
Woodrow Wilson's diplomacy philosophies were largely based on his idealistic belief in the spread of democracy and moralism. Wilson's foreign policy was influenced by his messianic philosophy, which held that America had a duty to spread its principles and reflect the 'truisms' of American thought. This approach, known as Wilsonianism, marked a departure from President Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and sought to extend American friendship to Latin America. Wilson's internationalism was guided by his deep religious faith and promotion of a profound sense of moralism, which led him to frequently intervene in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America and Mexico. Wilson's main diplomatic philosophies included support for self-determination, democratic government, collective security, international law, and a league of nations. He also advocated for open diplomacy, free trade, and the creation of an intergovernmental organization, the League of Nations, to address international issues through diplomacy rather than military force.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Opposition to imperialism and interventionism | Anti-imperialism |
| Belief in the spread of democracy | Democracy |
| Belief in the spread of American principles | Moral responsibility |
| Belief in the superiority of American thought | Idealism |
| Belief in collective security through international organisations | Liberal-internationalism |
| Belief in the importance of diplomacy over force | Diplomacy |
| Belief in the importance of self-determination | Self-determination |
| Belief in the importance of free trade | Free trade |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- Wilson's foreign policy was based on moral principles and the spread of democracy
- He believed in a new diplomacy, with open agreements and no secret treaties
- Wilson's Fourteen Points outlined his vision for a new world order
- He supported self-determination and the dismantling of empires
- Wilson's diplomacy was criticised as irrationally idealistic

Wilson's foreign policy was based on moral principles and the spread of democracy
Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy was largely based on his moral principles and the spread of democracy. Wilson and his Secretary of State, William Jennings Bryan, had little experience in foreign relations when they took office. However, they were determined to base their foreign policy on moral principles rather than selfish materialism. Wilson believed that democracy was gaining strength globally and wanted to encourage this process. This was reflected in his support for independence movements in the Philippines and Puerto Rico, as well as his insistence on democratic governments in Latin America.
Wilson's foreign policy was also characterised by his messianic philosophical belief that America had a duty to spread its principles and reflect the 'truisms' of American thought. This belief, combined with his idealism and optimism about democracy's global advance, influenced his handling of World War I. Initially, Wilson aimed to maintain American neutrality and broker peace between the warring parties. However, he eventually led America into the war in 1917, with the goal of making the world "safe for democracy".
The Fourteen Points, outlined in a speech to Congress in January 1918, were Wilson's statement of principles for peace negotiations. They included his ideas on open diplomacy, free trade, self-determination, and the creation of a League of Nations. While these points were idealistic, they were also criticised as irrational and ineffective in the complex post-war landscape. Wilson's domestic racism also impacted his leadership abroad, and his vision for collective security through the League of Nations ultimately failed due to a lack of commitment from participating states.
Despite the controversies and challenges, Wilson's foreign policy had a significant impact on international politics and solidified America's status as a global leader. His emphasis on morality and democracy in foreign policy set a precedent for future American engagement on the world stage. Wilson's approach to diplomacy, including his rejection of imperialism and interventionism, shaped the modern presidency and influenced how future presidents would manage the nation's interests at home and abroad.
Flynn's Questionable Diplomatic Undertakings: What Really Happened?
You may want to see also

He believed in a new diplomacy, with open agreements and no secret treaties
Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy was based on his philosophical belief that America had a moral responsibility to spread its principles while reflecting the 'truisms' of American thought. In his "Fourteen Points" speech delivered to Congress on January 8, 1918, Wilson outlined his vision for a "new diplomacy" consisting of "open covenants openly arrived at". This marked a departure from the secret treaties of the past, which had often been negotiated without public knowledge and pulled nations into wars they wished to avoid.
Wilson's idea of "open covenants openly arrived at" reflected his belief in the importance of transparency and accountability in international relations. By making agreements and treaties public, Wilson argued, nations would be held accountable for their commitments and the risk of war would be reduced. This approach was in stark contrast to the old diplomacy, characterised by secret deals and backroom negotiations that often left the public in the dark about their country's foreign policy decisions.
The Fourteen Points, which served as guidelines for the rebuilding of the postwar world, included Wilson's ideas on nations' conduct of foreign policy. They emphasised the importance of open diplomacy, free trade, self-determination, and the creation of an intergovernmental organisation to address international issues through diplomacy rather than military force—the League of Nations. Wilson's insistence on the inclusion of the League of Nations in the Treaty of Versailles forced him to compromise on other points, and the League's inability to enforce his vision of collective security is often cited as a failure of interwar diplomacy.
Wilson's commitment to open diplomacy extended beyond his Fourteen Points. For example, he signed twenty-two bilateral treaties that agreed to cooling-off periods and outside fact-finding commissions as alternatives to war. However, critics have pointed out that Wilson's idealism, both in his handling of the conclusion of World War I and his broader foreign policy, was often at odds with the complex realities of international relations. His insistence on democratic governments in Latin America, for instance, undermined the promise of self-determination for those countries.
Campaigning Online: Rules and Regulations for Politicians
You may want to see also

Wilson's Fourteen Points outlined his vision for a new world order
Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points outlined his vision for a new world order, which he first introduced in a speech to Congress on January 8, 1918. The Fourteen Points were a set of principles for peace, designed as guidelines for the rebuilding of the postwar world and the conduct of foreign policy.
In his speech, Wilson addressed the causes of World War I, attributing the conflict to secret treaties and calling for their abolition. He also advocated for a reduction in armaments, an adjustment in colonial claims to benefit both native peoples and colonists, and freedom of the seas. Wilson proposed the removal of economic barriers between nations and the concept of national self-determination, which would be achieved through the dismantling of European empires and the creation of new states.
The Fourteen Points also included more practical objectives. Wilson hoped to keep Russia in the war by convincing the Bolsheviks that they would receive better peace terms from the Allies, as well as to bolster Allied morale and undermine German war support. The address was well-received, even by Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin, who saw it as a landmark of enlightenment in international relations.
The final point, and perhaps the most important, called for a "general association of nations" or a ""world organization" that would offer "mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity" to all nations, regardless of size. This organization, which would later become known as the League of Nations, was incorporated into the Treaty of Versailles. Wilson tirelessly campaigned for the adoption of the treaty and US membership in the League, but ultimately faced resistance in the Senate, and the US never joined.
Campaign Length: Too Much of a Good Thing?
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$65 $65

He supported self-determination and the dismantling of empires
Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy was based on his messianic philosophical belief that America had the utmost obligation to spread its principles while reflecting the 'truisms' of American thought. Wilson's diplomacy was driven by a desire to base policy on moral principles and the spread of democracy, rather than selfish materialism. He believed that the United States had a moral responsibility to deny diplomatic recognition to any Latin American government that was not democratic.
In his Fourteen Points speech, delivered to Congress on January 8, 1918, Wilson outlined his vision for a "new diplomacy". This included his support for self-determination and the dismantling of empires. Point 14 of his speech called for a "general association of nations" that would offer "mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small nations alike". This was to be achieved through the dismantling of European empires and the creation of new states. Wilson's Fourteen Points can be understood as a liberal democratic alternative to Bolshevism and German authoritarianism.
Wilson's vision for self-determination and the dismantling of empires was not without its contradictions and challenges. While he supported the idea of self-determination, he also believed that Latin American states should have democratic governments, which undermined the promise of self-determination for those countries. Additionally, Wilson's racism at home impacted his leadership abroad, and he failed to address the democratic rights of African American soldiers who fought for democracy overseas.
Furthermore, while Wilson's Fourteen Points included the abolition of secret treaties, a reduction in armaments, and an adjustment of colonial claims in the interests of both native peoples and colonists, the implementation of these ideals faced resistance. Wilson's main Allied colleagues, Georges Clemenceau of France and David Lloyd George of Great Britain, were skeptical of the applicability of Wilsonian idealism. The United States ultimately declined membership in the League of Nations due to concerns about preserving sovereignty and congressional authority to declare war.
Unlocking Campaign Manager in Pocket Politics: A Guide
You may want to see also

Wilson's diplomacy was criticised as irrationally idealistic
Woodrow Wilson's diplomacy was criticised as being irrationally idealistic. Wilson's foreign policy was based on morality and idealism rather than self-interest. He believed that the United States should only interfere in another nation's affairs when there was a moral imperative to do so. This was a significant departure from his predecessors' policies and proved difficult to uphold in practice.
Wilson's vision for a new world order was outlined in his ""Fourteen Points" speech delivered to Congress in 1918. He called for a "new diplomacy" of "open covenants openly arrived at", with an end to secret treaties and a dismantling of the imperial order. Wilson's idealism was also reflected in his advocacy for a world of law and order, where peace would be maintained through collective security and the rule of law, rather than the wielding of superior power. He believed that a league of democratic nations would assure the necessary fusion of policy and moral purpose to maintain peace.
However, critics argued that Wilson's diplomacy ignored the reality of conflicting interests between nations. E.H. Carr, for example, pointed out that while all nations favoured peace, some favoured the status quo, while others desired change. Wilson's assumption of a universal interest in peace was seen as wishful thinking, and his faith in the League of Nations as a mechanism for collective security was criticised for not recognising the need to define and defend US interests in a troubled world.
Furthermore, Wilson's idealism was undermined by his actions in Latin America, which contradicted his promise of self-determination for these nations. In Haiti and the Dominican Republic, he sent in US marines to restore order, and he also purchased the Virgin Islands from Denmark, exhibiting old-fashioned imperialism. Wilson's racism at home also impacted his leadership abroad, as he failed to address the democratic rights of African American soldiers who fought for democracy abroad.
Despite the criticisms, Wilson's diplomacy marked a shift in US foreign policy, with a focus on ideals, morality, and the spread of democracy. He is credited with the establishment of the modern presidency and the ascendance of American leadership on the international stage, shaping international politics and America's status as a world leader.
Collecting Emails for Political Campaigns: Strategies for Success
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Woodrow Wilson's main diplomacy philosophies were based on his messianic philosophical belief that America had the obligation to spread its principles while reflecting the 'truisms' of American thought. Wilson's foreign policy was based on ideals, morality, and the spread of democracy abroad. He believed in a ""new diplomacy"" consisting of "open covenants openly arrived at" and called for an end to secret agreements, free trade, and creating an intergovernmental organization addressing issues using diplomacy instead of military force.
The Fourteen Points were Wilson's statement of principles that was to be used for peace negotiations to end World War I. They included his ideas regarding nations' conduct of foreign policy, including freedom of the seas, free trade, and the concept of national self-determination. Point 14 called for a "general association of nations" that would offer "mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small nations alike."
Wilson's diplomacy had a significant impact on international politics and America's status as a world leader. His vision for collective security through US leadership in international organizations, like the League of Nations, appealed to the public. However, the US ultimately declined membership in the League due to concerns about committing to defend other nations. Wilson's diplomacy was also criticized for its irrational idealism and failure to effectively restore force and diplomacy in the interwar period.

























