What's The Process Of Deciding Constitutionality?

The power of a court to determine whether a law or legislative act is constitutional is called judicial review. Judicial review is a fundamental principle that allows the Supreme Court and other courts to evaluate and potentially nullify laws, actions, or decisions made by the legislative or executive branches if they are found to be unconstitutional. This power was established in the United States in the landmark case Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and any law contrary to it is void. The judiciary's role, as suggested by Alexander Hamilton, is to ensure that no legislative act that goes against the Constitution can be valid. Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court or only by special constitutional courts with the authority to rule on the validity of a statute.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$234.91 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.32 $126.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

The Supreme Court's power

The power of the Supreme Court to decide if something is constitutional is called judicial review. This power, a crucial component of the system of checks and balances, allows the Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress or decisions by the Executive Branch unconstitutional. Judicial review is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and any law contrary to it is void.

Judicial review is a fundamental principle that allows the Supreme Court and other courts to evaluate and potentially nullify laws, actions, or decisions made by the legislative or executive branches if they are found to be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court, as the highest court in the land, is the court of last resort for those seeking justice. It is also responsible for ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its power.

In addition to its power of judicial review, the Supreme Court also has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated. This power has been used to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution and to ensure that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. The Supreme Court's decisions have a significant impact on society, helping to protect civil rights and liberties and shape the country's constitutional system of government.

Judicial review

In the United States, the power of the Supreme Court to decide if something is constitutional is called judicial review. Judicial review is a fundamental principle that allows the Supreme Court and other courts to evaluate and potentially nullify laws, actions, or decisions made by the legislative or executive branches if they are found to be unconstitutional.

The power of judicial review was established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and any law contrary to it is void. This case serves as a foundational precedent for judicial review in the United States. The Supreme Court's power to conduct judicial review is a crucial component of the system of checks and balances, allowing it to act as the final arbiter on interpreting the Constitution.

While the US Constitution does not explicitly define the power of judicial review, the authority for it has been inferred from its structure, provisions, and history. The Founding Fathers made several references to the concept of judicial review during the debates at the Constitutional Convention, particularly during discussions on the Virginia Plan, which included a "council of revision" similar to today's presidential veto.

In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur when a country has no codified constitution, as in the United Kingdom and New Zealand, or when the constitution is codified, but no court has the authority to strike down laws, as in the Netherlands and Switzerland.

Legislative act or law conflicts

When a legislative act or law conflicts with the constitution, the process of determining its constitutional validity is called judicial review. This power of judicial review was established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any law contrary to it is void. Judicial review is a crucial component of the system of checks and balances, allowing the Supreme Court to act as the final arbiter in interpreting the Constitution. It enables the Court to examine and potentially nullify laws, legislative acts, executive actions, or decisions made by the legislative or executive branches if they are found to be unconstitutional.

A legislative act or law may conflict with the constitution in several ways. Firstly, there may be a conflict of laws between different jurisdictions. This occurs when a case, transaction, or occurrence has connections to more than one jurisdiction, leading to conflicting legal rules. For example, in the United States, federal courts follow different rules than state courts due to their limited jurisdiction enumerated in the Constitution. When faced with a choice of law issue, courts generally have two options: applying the law of the forum (lex fori) or the law of the site of the transaction or occurrence (lex loci).

Another context in which legislative acts or laws may conflict is in international law. While international law does not directly resolve conflicts of laws, it recognises five bases of jurisdiction: territoriality, passive personality, nationality or active personality, protective jurisdiction, and universal jurisdiction. These bases outline when a country has the jurisdiction to regulate occurrences within its territorial boundaries, address harms to its nationals, address wrongs perpetrated by its nationals, protect its security, and address certain acts universally rejected by the international community, respectively.

Additionally, within individual countries, conflicts may arise between different legal traditions, specific rules of private law, and different systems of private law. For instance, in the United States, the minimum contacts rule derived from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment regulates the extent to which one state can exercise jurisdiction over people domiciled in other states or occurrences that took place in other states.

To resolve these conflicts, domestic law, which may incorporate relevant international treaties or supranational legal concepts, is applied first. While the term "conflict of laws" is primarily used in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, other countries, such as Switzerland, use the term "private international law" to refer to similar concepts.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$297.73

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism

$59.81 $76.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$76.95 $76.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $345

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Court declares it void

The Supreme Court's power to decide if something is constitutional is called "judicial review". This power was established in the landmark case of Marbury vs Madison in 1803, where Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and any law contrary to it is void. Judicial review is a crucial component of the system of checks and balances, and it allows the Supreme Court and other courts to evaluate and potentially nullify laws, actions, or decisions made by the legislative or executive branches if they are found to be unconstitutional.

When a court determines that a legislative act or law conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This can occur in different ways depending on the type of legal system. In some countries, any court may declare a statute unconstitutional, while in others, only special constitutional courts have the authority to rule on the validity of a statute. For example, in the United States, the power of judicial review places the Supreme Court as the final arbiter on interpreting the Constitution.

The voidness doctrine holds that the judgment of a court without jurisdiction over the subject matter of an action before it is null and void. This doctrine has served to check excesses of judicial power but has also been criticised for its cost and the tension it creates between the goals of quick dispute resolution and ensuring fair and just outcomes.

In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. For instance, the United Kingdom and New Zealand have no codified constitution that laws must conform to. In contrast, countries like Switzerland have a codified constitution, but no court has the authority to strike down laws on that basis. However, Swiss voters can void federal legislation by petitioning for a direct vote of the citizenry on whether the law should be upheld.

Checks and balances

The power of the Supreme Court to decide if something is constitutional is called "judicial review". This power was established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and any law contrary to it is void. Judicial review is a crucial component of the system of checks and balances, allowing the Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress or decisions by the Executive Branch unconstitutional.

The Constitution divides the Government into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch has specific powers and is subject to checks and balances to ensure that no one branch has too much power. For example, the legislative branch makes laws, but the President in the executive branch can veto those laws with a Presidential Veto. Similarly, the legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional through judicial review.

Frequently asked questions