploying the military, and imposing a blockade," were generally in accordance with his authority under Article II of the Constitution. However, measures to suppress free speech during his presidency have been a subject of debate.

One notable example of Lincoln's measures to suppress free speech was the case of a gentleman who opposed the Civil War. This individual was convicted and sentenced to death, possibly for no more than associating with someone who wanted to take armed action against the Union. While this specific case may seem like an infringement of free speech, Daniel Farber, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Minnesota, argues that nearly all of Lincoln's actions were permissible under the Constitution. In his book "Lincoln's Constitution," Farber acknowledges that Lincoln's conduct of the war demonstrates the need for a strong federal government during wartime. However, he also emphasizes that it doesn't justify circumventing the rule of law or ignoring constitutional protections.

The gentleman's conviction and sentence sparked a debate about the limits of free speech during times of national crisis. After the war, in Ex Parte Milligan, the Supreme Court granted the gentleman's habeas corpus petition, recognizing the importance of balancing individuals' constitutional rights with governmental powers during times of crisis. This case set a precedent for protecting civil liberties, even in exceptional circumstances.

Lincoln's presidency was marked by a series of complex political and constitutional challenges, including the issue of secession and the debate over slavery. Lincoln's initial commitment to not interfere with slavery to keep slave states in the Union and obey the Constitution, which did not empower the federal government to abolish slavery, changed within a few months after the fall of Fort Sumter. He faced pressure from prominent Republican senators to use his power as commander-in-chief to free the slaves immediately. Lincoln navigated these demands while trying to prevent the loss of border slave states, proposing a gradual emancipation program.

In conclusion, while Lincoln's measures to suppress free speech during the Civil War may have been controversial, they were often justified by the need to preserve the Union and maintain national security. Lincoln's actions during his presidency continue to provide valuable insights and lessons for interpreting and upholding constitutional law, especially during times of crisis.

Explore related products

Abraham Lincoln and constitutional government, by Bartow A. Ulrich ... Volume pt. 3 1921 [Leather Bound]

$32.95

The Law

$0.59 $3.95

Abraham Lincoln and constitutional government, by Bartow A. Ulrich ... Volume v. 1-2 1921 [Leather Bound]

$29.87

The Abraham Lincoln Encyclopedia (Da Capo Paperback)

$97.84

Lincoln: A Life of Purpose and Power

$9.95 $27.5

Abraham Lincoln and Constitutional Government , Part 3 1920 Leather Bound

$28.75

Lincoln's response to the Southern States' secession

Abraham Lincoln's victory in the 1860 presidential election preceded the secession of seven Southern states from the Union. These states, located in the lower South, formed the Confederate States of America, adopting a constitution that differed from the U.S. Constitution in four key areas: support for states' sovereignty, guaranteed perpetual existence of slavery, prohibition of Congress from enacting protective tariffs or providing aid to internal improvements, and a limit on the presidential term to six years.

Lincoln's initial response to the Southern states' secession was shaped by his stated purpose to save the Union and his commitment to not interfere with slavery. He aimed to prevent further secession and maintain the Union by preserving the status quo on slavery, as the Constitution did not empower the federal government to abolish it. Lincoln also hoped to gain the support of Northern Democrats by refraining from using the war to end slavery.

However, Lincoln's stance on slavery began to shift within a few months after the fall of Fort Sumter. He faced increasing pressure from prominent Republican senators, particularly Charles Sumner and Ben Wade, who urged him to use his powers as commander-in-chief to immediately emancipate the slaves. Lincoln attempted to balance these demands with the need to retain the border slave states, proposing a gradual emancipation program led by the federal government.

In addition to his stance on slavery, Lincoln took several other actions in response to the Southern states' secession. He called up the militia, deployed the military, and imposed a blockade, citing his authority under Article II of the Constitution. While some of his actions were later authorized by Congress, critics argue that certain measures, such as suppressing free speech, infringed on civil liberties.

Despite the controversies surrounding his actions, Lincoln's conduct during the Civil War demonstrated the importance of a strong federal government in times of crisis. He recognized the significance of the challenge posed by secession and acted decisively while maintaining respect for the rule of law and constitutional protections.

Lincoln's use of presidential power to free slaves

Abraham Lincoln is considered one of the most compelling presidents of the United States, as he confronted some of the most fundamental and significant questions of constitutional law. Lincoln's actions to free slaves were closely tied to his interpretation of the presidential powers granted to him by the Constitution.

Lincoln personally abhorred slavery and rejected any compromise that would permit its expansion. However, he felt constrained by his constitutional authority as president to challenge slavery only within the context of necessary war measures. Lincoln's conduct of the Civil War demonstrated his belief in a strong federal government during wartime. He recognized the challenge posed by secession and acted decisively while maintaining a sense of perspective about the role of the presidency.

In July 1862, Congress authorized the president to issue a general emancipation proclamation, and Lincoln drafted the first version of what would become the Emancipation Proclamation. He waited until the North won a significant victory at the Battle of Antietam on September 22, 1862, to issue the preliminary proclamation. The Final Emancipation Proclamation, issued on January 1, 1863, designated areas still in rebellion and exempted those under Union control, including specific parishes, cities, and counties.

Lincoln's election as a Republican candidate in 1860 triggered secession by Southern states, and his administration was marked by the Civil War and the debate over slavery. Lincoln's use of presidential power to free slaves was a pivotal moment in American history, and his actions ultimately led to the abolition of slavery and its permanent eradication from the United States.

Frequently asked questions