The Constitution's Ratification: A Foundation For Democracy

The ratification of the US Constitution was a lengthy process that sparked intense national debate. The primary purpose of the ratification was to ensure that the new Constitution was established by the will of the people, rather than by political elites. The Constitutional Convention delegates required nine states to ratify the new Constitution, believing that this would yield the majority of citizens. The ratification process was led by Federalists, who supported the Constitution, and opposed by Anti-Federalists, who criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights. The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, produced The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays that defended the proposed new government and promoted ratification. The Constitution was officially ratified on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth state to approve it.

Explore related products

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Mapping the Constitution: The Cartographic History of the Ratification of the Constitution

$22.56 $40

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 1: Constitutional Documents and Records 1776-1787 (Volume 1)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 12: Ratification of the Constitution by the States, Maryland, No. 1 (Volume 12)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume 11: Ratification of the Constitution by the States, Maryland, No. 1 (Volume 11)

$95

The Framing and Ratification of the Constitution

$69.99

The Federalists' campaign for a stronger central government

The ratification of the US Constitution was a lengthy process, with the first state, Delaware, ratifying the Constitution on December 7, 1787, and the final state, Rhode Island, approving the document on May 29, 1790. The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, were strong supporters of the ratification, advocating for a stronger central government. They believed that the new Constitution would address the weaknesses of the previous national government under the Articles of Confederation.

Secondly, the Federalists emphasized the need for an adequate central government that could effectively govern the large and diverse territory of the United States. They argued that a strong central government would be better equipped to address the country's economic and political challenges. This included addressing the national and state debts, passing tax laws, and establishing a central bank.

Additionally, the Federalists recognized the importance of public support for the ratification process. They utilized newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings to debate the Constitution and inform citizens about the proposed new government. Hamilton, Jay, and Madison authored "The Federalist Papers," a series of 85 essays published in newspapers nationwide, to promote ratification and explain how the new government would function.

The Federalist campaign faced opposition from Anti-Federalists, who objected to the creation of a stronger central government and raised concerns about the protection of individual freedoms and states' rights. In response, the Federalists promised to add a Bill of Rights as amendments to the Constitution, addressing these objections and securing acceptance from the states.

The Federalists' efforts were ultimately successful, and the ratification of the Constitution established a stronger central government with three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The Federalists, led by Hamilton, went on to dominate the national government from 1789 to 1801, shaping economic policies, foreign affairs, and the administrative machinery of the nation.

Anti-Federalists' concerns about individual liberties

The Anti-Federalists, a group that included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers, had several concerns about individual liberties in the lead-up to the ratification of the US Constitution. They believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of states' rights. They also took issue with the unitary executive, which they believed resembled a monarch, and argued that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, not a federal one.

Anti-Federalists were concerned that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous and endanger individual liberties. They believed that the supremacy clause, in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses, would allow implied powers that could threaten rights. This argument was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights, which was eventually adopted to protect Americans' civil liberties. The Bill of Rights includes the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments.

To address Anti-Federalist concerns, the Bill of Rights also reserves any power not given to the federal government for the states and the people. This was a significant compromise, as the original draft of the Constitution declared all state laws subservient to federal ones. Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, made ratification contingent on the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. James Madison, who had initially opposed the idea, eventually agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach upon.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the Constitution was not limited to concerns about individual liberties. They also feared that republican government could not work in a country the size of the United States, and they were concerned about the role of the Senate in ratifying treaties without concurrence in the House of Representatives. Additionally, they believed that Congress was not large enough to adequately represent the people within the states.

The role of state conventions

The delegates to the Convention had both political tactics and philosophical principles in mind when constructing this process. Politically, they understood that state legislators would be reluctant to give up the powers they already possessed, so state conventions formed specifically for the purpose of ratification were more likely to approve the Constitution. Philosophically, the delegates believed that by convening state conventions of the people, the approval of the new Constitution would be an expression of the will of the people, making it superior to state legislatures.

The state conventions had several purposes beyond simply ratifying the Constitution. As the document had been produced in secrecy, the ratifying conventions informed the public of the details of the proposed new government. They also served as a public forum for debating ideas. The ratification process sparked an intense national debate between Federalists, who supported the Constitution, and Anti-Federalists, who opposed it. Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued that the Constitution provided a necessary framework for a strong and effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. They believed the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, feared that the Constitution concentrated too much power in the federal government, infringing on states' rights and lacking a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties.

The state conventions played a significant role in this debate, with citizens using newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings to passionately argue for or against ratification. The process was not without its challenges, with intense debates and opposition in several states. Delaware became the first state to ratify the Constitution on December 7, 1787, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. The tide turned in Massachusetts, where a "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory, and eventually, New Hampshire became the ninth and final state needed to ratify the Constitution on June 21, 1788.

Explore related products

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 41: Bill of Rights, No. 5 (Volume 41)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 38: Bill of Rights, No. 2, The Public Debate, September 1787-May 1788 (Volume 38)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 40: Bill of Rights, No. 4, 1 January-31 August 1789 (Volume 40)

$95

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 37: The Bill of Rights, No. 1 (Volume 37)

$95

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Original Intentions: On the Making and Ratification of the United States Constitution

$32.67

George Washington's influence

The ratification of the US Constitution was a process set up by the Constitutional Convention to ensure that the new Constitution was established by the will of the people, rather than by a few political elites. The Constitution was to be ratified by a majority of states (nine out of 13) and a majority of the country's citizens.

Washington's commanding presence and leadership during the convention prompted the delegates to envision an executive with extensive powers. He facilitated the ratification process throughout various states, including Virginia, where he wrote letters to political leaders urging them to support the Constitution. Washington also sent copies of the document to Thomas Jefferson, the Marquis de Lafayette, and several former governors of Virginia, hoping for their backing.

In his correspondence, Washington made a clear case for why the Constitution should be ratified. He argued that the unity of the nation had been tested under the Articles of Confederation, and the current government was so powerless that it risked dissolution. He understood the states' desire to retain their power but maintained that individuals must give up some liberty to preserve the rest. Washington also praised the amendment provision, which provided a method for correcting problems that arose after the Constitution's implementation.

Washington's support for the Constitution was leveraged by Federalists to promote ratification. His signature on the document and his private letters revealing his endorsement were used as evidence of his approval. While Washington did not make many public statements, his letter to the president of Congress, attached to the Constitution, emphasised the spirit of amity and mutual deference that went into its creation.

In summary, George Washington's influence on the ratification of the Constitution was substantial. His role as president of the Constitutional Convention, his support for a strong national government, his private advocacy, and his endorsement of the final document all contributed to the successful ratification and the establishment of the United States federal government.

Amendments and the Bill of Rights

The ratification of the US Constitution was a lengthy and challenging process that culminated in the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. The Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, by 38 out of 41 delegates, but it required ratification by nine of the 13 existing states to come into effect. The ratification process was designed to ensure that the new Constitution was established by the will of the people, rather than by political elites. This was achieved by holding state conventions, which served to inform the public about the proposed new government and provided a platform for debate.

The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to unify the nation, protect against foreign threats, and manage domestic affairs effectively. They also argued that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, opposed the ratification. They criticized the absence of a Bill of Rights and argued that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties and concentrated too much power in the federal government at the expense of states' rights. The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists played out in newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings across the country, with both sides passionately defending their positions.

The first state to ratify the Constitution was Delaware on December 7, 1787, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. The ratification process was not smooth, with significant opposition in several states. The tide turned in Massachusetts, where the "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory. On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the Constitution, ensuring that it would go into effect.

Following ratification, Congress adopted 12 of Madison's 17 amendments, which were sent to the states for ratification. Ten of these amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were ratified on December 15, 1791. The Bill of Rights addressed the concerns raised by the Anti-Federalists and ensured that individual liberties and rights were protected under the new Constitution.

Frequently asked questions